Sanglamorre
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5,968
- Likes
- 27,171
The "you" you are referring to isn't the same. You were replying to someone else.First you said you can not handle propaganda or narrative if a woman in service gets capture by the enemy. I told you that I saw fake men here who started crying like pussies when Abhinandan was captured. Then I categorically mentioned ‘backed by technology’ but you shifted the goal post to Physical fitness.
I have seen the world, travelled 4 continents, there is nothing that a women can not handle today. You need to come out of your saviour of the women complex. Joining Indian Forces is voluntary. Anyone who joins, join to serve. The standards are same for everyone. The day women will be allowed to join as SF combatants they will be tested like their male counterparts.
If anything wrong the adversary do to the captured woman officer they will lose it worse than it they do it to male officer.
Yeah, so if you're aware how 'fake men' started crying about Abhinandan, you're telling me it'll be magically better if a woman is captured and raped on video? Right. Sure the ones joining have steeled themselves. But the country hasn't.
'backed by technology'. Like what exactly? Women sitting on a control panel 1000kms away firing a missile? Because jets can be brought down. Or are we talking about some fantasy power suit that gives them physical strength equal to men? Also, 'backed by tech' contradicts your claim women can do everything men can. By that token they will be absolutely reliant on tech. What do we do it the tech fails? Tell the enemy to bring a woman combatant for fair fight?
Sadly, India isn't stretched into those 4 continents till now. India is still very rustic and has its own traditions. No one is buying the notion savaging a man is going to evoke the same response as savaging a woman. Trying to pretend otherwise is just...
Also, among those 4 continents, what happened after an adversary savaged a woman combatant like Saurabh Kalia?
Now, it seems like you're sure the women are held to exact same physical standards as women in the Indian Army. I call bs. It's an open secret they have to be handled with kid gloves. Like accounts don't exist in this very forum of them having to be pushed by drill seargents to get them to pass. :v
So, you're admitting if something was done to a woman officer there will be more retribution meted out to them Vs a male officer. Why is that so? Is it admitting that in India women are still seen differently than men and consequently...govt has to handle it differently? So, if a women is savaged by Pakis, we *have* to make it "lose it worse", thereby decreasing Govt's manuverability.
Yeah, real winning option there.
Even if they make the physical fitness criteria same and strictly observe it, the political issue will still remain.