Very stealthy that scope...... The stylish way was to use the main air intake flow.what ?what fresh air are we talking about here ?
Very stealthy that scope...... The stylish way was to use the main air intake flow.
Probably LM enginners forget it and add it after....
yeah sure , LM engineers are dumb , you are smart couldnt be asked to explain anything to a moron like you anymore
you just gonna forgot and repeat the same nonsense again 
, no point talking to a stubborn moron
What is magical is to think that you are always right . Even when weput the evidence under his nose.
keep on speaking nonsense , i dont care
Oh this is suitable for you
You speak, speak, speak.... You even forget your initial request.as i said before ultimate structure G limit mean little when compare aircraft agility
that why i talk about Mig-25 , F-14 , F-4 turning high G , do you understand now moron ?
How cute , you convinently ignored that fact that you cant come up with any factual video evidence to show that Rafale turn quicker than F-35, and the point about structure G limit have been explained like a billions times but as a troll you are , you pretend like you didnt understand
" )
Yeah, what ever you say kid, everyone that have followed the conversation from the start know that you are a moron and a desperate troll, nothing more You are not smart or knowledgeable enough to argue on technical aspects so all you do is play dumb and repeated nonsense again and again, even though it have been explained , even you, yourself know that you lose the argument, you still behave like a desperate child and pretend like you didn't understand
No, i used insult because you try to troll (when you realized that you lose argument, and cant come up with any reasonable argument). And if i have a small brain then i guess you have none
. what? you put evidence? what sort of evidence did you put other than saying nonsense like "oh it looks fat so it's aerodynamic must be bad" and "oh F-135 have 18 tons thrust so it must have high IR signature"
I'm fifty. Mechanical Engineer graduate. Plant manager. Found of aeronautic before you were born....
:blah::blah::blah::blah: At least you are a speaking little Bear.No, i used insult because you try to troll (when you realized that you lose argument, and cant come up with any reasonable argument). And if i have a small brain then i guess you have none
Oh and winning in dogfight exercise doesn't mean an aircraft is more agile either, unless you think T-38 has better agility than F-22 and F-4 has better agility than Rafale
what? You are an engineer and learned aerodynamic?
The fact that you dont even know and understand the basics fact like engine thrust changes significantly with altitude and speed or that aircraft turn rate has little to do with their structure G limit clearly shows everyone here that you dont know shit about aerodynamic not even the basics one let alone advance matter
among other things Kid.
Literally every kid on the block is getting these F-35s.
Something i have been saying for soooo long. Rafale deal is something which Congress started for its own good (obviously) but it could not get through due to unveiling of many scams. Now BJP seems much inclined towards getting this deal through somehow, and IAF is behaving like a kid in a candy store. First BJP needs to understand the changing situation around for that IAF will have accept it first.
For the simple reason than the 8 to 9 billion Rafale deal is with support and base accomodation, and the F35 deal not.
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | |
| W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
|
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | |
|
|
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |
