Haha! They will tell anything to please the people who are paying them. The engine tech we used is ancient by today's standards. Sufficient effort was made. But the result reflects in GTRE's inability to put the engine on a fighter for test flights.
i agree to some extent with u they are corporate people GTRE was not helped either financially or politically and we know our political elite people and their corporate ideas and ideals very much.
Does it matter? Replace all the GTRE scientists with Russians and Americans then. Even today we don't have an engine that is flight tested. At least the Chinese have flight tested their engines.
and please comment their origin of knowledge for constructing the engine and any ideas about thrust to weight figures and how rigorously they were tested or how many hours after chinese engine need to be replaced. learn it and then comment...............well we dont want americans or russians let our people come back.
15 years ago, all the products you named mostly used foreign engines. We built our first aircraft in the 60s. We still don't have an engine. People recognize you with what you accomplished and not what you tried.
we didnt produced an automobile engine but when we produced a working aeroengine u feel very bad about it and how many set backs did others had in producing a working engine.our people dosent have short sight or long sight but they have astigmatism nothing can be seen clearly,due to our netas loooong and strong fore sight today we dont have a completely tested engine.
ROTFL! You are an obvious loggerhead. Was this article written by an Indian or a foreigner? What is the credibility of the writer? Does he know what he is writing about? Does he even know what a compressor is?
dont want wheather it was written by indian or a by aforeigner or loggerhead like me what i want to tell is IAF wants desh made KAVERI engine.it just represents IAF views.
IAF has the M-53, AL-31FP, the GE F404 and now will take deliveries of either the EJ-200 or M88 along with GE F414. Each of these engines are much better than the Kaveri.requested Kaveri to be wholly Indian. But GTRE said they cannot deliver. That's why there is the GTRE-Snecma JV.
it is better we we dont talk about M53 a single engine mirage use to drink as much fuel as a dual engined mig 29,
AL-31FP -- dose it has a fadec,what its thrust to weight ratio.... similar to kaveri ....a person can be easily accomodated inside russian engines .........when the GTRE people asked for changes in dimensions in kaveri IAF rejectedd ..... ge404 has LCA got the foc and how much do we have in service.
Haha! Keep comforting yourself as much as you can. You have never seen how much ego a guy with a Phd has. They are laughing at us as loud as they can.Even if GTRE succeeds with K-9, it won't change the fact that it is of little use to the IAF.
well good if IAF is not happy the NAVY is happy with it
The Kaveri has been a disappointing project.
it is only for u and our NETAS not for indians as whole........u r thinking as if USA,RUSSIA,FRANCE and UK as ur uncle or aunt and they will give u when ever u ask,on seeing ur rant......disappointment,failure,very old,dosent fit needs,curse,funding problems,frustration etc etc will come before a successful engine.
Even the GTRE-Snecma Kaveri isn't Kaveri, it is the GTRE-Snecma M88. We have dumped our Kaveri's Kabini core to the M88's ECO core. That speaks a lot about our current capability.
they are utilizing the technologies from kaveri and m88 to make a hibrid, definately a lot will be taken from an experinced partner and i am not completely sure about the ECO core since the max thrust achieved by that till date is 90kn the jv will make considerable chnges to it,and i frankly agree that it is not as good as french with material technology.
i agree to some extent with u they are corporate people GTRE was not helped either financially or politically and we know our political elite people and their corporate ideas and ideals very much.
Does it matter? Replace all the GTRE scientists with Russians and Americans then. Even today we don't have an engine that is flight tested. At least the Chinese have flight tested their engines.
and please comment their origin of knowledge for constructing the engine and any ideas about thrust to weight figures and how rigorously they were tested or how many hours after chinese engine need to be replaced. learn it and then comment...............well we dont want americans or russians let our people come back.
15 years ago, all the products you named mostly used foreign engines. We built our first aircraft in the 60s. We still don't have an engine. People recognize you with what you accomplished and not what you tried.
we didnt produced an automobile engine but when we produced a working aeroengine u feel very bad about it and how many set backs did others had in producing a working engine.our people dosent have short sight or long sight but they have astigmatism nothing can be seen clearly,due to our netas loooong and strong fore sight today we dont have a completely tested engine.
ROTFL! You are an obvious loggerhead. Was this article written by an Indian or a foreigner? What is the credibility of the writer? Does he know what he is writing about? Does he even know what a compressor is?
dont want wheather it was written by indian or a by aforeigner or loggerhead like me what i want to tell is IAF wants desh made KAVERI engine.it just represents IAF views.
IAF has the M-53, AL-31FP, the GE F404 and now will take deliveries of either the EJ-200 or M88 along with GE F414. Each of these engines are much better than the Kaveri.requested Kaveri to be wholly Indian. But GTRE said they cannot deliver. That's why there is the GTRE-Snecma JV.
it is better we we dont talk about M53 a single engine mirage use to drink as much fuel as a dual engined mig 29,
AL-31FP -- dose it has a fadec,what its thrust to weight ratio.... similar to kaveri ....a person can be easily accomodated inside russian engines .........when the GTRE people asked for changes in dimensions in kaveri IAF rejectedd ..... ge404 has LCA got the foc and how much do we have in service.
Haha! Keep comforting yourself as much as you can. You have never seen how much ego a guy with a Phd has. They are laughing at us as loud as they can.Even if GTRE succeeds with K-9, it won't change the fact that it is of little use to the IAF.
well good if IAF is not happy the NAVY is happy with it
The Kaveri has been a disappointing project.
it is only for u and our NETAS not for indians as whole........u r thinking as if USA,RUSSIA,FRANCE and UK as ur uncle or aunt and they will give u when ever u ask,on seeing ur rant......disappointment,failure,very old,dosent fit needs,curse,funding problems,frustration etc etc will come before a successful engine.
Even the GTRE-Snecma Kaveri isn't Kaveri, it is the GTRE-Snecma M88. We have dumped our Kaveri's Kabini core to the M88's ECO core. That speaks a lot about our current capability.
they are utilizing the technologies from kaveri and m88 to make a hibrid, definately a lot will be taken from an experinced partner and i am not completely sure about the ECO core since the max thrust achieved by that till date is 90kn the jv will make considerable chnges to it,and i frankly agree that it is not as good as french with material technology.
Last edited: