smestarz
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
- Messages
- 1,929
- Likes
- 1,056
Legend comes from facts, but yours are pure BS coming straight from the stable of pro Rafale junkies,
Like I said.,. links should be enough to quieten any doubts,,. credible links..
So, if a French company spends 25% of Rafale cost then its superior, but when american avionics company spends more than that , its not credible company that can design good avionics?
I think you best only comment about something you know which is Rafale, and do follow up with links,,
Try not to talk abt Su-30 MKI, PAKFA, F-35 etc, because you do not know anything about it, You can just keep weaving your Rafale BS..
BS is only with Rafale (no supporting links) for otherr planes there re no such legends, there are facts supported by credible links..
Like I said.,. links should be enough to quieten any doubts,,. credible links..
So, if a French company spends 25% of Rafale cost then its superior, but when american avionics company spends more than that , its not credible company that can design good avionics?
I think you best only comment about something you know which is Rafale, and do follow up with links,,
Try not to talk abt Su-30 MKI, PAKFA, F-35 etc, because you do not know anything about it, You can just keep weaving your Rafale BS..
BS is only with Rafale (no supporting links) for otherr planes there re no such legends, there are facts supported by credible links..
Maybe it's a legend. The fact is taht this legend is only for Rafale..... not such things for EF, SH18, SU, Mig, F22....
I remember that 25% of the developpment funds were for Spectra. And french electronic warfare company are specialists.