India's Moon Exploration Program

mcpo117

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
971
Likes
1,976
Country flag
cross posted


Indias space agency plans nuclear engine for upcoming .for upcoming space exploration missions after chandradayaan 3

I predicted many years ago that all the nuclear powers would be future space powers.
only viable nuclear engine is a fusion engine. The west also has plans for the same. India is lowkey Tokamak researcher that many people don't know. see SST-1. but the west is also looking into fission powered rockets which is totally garbage. India should not look that way.
 

Tactical Doge

π•±π–”π–”π–‘π–˜ π–—π–šπ–˜π– 𝖆𝖓𝖉 π–†π–“π–Œπ–Šπ–‘π–˜ π–‹π–Šπ–†π–—
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
9,925
Likes
60,329
Country flag
only viable nuclear engine is a fusion engine. The west also has plans for the same. India is lowkey Tokamak researcher that many people don't know. see SST-1. but the west is also looking into fission powered rockets which is totally garbage. India should not look that way.
The article is about RTEGs, not thrusting engines
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,923
Likes
48,710
Country flag
only viable nuclear engine is a fusion engine. The west also has plans for the same. India is lowkey Tokamak researcher that many people don't know. see SST-1. but the west is also looking into fission powered rockets which is totally garbage. India should not look that way.
fusion reactors are not developed yet. This would be a fission engine.
Fusion rocket engine after development may take decades afterwards??
why would fission be garbage?? would still be a leap over chemical rockets.
 

karn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
3,671
Likes
15,627
Country flag
only viable nuclear engine is a fusion engine. The west also has plans for the same. India is lowkey Tokamak researcher that many people don't know. see SST-1. but the west is also looking into fission powered rockets which is totally garbage. India should not look that way.
And your basis for saying this is ?
 

mcpo117

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
971
Likes
1,976
Country flag
And you basis for saying this is ?
fission is inherently dangerous. it will absolutely do more harm than good. My basis is the general understanding of fissile material and their adverse effect on the environment. An engine failure would result in catastrophic radioactivity in the atmosphere. Fission is inherently shit.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,923
Likes
48,710
Country flag
My basis is the general understanding of fissile material and their adverse effect on the environment. An engine failure would result in catastrophic radioactivity in the atmosphere. Fission is inherently shit.
How about a THORIUM fuelled fission engine????
 

mcpo117

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
971
Likes
1,976
Country flag
fusion reactors are not developed yet. This would be a fission engine.
Fusion rocket engine after development may take decades afterwards??
why would fission be garbage?? would still be a leap over chemical rockets.
nope! a fission rocket failure would be catastrophic for the atmophere.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,324
Likes
56,412
Country flag
only viable nuclear engine is a fusion engine. The west also has plans for the same. India is lowkey Tokamak researcher that many people don't know. see SST-1. but the west is also looking into fission powered rockets which is totally garbage. India should not look that way.
Article is about RTEGs and RHUs, not science fiction nuclear engines (r*ndi Indian media fooling people as usual).
 

karn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
3,671
Likes
15,627
Country flag
fission is inherently dangerous. it will absolutely do more harm than good. My basis is the general understanding of fissile material and their adverse effect on the environment. An engine failure would result in catastrophic radioactivity in the atmosphere. Fission is inherently shit.
Bruh.. nobody is trying to launch a nuclear powered rocket from the ground . They will send it to a high orbit before starting it. Fission engines already exist and fusion is always 20 years away
 

mcpo117

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
971
Likes
1,976
Country flag
yes or whatever other isotope that can be used?
Thorium-232 is the only naturally occurring isotope of thorium, is a fissionable material but not a fissile one, meaning that it needs high-energy neutrons to undergo fission splitting of atomic nuclei which releases energy that is used for electricity generation. However, when irradiated, thorium-232 undergoes a series of nuclear reactions, eventually forming uranium-233, a fissile material that can be burned up as fuel in nuclear reactors.

So, nope!
 

mcpo117

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
971
Likes
1,976
Country flag
Bruh.. nobody is trying to launch a nuclear powered rocket from the ground . They will send it to a high orbit before starting it. Fission engines already exist and fusion is always 20 years away
I for once want a clean air breathing plasma propulsion jet engine that will work in both in and outside of atmosphere. its pretty simple, take in atmosphere, bombard with microwave and turn it into cold plasma, then use magnetic coils to eject that plasma out nozzles with high thrust. it should have comparable specific impulse to an IC jet engine.

of course you need a fuck load of electricity for that. Fission can get it done, but its dangerous. Fusion is Future.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top