Good question.
If Militancy becomes zero i would like us to still keep RR battalions.
I would like to see them as a spear of the Strike Corp and taking of the burden of some airborne units too doing "Commando" jobs there.
I am also really impressed by Armoured and Arty guys doing exceptionally well there.During the time my Old Man was a commander there there used to be called sitting ducks because of limited infantry skill.
But now what i have heard of them is these guys have even performed better than infantry guys.
So better to keep what you are doing good.
I am personally in favour of Regiments like RR and Grenadier with no fucking caste, religion or region identify at all.
All is Well and One Indeed!
You're basically describing Ghatak platoons, maybe they should be expanded to company strength inside each infantry battalion under that eventuality.
+ since independence every new army unit (battalion of service) has been 'all India'- I would like one day for the colonial/martial regiments to be renamed to get rid of ethnic/caste/religious affiliations, that seems far too backwards even for 30 years ago. Either go for state/regional names like the British army or a numeric code like the US army.
Some pretty slick mag transitions there- first time I've seen anything like that with an Indian unit, until now the demonstrated transition/reload drills have been very cumbersome/clumsy.
At this point there doesn't seem to be a huge difference in terms of equipment/capability between the RR and SF btns- human capital is obviously on an entirely different level but that they are this close is a worrying trend.
The SF Units are all about the theatre specialisations in the Conventional roles. If the conventional area ha the element of CI/CT then they operate in the same theatre. They don't move out to other theatres.
From what I understand the non-Northern based SF btns still rotate teams through JK though? Is this also true for the northern SF btns rotating teams through other conventional areas?
Mostly the techniques are same, but how the unit integrates it into its training regime, is up to the unit.
What do you think about the proposal (mooted a while back but as with many of these things no news since) to standardise PARA (SF) selection and basic training at SFTS before sending out 'badged' operators to battalions for their advanced and battalion/AO specific training? It's a more standard system that all top Western SF follow AFAIK that will churn out a more common product?
Few things I learned today, RR guys are qualified for heli rappeling, RR guys use flashbang grenades and even use coupled magazines. Good to see India’s indigenous holographic optic instead of the more common EOTech 512.
Fast roping is a skill taught to pretty much every Indian infantry soldier and at almost every regimental training centre there is a static helicopter tower used for this purpose.