LondonParisTokyo
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 2,971
- Likes
- 8,238
Everything has a cost. A high upfront cost usually pays off after some time. Definitely the case with a domestic testbed
A single test bed will cost around $500 million. This include the aircraft with structural modification, airworthy certification, pilot training, sensors and test equipment.How much does it cost approximately? I mean it can't be that expensive. If we have to become self reliant in Jet Engine technology we have to have a test bed. That test bed can also be utilized for high bypass engines tests too when we start building transport aircraft on our own.
This is peanuts. Look at the complete development cost of Kaveri. Domestic testbed saves time on testing, saves time on renting foreign equipmentA single test bed will cost around $500 million. This include the aircraft with structural modification, airworthy certification, pilot training, sensors and test equipment.
However this will only be for Kaveri and engines having similar characteristics (physical, fluid-dynamics, etc).
The same test-bed can't be used for high bypass engines tests. Either will have to modify the existing test-bed or buy a new test-bed completely.
Is that for the drone program or is it actually the jet version? Would be great if it was the jet version. If it is only for the drone program, I'm like eh
No, you can. But in order to do that, you have to change the structure of the plane, also the internal wire, electricity supply and installation of other machines, so you either get assistance from the plane manufacturer at massive cost or taking the huge fault risk by doing it yourselves (no one can).So why can't we modify some Air India passenger jet or even Embraer Jet which we have in our inventory?
Peanut? Well, only look at this field, yes, it is. But don't forget there are quite a lot other programs are also asking for money. Even if every one is only asking for peanut, together the demand is more than any government can afford. Keep this in mind: the demanding is unlimited, the resource is always limited.This is peanuts. Look at the complete development cost of Kaveri. Domestic testbed saves time on testing, saves time on renting foreign equipment
Is there no other way to simulate high altitude testing? Even if the test bed is expensive it's something necessary for self reliance. The cost is a necessary evil which we have to bear for our own security.A single test bed will cost around $500 million. This include the aircraft with structural modification, airworthy certification, pilot training, sensors and test equipment.
However this will only be for Kaveri and engines having similar characteristics (physical, fluid-dynamics, etc).
The same test-bed can't be used for high bypass engines tests. Either will have to modify the existing test-bed or buy a new test-bed completely.
Their are programs available like GSP or PROOSIS where by you can mathematically simulate high altitude testing which is also done by GTRE but live testing is needed where production and manufacturing limitations and defects also come in play and need to be analyzed.Is there no other way to simulate high altitude testing? Even if the test bed is expensive it's something necessary for self reliance. The cost is a necessary evil which we have to bear for our own security.
I had heard some news reports few months back that Kaveri Dry thrust engine can be used to power our upcoming Ghatak UAV.So from what I understood from reading the threads, we have been able to successfully able to demonstrate usable dry thrust Kaveri. Is there any reason we haven't seen this engine being used in some subsonic applications? Like bombers whose engines generally are made from the traditional engines without the hot core??
High Altitude testing facility.Is there no other way to simulate high altitude testing? Even if the test bed is expensive it's something necessary for self reliance. The cost is a necessary evil which we have to bear for our own security.
IndiaHigh Altitude testing facility.
USA:
View attachment 153212
Russia
View attachment 153214
UK
View attachment 153215
Japan
View attachment 153213
China
View attachment 153216
only for rockets ?
Gotta ask isro..only for rockets ?
Very funny.
What nonsense is this ! How many times the same circus keeps repeating right since LCA days ! Effing babus never learn, must first invest in a flying test bed asap, and no its not cheap ! Jet engine dev never is
Recently defense decode said its going through ground testingWhat nonsense is this ! How many times the same circus keeps repeating right since LCA days ! Effing babus never learn, must first invest in a flying test bed asap, and no its not cheap ! Jet engine dev never is