- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,416
- Likes
- 56,946
Copied from Wikipedia.
Going by my interpretation:
The provisions:[47]
Going by my interpretation:
The provisions:[47]
- Affirm that cooperative activities under these Accords should be exclusively for peaceful purposes and in accordance with relevant international law. - Not problematic or diverting with what India states unless there is a treaty banning further ASAT tests
- Confirm a commitment to transparency and to share scientific information, consistent with Article XI of the Outer Space Treaty. - Already in practice
- Call for a commitment to use reasonable efforts to utilize current interoperability standards for space-based infrastructure, and to establish standards when they do not exist or are inadequate. - Long term process. Might require India to modify launch vehicle spares as per American standards for interchangeability of parts. Positive if India becomes a production house for global space rockets, negative if it becomes a dumpyard of rocket spares.
- Call for a commitment to take all reasonable efforts to render necessary assistance to personnel in outer space who are in distress and according to their obligations under the Rescue and Return Agreement. - Obviously not a problem
- Specify responsibility for the registration of objects in space, as required by the Registration Convention - Already in practice by entire world
- Call for a commitment to publicly share information on their activities and to the open sharing of scientific data. While doing so, signatories agree to coordinate with each other to provide appropriate protection for any proprietary and/or export-controlled information, and this provision does not extend to private sector operations unless conducted on behalf of a signatory. - Not a problem
- Include an agreement to preserve outer space heritage, which they consider to comprise historically significant human or robotic landing sites, artifacts, spacecraft, and other evidence of activity, and to contribute to multinational efforts to develop practices and rules to do so. - Obviously not a problem
- Include an agreement that extraction and utilization of space resources should be conducted in a manner that complies with the Outer Space Treaty and in support of safe and sustainable activities. The signatories affirm that this does not inherently constitute national appropriation, which is prohibited by the Outer Space Treaty. They also express an intent to contribute to multilateral efforts to further develop international practices and rules on this subject. - Could be a huge long term problem
- Reaffirm the signatories commitment to the Outer Space Treaty's provisions relating to due regard and harmful interference with other nations activities, and to provide information regarding the location and nature of space-based activities. Signatories express an intention to contribute to multilateral efforts to further develop international practices, criteria, and rules to assure this. To implement this, the Accords provide for the announcement of "safety zones", where other operations or an anomalous event could reasonably cause harmful interference. The size and scope of these safe zones should be based on the nature and environment of the operations involved and determined in a reasonable manner leveraging commonly accepted scientific and engineering principles. Within their safety zones, the signatories commit to respect the principle of free access to all areas of celestial bodies by others and all other provisions of the Outer Space Treaty. - Already in practice
- Include a commitment to mitigate space debris and to limit the generation of new, harmful space debris in the normal operations, break-up in operational or post-mission phases, and accidents. - Not a problem