ISRO General News and Updates

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,461
Country flag

Swesh

New Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,185

Swesh

New Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,185
So the print posted propaganda artical on isro should only focus on small launchers
But they got reply from Chad isro enthusiastic like me in another article
. promoting the implementation of existing guidelines as well as discussing the possibilities of developing new guidelines to address the sustainability issues of small satellites, including satellite constellations.

There may be Indian companies working on deorbiting satellites but there are none with such demonstrated capability. It can increase its order book size but I am not sure how much they can deliver until they demonstrate capability.

It would be interesting to see India’s response in the Working Group as the partly Indian-owned company OneWeb may be one of the affected parties of these rules.

However, challenges remain. India would need to ensure that the benefits provided by its small satellites are unique and not in conflict with any existing space programmes of partner/beneficiary nations. Furthermore, the gap between promise and performance must also be addressed since there is a perception that India’s other bilateral infrastructure projects have been afflicted by delays, whatever the cause may be. In the end, India has an opportunity to share the manifold benefits of its prowess in space with other countries. It must do so actively as a form of space diplomacy. Space has always been characterised as a part of the global commons. India can now validate this axiom to the advantage of the comity of nations.

Space is presently an opportunity for collaboration and data-sharing. As a part of space diplomacy, it must share data from its small but aging fleet of remote-sensing satellites. It must provide the services it already does for disaster management and search and rescue operations.

ISRO must first work on the gap between promise and performance for its own fleet of satellites (remote-sensing, communications, and navigation) and missions like Chandrayaan 3.

My prescriptions

Space was characterized as a part of the global commons, but it is falling apart today. I think India must try to make sure that outer space becomes part of a global commons, parts of which (like the Moon and Mars) are opened up for competition and commercial exploitation after all countries are consulted through mechanisms like UN-COPUOS.

On the question asked in the sub-heading of the article, on whether India must now build small satellites and forge global partnerships? I do not know.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Oceansat will be launched on 26th of November, 2022
@Vamsi @Indx TechStyle @Haldilal
You have launch schedule thread bro. Anyway, I'm copying this post of yours there (you will remain post owner).
So the print posted propaganda artical on isro should only focus on small launchers
But they got reply from Chad isro enthusiastic like me in another article
. promoting the implementation of existing guidelines as well as discussing the possibilities of developing new guidelines to address the sustainability issues of small satellites, including satellite constellations.

There may be Indian companies working on deorbiting satellites but there are none with such demonstrated capability. It can increase its order book size but I am not sure how much they can deliver until they demonstrate capability.

It would be interesting to see India’s response in the Working Group as the partly Indian-owned company OneWeb may be one of the affected parties of these rules.

However, challenges remain. India would need to ensure that the benefits provided by its small satellites are unique and not in conflict with any existing space programmes of partner/beneficiary nations. Furthermore, the gap between promise and performance must also be addressed since there is a perception that India’s other bilateral infrastructure projects have been afflicted by delays, whatever the cause may be. In the end, India has an opportunity to share the manifold benefits of its prowess in space with other countries. It must do so actively as a form of space diplomacy. Space has always been characterised as a part of the global commons. India can now validate this axiom to the advantage of the comity of nations.

Space is presently an opportunity for collaboration and data-sharing. As a part of space diplomacy, it must share data from its small but aging fleet of remote-sensing satellites. It must provide the services it already does for disaster management and search and rescue operations.

ISRO must first work on the gap between promise and performance for its own fleet of satellites (remote-sensing, communications, and navigation) and missions like Chandrayaan 3.

My prescriptions

Space was characterized as a part of the global commons, but it is falling apart today. I think India must try to make sure that outer space becomes part of a global commons, parts of which (like the Moon and Mars) are opened up for competition and commercial exploitation after all countries are consulted through mechanisms like UN-COPUOS.

On the question asked in the sub-heading of the article, on whether India must now build small satellites and forge global partnerships? I do not know.
Also, attaining ability to carry out heavy commercial launches won't affect India's capabilities to launch small SATs but only will boost it by increased launch frequency for vehicles like SSLV, NSLV & PSLV and even Agnikul and Skyroot will capture that market.

Heavy satellite market will give an ill-funded ISRO revenue like never before. They can surpass Russian or European space agencies in budget alone from gains if they do heavy commerical launches as frequently as light (and demand will boost heavy rocket launch frequency too like it did in China). It's international heavy satellite launches what shored up China's space industry in 90s.
 

Swesh

New Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,185
You have launch schedule thread bro. Anyway, I'm copying this post of yours there (you will remain post owner).

Also, attaining ability to carry out heavy commercial launches won't affect India's capabilities to launch small SATs but only will boost it by increased launch frequency for vehicles like SSLV, NSLV & PSLV and even Agnikul and Skyroot will capture that market.

Heavy satellite market will give an ill-funded ISRO revenue like never before. They can surpass Russian or European space agencies in budget alone from gains if they do heavy commerical launches as frequently as light (and demand will boost heavy rocket launch frequency too like it did in China). It's international heavy satellite launches what shored up China's space industry in 90s.
This isn't the first time when the print got reply for their propegenda last time they paddel lie about isro employees unhappy with them some of the employee gave very detailed reply to them
 

Maveli

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Messages
264
Likes
731
Country flag
This isn't the first time when the print got reply for their propegenda last time they paddel lie about isro employees unhappy with them some of the employee gave very detailed reply to them
I am confused. Can you explain what "propaganda" was in the article you linked to? What did the article lie about?
 

Swesh

New Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,185
I am confused. Can you explain what "propaganda" was in the article you linked to? What did the article lie about?
This block India to move on to next generation of satellites and high throughput satellites which basically form internet other than submarsible cables. Things on internet can be tamed easily if you control submersible cables arround you and have large no of HTS. CHINA did this
 

Articles

Top