None gives codes for Integration. Israel integrates derby by sending Israel engineers. Similarly, France integrates Meteor into Rafake & M2K by sending its engineers. India only uses the items but otherwise has no idea of its working. It is just like you using a laptop bit don't have the codes of its BIOS, WINDOWS or any other important things
And Russians give away codes or don't care if anyone re-writes them because they are stupid?
Western countries in general are christian allies. Countries like Turkey don't get these privilege despite being in NATO due to it not being christian.
With each post your arguments get stupider and stupider. First it was about NATO. Then West. Now Christianity. What next? White countries? Countries that have X colors on their flag? Or countries authorized by the Illuminati?
Neither Israel is Christian nor is Japan. Yet Israelis can integrated Derby on American radar and JASDF are allowed to integrate AMRAAM on Japanese radar.
It is about whether a country has the requisite contracts and agreements in place that govern and oversee the rules regarding usage of said equipment (like COMCASA/CISMOA), and whether the US govt thinks these agreements will/can be upheld or not.
That's why Turkey is allowed to integrate SOM-J on their planned F-35 fleet prior to recent bout of diplomatic issues (though it isn't slaved to radar, codes to allow for FCS integration and weapons-release is still required).
SAAB did not write its own FBW in Gripen C. It hired some other country engineer to do it. SAAB is not better than DRDO. DRDO is better than SAAB. Sweden hardly has any Technology and moat of it is imported. The Gripen radar, jet engine, air defence are all imports.
And all Tejas stuff is indigenous?
Stop ridiculing yourself. SAAB built many well-performing jets like Draken & Viggen before the Gripen and even if you think otherwise, no can deny that Gripen program has been far more successful than Tejas can be in next 20 years even.
Better if labs like DRDO (and people like yourself) do little bit of introspection instead of just mindless jingoism.
You can't modify an existing engine to become 15% more powerful. The engines are highly precision manufactured and there is no room for any changes. An engine has to be developed from beginning.
Increase of thrust is always feasible as long as more efficient, refined materials are applied. All engines have headroom for improvement but it requires continuous R&D to fully exploit and implement those improvements.
GE Aviation does not need you to educate them about what's possible and what's not. Who do you think you are? What are your qualifications in field of aero engines or aeronautical engineering?
Similarly, EPE from F414 has to be developed just like F414 was developed from F404. This is no simple job. USA has no plane which needs EPE engine and hence there is hardly any reason why USA will make it. No country develops an engine to be used by some other country. Expect USA to develop another new engine just for use by India is an extremely insane idea.
Firstly, the EPE is already earmarked for F/A-18 Advanced Super Hornet that is being marketed by Boeing across world.
Secondly, the engine is not developed by US government but by GE Aviation - it's a private company with private funds (EPE is not a program-sanctioned project) and they develop things for where they think there is a market to be catered to.
GE is not like DRDO/GTRE that solely works on Armed Forces ASQR for 99% of time.