Just two questions.............That's why this step.
ISRO isn't doing it very happily actually.
With just an ability to launch 5-7 MLLVs/year which would comprise both your own missions as well as commercial launches, it's an unnecessary overload.
Market is lying there around world. Our problem is lack of production lines and hereby low launch frequency.
I neither see our infrastructure too weak nor I see you having even a little clue on what exactly is happening.
Moreover, in anyway, it doesn't affect our cost competitiveness. Not doing it will increase costs for sure.
It's only competition and privatization which reduces launch costs while making profits as well. ISRO DOESN'T TRY TO KEEP COSTS LOW AND KILL ITS PROFITS.
Nor anyone in world is reserved to launch from India. Cost will increase with global inflation. ISRO being alone Indian administration isn't going to be able to take care of any cost reduction projects.
You aren't able to get it at all.
Expansion of SAC should take place to produce both research spacecrafts well as communication satellites in assembly lines. Communication SATs to be taken care of by other allied agencies and research probes by ISRO. Much like cold war era US & USSR.
- DoS will become the sole space administration of the nation while ISRO chairman may not be the executive of department anymore. This administration and not ISRO itself have to issue licenses, distribute transponders and bandwidths which at first place is not supposed be to be done a research agency.
- More launch pads will be set up across coasts and islands. Private companies will be emerging later. A launch administration will still be arriving earlier (similar to ULA. We already subcontract our launch systems to private vendors.
India needs at least 100 geocentric satellites and at the same time needs to export. Mass production of satellites and launch systems is only key for it.
By "decentralization", we aren't suppressing ISRO itself. ISRO is a part of government of India just like any other agency. More offices will be built to divide work.
The REVENUE about which you are so concerned is being earned for India. For government of India. ISRO isn't supposed to be a competing agency against other government agencies for "revenue". It was never supposed to be a self funding or revenue earning agency. Government gives it money. How do I shove this up in your mind?
As long as government earns, it's same thing. (Decentralization) And if it gets liberalized (privatization), private players will multiply industry and even more money will come in form of tax.
Then, you must be aware that ISRO will still have more research budget and stupid arbitration, public wealfare and other expenditures won't be there for it.
They have built SSLV and about to sell licenses to completely produce and launch PSLV and SSLV to private vendors.
Government has been training them for years.
https://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/indias-emerging-private-space-sector.81636/
"Build private sector first before decentralization". Private sectors emerge only post decentralization.
You aren't relating things at the moment. Are you drunk bro?
First: Other then ISRO, who have till date even displayed a genuine capability at the rate of 10% (ISRO launch revenue)?
Second: How is it going to help private launches in India?