You think the use of proper body armor could have averted this tragedy or at least lessen the extent??
At these extremely close quarters (less than 50m) 7.62*39 bullets will rip through all body armour currently in service anywhere on this planet.
plus there’s always that trade off of bulk vs protection- it’s not practical for these kind of high speed operators to be wearing EOD bomb suits when they are ripping through forests, jungles and mountains.
Practically speaking once they were in this position body armour could not have saved them- no unit in the world would’ve been safe.
I think what he meant to ask was whether it was really necessary to send in the Paras when the location could have simply been cordoned off and then neutralize/capture them once they got out of their hidey-hole eventually. I think it could have been a viable option if the exact location of the tangos could have been pinpointed and even then it would have meant tieing up a sizable amount of force in harsh terrain and weather conditions. Given the circumstances, it was probably not an option.
like you noted above cordons can always be slipped, you need to take the fight to the terrorist, a passive wait and watch approach will only lead to more lives lost in the long run.
Also reading Shiv Aroor’s article it is clear the cordon and search option was taken first but after a few days when the exact location of the terrorists could not be determined the SFs were called in and this was the right call imo. Sending in an infantry unit under these circumstances could’ve been horrific.
like i said, these tactics have been successful to date but you can’t always win.