pmaitra
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,600
Re: Interesting and unrelated threads getting hidden in a blotted thre
I have observed the modus operandi of @apple. His purpose is to scold others in a pretentious way, so as to create an impression, with much less success than he perceives, of his "vast" mine of knowledge. Exhibit A: "Stop using google and discussing subjects you know nothing about."
What he does very promptly is negate what others have said. Exhibit A: "Janssonin kiusaus, pyttipannu and graavilohi are all foods eaten in Finland, but none of them are particularly Finnish."
However, he does not provide any information himself, such as, as to what those pictures actually depict. Exhibit A: "Your pictures don't depict any of those dishes BTW."
Yet, his enthusiasm to correct others is seldom dampened, whether summer or winter. Exhibit B: "Just to correct some irrelevant points made in this thread."
For some reason, this enthusiasm to correct others does not translate into him necessarily stating something correct. Exhibit B: "Am pretty sure Lenin never went to Britain."
One must give him credit, for writing utter gibberish with the confidence of a fly that flies into the fire, and thereby, into its demise. It is not the wrong information he provides that comes across as the most obnoxious. It is his overconfidence in what he thinks his "knowledge" is, and his contempt for those that are less ignorant that he himself is.
Let us not forget, his tendency to open attention seeking threads (like this thread), where he either whines, or comes up with his typical litany of conjured up grievances.
Is this a medical condition, and if yes, does this medical condition have a name?
Exhibit A
Sir,It is time you shed your pomposity as if you are the sole globe trotter in this world and are aware of everything.
Be advised that you are from a country that is down under and far from the world.
On the issue of costs deciding the delicacy or nutritional value of food, that is most juvenile, apart from being indicative that you are of the noveau riche class of mindset and mere petty bourgeois.
It does not matter which denomination of Catholicity one follows, the genesis and basic principles are the same. Pray, quit pontificating since you are deluding yourself that in India we do not understand the world religions and its sects. Our country is a diverse country with all types of sects and religions being practised.
And BTW if one has an independent mind and comments without partisanship, he is neither a Russophile or a Western slave. He just has a mind unlike others who sell the souls to achieve reflected glory.
Australia is but a vassal, not India.
I have observed the modus operandi of @apple. His purpose is to scold others in a pretentious way, so as to create an impression, with much less success than he perceives, of his "vast" mine of knowledge. Exhibit A: "Stop using google and discussing subjects you know nothing about."
What he does very promptly is negate what others have said. Exhibit A: "Janssonin kiusaus, pyttipannu and graavilohi are all foods eaten in Finland, but none of them are particularly Finnish."
However, he does not provide any information himself, such as, as to what those pictures actually depict. Exhibit A: "Your pictures don't depict any of those dishes BTW."
Yet, his enthusiasm to correct others is seldom dampened, whether summer or winter. Exhibit B: "Just to correct some irrelevant points made in this thread."
For some reason, this enthusiasm to correct others does not translate into him necessarily stating something correct. Exhibit B: "Am pretty sure Lenin never went to Britain."
One must give him credit, for writing utter gibberish with the confidence of a fly that flies into the fire, and thereby, into its demise. It is not the wrong information he provides that comes across as the most obnoxious. It is his overconfidence in what he thinks his "knowledge" is, and his contempt for those that are less ignorant that he himself is.
Let us not forget, his tendency to open attention seeking threads (like this thread), where he either whines, or comes up with his typical litany of conjured up grievances.
Is this a medical condition, and if yes, does this medical condition have a name?
Exhibit A
Exhibit BStop using google and discussing subjects you know nothing about.
Janssonin kiusaus, pyttipannu and graavilohi are all foods eaten in Finland, but none of them are particularly Finnish. Your pictures don't depict any of those dishes BTW.
Gravlax is some of the most expensive meat you can get. Actually, along with lobster and some types of beef it's probably the most expensive. Reindeer and blood sausage are very costly too.
And an Asian Russophile critising cabbage...
He's Orthodox, not Roman Catholic, he follows a very different kind of lent.
The forum has an ignore function. I've got that guy on ignore and am spared from reading his posts
Just to correct some irrelevant points made in this thread.
Stalin no longer supported the International when he started his purges. He'd said the only, and all, Marxists were found, and were only to be found, in the Soviet Union and there were no Russian nationalists left in Russia when he started his purges.
Am pretty sure Lenin never went to Britain. Some one is getting Lenin and Marx mixed up. Lenin, and other Russian revolutionaries, plotted the revolution in Switzerland.
Britain supporting Lenin is some modern revisionist lunacy. The British Commonwealth, along with France, the US and Japan were involved, against the Bolsheviks, in the Russian Civil War and had troops fighting and dying there into the 1920's.
Lenin didn't believe in nation states and it's wrong to talk about him "giving" countries independence. In Finland's case Lenin armed Finnish revolutionaries and initiated a violent civil war there, in line with his interpretation of Marx's phrase "withering of the state".
You're a little bit wrong about the period from the 1930's(?) to Stalin's death, there. Stalin didn't believe in international Communism, which at the time (pre World War 2) went by the term the Popular Front. Stalin was trying to fully incorporate the USSR's neighbours.
Even if your correct about the "Brits" vs. Soviets, which you're not, am sure you're parents told you that two wrongs don't make a right.
Suspect Putin never said what you're quoting him as saying. The Soviet Union did fight, against Finland and Poland (as they would hypothetically have had to have fought against Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), due to the M-R pact.
I'd recommend you study the link Jouni posted earlier concerning whether the Soviet Union was about to attack Nazi Germany before the Germans got in first.
Last edited by a moderator: