- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,988
- Likes
- 9,937
Why Su-33 rejected as the aircraft on the AC?
I would guess that the Mig variant, being slightly smaller, would be a little easier to operate from the Gorshkov's deck.Why Su-33 rejected as the aircraft on the AC?
Why Su-33 rejected as the aircraft on the AC?
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/2008/05/india’s-quest-for-an-indigenous-aircraft-carrier.htmlBy now the IN was seriously examining the Russians offer of their 1980s vintage helicopter/VTOL carrier Admiral Gorshkov, and a choice had to be made of a suitable aircraft. The obvious options were the Su-33 (a derivative of the Su-27K selected for operation from the 67,500 ton carrier, Kuznetsov), and the Mig-29K. An evaluation revealed that both aircraft would meet our operational requirements. The Su-33, though more capable, being dimensionally larger would not only not fit in the smaller hangar of the 44,500 ton Gorshkov, but would have marginal wing-tip clearances from the island structure during deck launch. It was, therefore, decided that the Mig-29K would equip the Gorshkov, to be renamed INS Vikramaditya, once it entered Indian service.
The downstream impact of this decision was instantly felt by the ADS programme, and a fresh design exercise was initiated to assess the implications of MiG-29K STOBAR operations on the ADS design. According to the planners, the ship’s basic complement would be a squadron each of MiG-29s and assorted helicopters. The option of operating the upgraded Sea Harriers was also catered for, till the LCA (Navy) received its full operational clearance. The workshops, magazines, deck and lift configurations as well as crew spaces had to be re-worked.
The staff requirements having been finalised in 1999, the ADS emerged, in its definitive form, as a 37,000 ton vessel, to be powered by four LM-2500 gas turbines in COGAG arrangement which would give it a top speed of 28 knots. The 830 foot long angled flight deck would have a set of three arrester wires aft rated to handle aircraft of up to 22 ton all-up weight. A set of jet blast deflectors and hydraulic chocks would be installed to provide a 600 foot deck run for launch of the Mig-29K and LCA (Navy), from the 14 degree ski-jump launch using afterburner. The ship would carry an air group of 30 aircraft and helicopters and would be crewed by about 1400 personnel.
Su-33 can be upgraded to similar standards (Su-30MKI), and the modifications that the MKI would have required to convert into a naval aircraft would have turned them into Su-33MKIs.Secondly, the Su-33 would be inferior to the Su-30MKI in performance, while the KUB is said to be a level better than the existing fulcrums.
Also, Su-33 is an expensive bird which is not worth it since we already have a better variant.
Not before entire supply lines are established.http://www.indiandefencereview.com/2008/05/india’s-quest-for-an-indigenous-aircraft-carrier.html
Read the whole thing its very good.
Su-33 can be upgraded to similar standards (Su-30MKI), and the modifications that the MKI would have required to convert into a naval aircraft would have turned them into Su-33MKIs.
But the TWR of the super bug is less. And all IAC and the Gorshkov have only STOBAR and CATOBAR is not even planned. I dont think the superbug can take off with an effective load without a CATOBAR.If the Super Hornet wins the MMRCA contract then it will be the front runner for any further requirment of a carrier capable fighter
Which had to be established for the Mig-29KNot before entire supply lines are established.
Not before a lot of research bases are established.
Not before years are wasted considering the modifications.
Well That is what I guess what INS Vkrmaditya can board . It is not a huge ship mate. and Mind you 16 MIG 29 KUB 's are hell lot of fire powergood so vikramaditya is going to be operational for 30 years. But isn't 16 mig29k is less I mean in terms of number of fighters.
chandra i have one question is this 16 number is normal load or full combat load. As per my understanding carriers normally doesn't carry the full number of aircrafts it can carry please correct me if I am wrongWell That is what I guess what INS Vkrmaditya can board . It is not a huge ship mate. and Mind you 16 MIG 29 KUB 's are hell lot of fire power
16 fighters with full weapon payload , well if the carier is of size of nimitz class they have a option not to go with full load as they still have invincible fire power . But they can ver well be armed to teethchandra i have one question is this 16 number is normal load or full combat load. As per my understanding carriers normally doesn't carry the full number of aircrafts it can carry please correct me if I am wrong
Relatively the Nimitz class would need to carry a lot more ammunition for 16 planes than what the INS Vikramaditya would require for its 16 planes, Nimitz is a strike carrier, and the Vikramaditya will be a air defense carrier.16 fighters with full weapon payload , well if the carier is of size of nimitz class they have a option not to go with full load as they still have invincible fire power . But they can ver well be armed to teeth
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ins Vikramaditya Completes 1 Year:220 Days At Sea | Indian Navy | 1 | ||
Crazy S Anandan from "Hindu" reporting on INS Vikramaditya | Indian Navy | 6 | ||
Complete Video MODI on INS Vikramaditya | Military Multimedia | 0 | ||
Air Defense System For INS Vikramaditya | Indian Navy | 5 |