halloweene
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2012
- Messages
- 546
- Likes
- 230
Dont expect too much tho, Communication has never been Dassault's policy...
Good report Blanced and exact words from A to Z.
eh..??:shocked:This costs the French military 1.2 billion eurs per year of a total military budget of 5.7 billion per year
True, in a dog fight, it is the pilot who wins.F-22 in a dogfight is not a difficult kill, an Mki will most certainly walk all over it, F-18SH also has dogfight kills on it, dogfighting needs proper nose pointing capabilty and Rafale, EF, MKI SH are all equally good in such areas, comes down to pilot skills in the end. So this F-22 kill is hardly worthy of note.
The stories about Mig-21 in CI are exaggerated. They were not turning circles around any aircraft. They actually demonstrated BVR capability against a superior adversary, not WVR capability.Mki I am sure walked all over the Rafale and Ef as well during such training. My guess is the LCA mk-1 and eventually mk-2 will rule the skies for dogfights since they are tiny and would be hard to visually spot them in the first place. Just like Mig-21 Bis were turning circles round the F-15 during excercises.
No statement could be more incorrect. Nailing an F-22 is quite difficult and has only been proven beyond refute by Rafale. That SH photo was refuted as a revenge shot after DACTs was completed. Rafale already made short work of MKI, SH and EFT, now it goes undefeated against F-22. The new benchmark to beat in a dog fight is now Rafale.F-22 in a dogfight is not a difficult kill, an Mki will most certainly walk all over it, F-18SH also has dogfight kills on it, dogfighting needs proper nose pointing capabilty and Rafale, EF, MKI SH are all equally good in such areas, comes down to pilot skills in the end. So this F-22 kill is hardly worthy of note.
Mki I am sure walked all over the Rafale and Ef as well during such training. My guess is the LCA mk-1 and eventually mk-2 will rule the skies for dogfights since they are tiny and would be hard to visually spot them in the first place. Just like Mig-21 Bis were turning circles round the F-15 during excercises.
Fact.No statement could be more incorrect. Nailing an F-22 is quite difficult and has only been proven beyond refute by Rafale. That SH photo was refuted as a revenge shot after DACTs was completed.
Fiction (or say, huge over-statement, especially the BOLD part). I have seen the above video. But this claim does not have enough valid ground. Care to elaborate, please ?Rafale already made short work of MKI, SH and EFT, now it goes undefeated against F-22. The new benchmark to beat in a dog fight is now Rafale.
.MiG-21 never even got to the merge with F-15s, there only kills were BVRs with simulated R-77s
Typical sales-pitch coupled with jingoistic rant. Reality is: You never know (enough).Reality would have been most shots going wild with the track record of Amraamsky.
Ok, @p2prada, which fighters today have best demonstrated climb-rates ?True, in a dog fight, it is the pilot who wins.
Anyway, MKIs T/W ratio is not impressive enough to challenge the newer aircraft regardless of its other qualities due to the inferior climb rates.
Could you please share how the above two work, especially the High-Off Bore-Sight & which Indian/Chinese fighters are going to have that?Tiny aircraft are obsolete especially considering the advent of HOBS and may be even 360 degree IRST capability.
What is a 11:1 T/W ratio, never heard it before? It is usually expressed in decimals, right ?It mattered earlier when engines were not as good and there was a limit to how good the flight software was. With good engines (with T/W ratio surpassing 11:1), the bigger the aircraft, the better your chances.
I do understand the L/D ratio part & obviously agree with the assessment.Imagine a PAKFA with a T/W of 1.2 - 1.3 when carrying 11 tonnes of fuel and a L/D ratio that surpasses all other current aircraft and highly likely to maintain its position even with newer aircraft being introduced.
Because Air et Cosmos and secret defence blog reported Rafale fought F-22 to a draw on all occasions but one, turns out the but one was a Rafale win.Fiction (or say, huge over-statement, especially the BOLD part). I have seen the above video. But this claim does not have enough valid ground.
Are we talking DACT/war-exercise or simulation ? Any links or share..Because Air et Cosmos and secret defence blog reported Rafale fought F-22 to a draw on all occasions but one, turns out the but one was a Rafale win.
Trust me there was also a video on itBecause Air et Cosmos and secret defence blog reported Rafale fought F-22 to a draw on all occasions but one, turns out the but one was a Rafale win.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |