Indian Ocean Developments

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
Really need to distinguish ordinary commercial activities from 'threats' to Indian's dominance in IOR. Both countries in IOR and China are in pursuit of eco. growth for the well being of the peoples that hardly challenges India's 'maritime security' and shall not be over-hyped.

China bids for Lanka deep water container terminal

A consortium-led by China Merchant Holdings may construct a new deepwater container terminal for Sri Lanka Ports Authority for which negotiations are in final stages, according to a report by Port Technology.

The new port has been necessitated to expand handling capacity and handle larger containerships being deployed on new routes. The new port would increase cargo handling capacity with the addition of three new terminals, Port Technology report added

Construction of the first new container terminal, expected to cost US $400 million, will start in the second quarter of this year on a build-operate-transfer basis, Wickrama said, speaking at a regional port forum in Bandung, Indonesia, earlier this month. Colombo port’s cargo flows are also recovering as trade recovers from recession, Wickrama said.

"Our target for 2010 is four million twenty-foot containers and we are quite confident that we can achieve this target without any difficulty. With the economic recovery in the last two months we experienced a rapid increase in volumes of nearly 20 percent compared to previous years," he told Port Technology.

World events analysis and how they affect Markets

An SLPA statement said that cargo forecasts for Colombo had said the port would be reach maximum capacity of around 4.5 million twenty-foot equivalent container units in 2012.

SLPA has already started improving capacity in the port by increasing the yard space, introducing new quay side and yard gantry cranes and installing a modern terminal operation system. Ship traffic and container volumes in Colombo port slumped in 2009 compared with 2008 because of the trade slowdown caused by recession but began picking up towards the end of the year.

SLPA terminals also lost market share to the private South Asia Gateway Terminals in which conglomerate John Keells Holdings has a big stake. The government is holding talks with the consortium in an effort to enhance the royalty payments to ensure it can repay an Asian Development Bank loan taken to dredge the new port and build a breakwater.
The above for example is attributed to Colombo's optimal location to be developed into a transit hub for shipping lines. Most of such investments are of business sheerly.
 
Last edited:

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,758
Country flag
No one is denying legitimate business. Its the military expansion that is a worry. Most of chinese moves have been less business and more strategically minded. Almost all times to contain India.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
US courts India in the Indian Ocean

US courts India in the Indian Ocean​

By Balaji Chandramohan

At the end of the 10-day joint naval exercise Malabar 10, conducted between India and the United States in the Arabian Sea, it became clear the two countries would further cooperate in the Indian Ocean to counter the rise of China in the years to come. The naval war games were held from April 23 to May 2, with these being the 14th in a series of exercises that began in 1992 after the end of the Cold War.

Unlike last year, this month's exercise was a bilateral rather than a multilateral affair. Countries that participated in the 2009 exercise were absent, including Singapore, Japan and Australia, leading to speculation these nations didn't want to antagonize Beijing. The absence of the Quadrilateral Initiative (known as "Quad" or the "axis of democracy") provides a glaring observation in the Malabar 10 exercise.

The Malabar 10 could be the start of a new great game between




India and China in the Indian Ocean, with the United States acting as a leveler.

Nothing better illustrates the significance of this year's Malabar exercise than the visit of US Navy Chief Admiral Gary Roughead to India ahead of the event. Speaking at a round-table conference held on April 12 organized by the National Maritime Foundation, a naval think-tank based in India, Roughead said that America's leaders at the highest level had declared that the US and India would be strategic partners for the 21st century.

"I'm here to say that the United States Navy in particular is a committed friend to India for the long term."

During the 10-day naval exercise, India's Western Fleet participated in drills with the US's Seventh Fleet. Though the scale of operations was lower this year compared to previous years, Task Force 70 of the Seventh Fleet based in Yokosuka, Japan, brought the cruiser USS Shiloh, the destroyers USS Chafee and USS Lassen and the frigate USS Curts.

In addition, the US deployed a Los Angeles-class nuclear-powered fast attack submarine, the USS Annapol. From the Indian side, the guided missile destroyer INS Mysore and three frigates - INS Godavari, INS Brahmaputra and INS Tabar - were also a part of the operations.

Some of the key focuses of the operations were on anti-submarine warfare, surface firings and maritime interdiction operations, apart from humanitarian assistance and disaster-relief efforts.

There are several main reasons that might explain the increase in India-US naval cooperation. First, the Barack Obama administration does not believe unilateral solutions are available to deal with regional security challenges. Second, India's importance in Washington's eyes as a potential strategic partner has steadily increased because of Delhi's growing economic and military capabilities as well as its strong democratic credentials. Third, both the US and India are concerned about the rising power of China in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond.

Although the US and India want and actively seek strong cooperative relations with Beijing, both are conscious of potential conflicts of interest in bilateral relations with Beijing. This recognition has cumulatively served to bolster US-Indian ties. Washington also now believes that US-Indian political and military cooperation is necessary to counter the very real challenges of international piracy and Islamist terrorism in the Horn of Africa.

From the US's point of view there is a fear that China might intervene forcefully in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. Nearly 44 of the 51 small islands and reefs are claimed by China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei. The conflict stems from overlapping sovereignty claims to various Spratly Islands, which potentially could produce natural resources such as oil, natural gas and seafood. China's aggressive stance is motivated by its need to meet growing energy demands that outstrip its supply capability. The US might be forced to "intervene" and would need a partner in India.

India would not suffer any sleepless nights if the US was ready to counter China's "string of pearls" strategy in the Indian Ocean, which includes courting allies in South Asia and littoral states by providing funds and building ports. This strategy is intent on making sure the Indian Ocean is not India's ocean.

The US's 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) acknowledged India's rise as a military power in the Asia-Pacific and the dominant role its navy could play in years to come. The QDR also mentioned that the US Navy would be deployed in forward positions in the years to come.

Interestingly, the present chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, explained the importance of the navy in the QDR, the first time a naval officer has been chairman since the 1996 QDR.

The wheel has come full circle since the first Malabar exercise in 1992. At that time, Washington had "won" the Cold War against the Soviet Union through a "containment strategy" propagated by American diplomat George Kennan. The US wanted to court India, which had been an ally of the Soviet Union.

The US's geostrategy is also partially based on the concept of the 20th-century Dutch-American geostrategist and the "godfather" of the containment strategy, Nicholas John Spykman. He said that "whoever controlled the Rimland rules Eurasia; whoever rules Eurasia controls the destinies of the world". Typically, the Rimland refers to the maritime fringes of the Eurasian continent.

Spykman emphasized that the US needed partners in the Rimland to counter the rise of the Heartland (Soviet Union) and the Middle Kingdom (China). This is the reason the US continues to court India through the Malabar exercises.
 

ganesh177

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
1,308
Likes
1,657
Country flag
Although russia had their chances to make their presence in indian ocean with the help of india, but they never came forward.

I think Ind and US co-operation in Indian ocean is good news for india, as it will put the chinese mission of string of pearl on back foot.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
A new power equation is arising in Indian Ocean

A new power equation is arising in Indian Ocean



In a three-part feature, C Raja Mohan, Strategic Affairs Editor with the Indian Express, analyses the unfolding geopolitical change in the Indian Ocean and dwells at some length on the challenges that it poses for India's foreign and security policies.

Changes in the distribution of power, historians hold, are the main source of systemic conflict in world politics. The rise of new powers and the decline of the old sets up the context for destabilizing struggles for rebalancing the world.

Either preventing the power transition from one great power to another or facilitating it involves much bloodletting. One of the big debates in international politics today is whether we (India) are on the cusp of a power transition in the Indian Ocean, the Asia Pacific and the world at large.

Some argue that the relative decline of the United States is inevitable and a reorganization of the balance of power in the Indian and Pacific Oceans is necessary amidst the rise of China and the emergence of India. Others argue that structural change in the geopolitics of the Indian Ocean may be inevitable, but not imminent.

Nothing is assured in the life of nations

Some insist that the United States will remain the pre-eminent power in the world and in our own littoral. Either way there is no denying the new imperatives for some structural adjustment in the region amidst the unfolding change in the regional and global distribution of power. For China is about to become the second largest economy in the world.

India is inching its way to become the third largest in the next couple of decades if not earlier. The rapid accretion of economic power means Beijing and Delhi will be able to devote a part of it to acquiring a stronger military muscle.

For a long time to come China and India will be countries with low per capita incomes. Yet given the large size of their population, Beijing and Delhi can become major military powers by spending a small portion of their GDP on defence in a sustained and purposeful manner.

Put another way, China and India can become powerful without being rich in the traditional per capita sense. While all trend lines point to the inevitable emergence of China and India as great powers, nothing is assured in the life of nations.

India and China will have to earn their greatness

Recall the debate on the rising Japan a quarter century ago. Remember too the celebrated 'declinist' literature on the United States at the end of 1980s. It was the Soviet Union that collapsed against all expectations and the United States bounced back.

China and India have enormous internal problems and their leaderships could either stumble or over-reach -- both of which could delay or destroy their much-awaited moment in the sun.

In any case, China and India will have to earn their greatness; I doubt it will be simply thrust upon them. Having entered those caveats let's turn to some of the important geopolitical consequences of China's rise and India's emergence, with a focus on the maritime context. Allow me take up five themes.

The first is the nature of the economic transformation in China and India that is fundamentally different from that of Soviet Russia -- the previous challenger to Anglo-American primacy in the world. In the first half of the 20th century, Stalin extracted every possible ounce of human and material resource at home to make Russia a great military power.

India and China will reconfigure littoral's geopolitical space

China and India, in contrast, are elevating their international standing through economic globalization and regional integration. Soviet Russia disconnected itself from the world economy as it rose. China and India are deepening their ties to the world economy, as they become major powers. Their extraordinary international exposure today is marked by the fact that trade forms nearly 70 per cent of China's GDP and closer to 35 per cent and rising in India.

Second, the increase in the economic mass of China and India will intensify their gravitational pull and most certainly reconfigure the geopolitical space in the littoral of the Indian Ocean and the Asia Pacific.

This would mean a restructuring of the relationships among major powers and regional actors. In my view the most important 'strategic triangle' in our littoral and the maritime world will be that between the United States, China and India.

While other major powers like Russia, Japan, France and medium powers like Korea, Indonesia, Australia and Iran to name a few will indeed have a bearing on the maritime structures of the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, it is the triangular dynamic between Washington, Beijing and Delhi that will be the most consequential.

India and China are today more reliant on the seas than ever

There are many ways in which the triangular relationship could unfold. Some Americans see the importance of accommodating the rise of China through the construction of a condominium; some others see India as a natural balancer against China's rise. Yet other Americans argue that Washington must balance against both Beijing and Delhi.

Some in Beijing worry that India's naval power, acting in collaboration with the United States and Japan, could hit at the vital maritime interests of China.

There are others in Beijing who speculate that the rise of Indian naval power is a threat to the United States rather than to China. Delhi is itself quite coy about identifying the hierarchy of its threats. Standing with Chinese leaders we talk about the promotion of a multipolar world; shaking hands with the Americans we proclaim a natural alliance with the United States.

Third, the logic of globalization and trade means China and India are today more reliant on the seas than ever before in their history. Nearly 90 per cent of world trade in commodities and goods continues to flow by the seas. China's per capita income today is around $4000 and India's a little over $1000.

Heading towards building blue water navies

As their per capita incomes continue to grow rapidly, it is not difficult to see that the scale and scope of Chinese and Indian interaction with the rest of the world will be breath-taking.

The more integrated China and India become with the world economy, greater are their stakes at sea. If oceans are the lifelines for the economic well-being of nearly two and a half billion people, Beijing and Delhi are bound to invest heavily -- in diplomatic and military terms -- in the management of the order in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

Fourth, unlike in the past when China and India emphasized their autarky, their growing interdependence with the rest of the world now demands more supple and complex military strategies to realise their transformed national interests. As the most versatile of the military instruments, the navies will become increasingly weighty in the strategic calculus of China and India.

Both Beijing and Delhi have begun to increase the share of resources devoted to their Navies. This would mean a steady expansion of the size and quality of Chinese and Indian naval forces. It is also clear that both Beijing and Delhi will move towards building blue water navies.

Rediscovering their naval heritage...

That Chinese and Indian security interests go beyond the local and regional is underlined by the fact that the economic prospects of their large populations are dependent on access to vital natural resources and markets in distant lands. Powerful blue water navies, then, become inevitable adjuncts to the globalizing economies of China and India.

Fifth, this Chinese and Indian interest in acquiring maritime power marks a historic break from the strategic traditions. Naval nationalists in both China and India do speak of the ancient maritime traditions of their respective nations.

China has made special effort to rediscover its naval heritage and elevate the maritime consciousness of its people. In India the belief in the past greatness is equally intense, while the collective effort to express it is far less impressive.

While China has Admiral Zheng He and India has Rajaraja Chola as maritime heroes, it would not be inaccurate to state that the naval orientation in China and India has at best been episodic. The principal security threats in both China and India were from their land frontiers, and interestingly from the same direction, the northwest.

The Chinese preoccupation with barbarian invasions from the northwest saw the building of a great wall, and India had to devote most of defence energies to the stabilization of the region between the Indus and the Hindu Kush. That did not leave much time and space for the sustained development of naval capabilities, despite being blessed with long coastlines.
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
india will always be overshadowed by the big P----Pakistan.........and not just on the cricket field.........

not only will pak continue to mount terrorist attacks in india , china will actively aid pak by supplying nuclear weapons ,ballistic and cruise missiles ,and will be thus successful in keeping india down.

india becoming part of a power equation is a big joke ,not only considering our present , but also our past where we have always been invaded ,and conquered by foreigners ,and never have succeeded in asserting our power over our neighbours since time immemorial .
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,758
Country flag
Times are changing doc.. India is exerting its power and influence. Our navy is not acquiring those boats for nothing and all those force multipliers too.
 

ankur

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
0
i think one of the persistent problems with ondia becoming as a major power is lack of political will to deal with internal as well as external threats.also i think very few in india have a long term vision as to where india should stand in the changing world.
 

NikSha

Regular Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
337
Likes
3
We can already see the rise of India as a major power. The way Chitamanabarampam.. whatever.. handled Naxals is mind-blowing.

Can't wait to see these people roll out the red carpet for the chini-pak invasion force.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
i think one of the persistent problems with ondia becoming as a major power is lack of political will to deal with internal as well as external threats.also i think very few in india have a long term vision as to where india should stand in the changing world.
most of times indian leaders were in the age bracket of 60-80 yrs which is the age of retiring and Vanaprasth( Age when person who is living in the forest as a hermit after partially giving up material desires.).So they always end up talking peace and chose the path of least resistance.Bring on the young leaders with strategic vision.
 

ankur

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
0
i have read an article from IDSA about the new concept called"air sea battle concept" .although this concept has to do with US's strategy of dealing with china/iran robust and increasing area denial/anti-access strategy but i want to ask here, given that the article argued for IN to learn something out of this strategy wrt to PLAN expansion in IOR region that can anyone outline some of the steps needed to fulfill this strategy.off course a general sense of this concept calls for synchronisation of IN and IAF in carrying out their operations.
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
Singapore and Indonesian navies concludes 'Exercise Eagle'

SURABAYA (BNS): The Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) and the Indonesian Navy (TNI AL) have concluded the bilateral exercise codenamed Exercise Eagle, at Surabaya.

According to the Singapore Ministry of Defence, the 21st bilateral exercise was conducted from 28th July to 5th August 2010, at both shore and sea phases of Singapore and Surabaya, Indonesia.

Two maritime patrol aircraft and four ships from both navies participated in the Exercise
Eagle 2010.


The RSN's missile corvette RSS Vigour, the TNI AL's Diponegoro-class corvette KRI Sultan Hasanuddin and the RSN's Formidable-class frigate RSS Tenacious at Exercise Eagle 2010. Photo: Singapore MoD.
The RSN Formidable-class frigate and a Diponegoro-class corvette from the TNI AL had participated for the first time in the exercise.

During the sea phase, both navies conducted a series of exercises involving anti-surface warfare, maritime interdiction as well as search and rescue operations.

The personnel of RSN and TNI AL also interacted in the cultural and sporting events to strengthen the camaraderie between the two navies.

Since 1974, both navies are participating in the exercise to strengthen the defence ties between the two nations.




http://www.brahmand.com/news/Singapore-and-Indonesian-navies-concludes-Exercise-Eagle/4671/1/10.html
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,758
Country flag
'India, US need to partner to balance China in Indian Ocean'

WASHINGTON: With China increasing its military power and influence in the strategically crucial Indian Ocean, a noted American expert has urged the Obama administration to partner India to balance and counter Beijing's increasing influence in the region.

As the Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly important to China's economic and security interests, Dean Cheng of the Heritage Foundation said that Beijing appears to be pursuing what has been widely known as a "string of pearls" strategy of cultivating India's neighbours as friendly states, both to protect its economic and security interests and to balance a "rising India".

With Chinese influence in the region growing, it is essential that the US not fall behind in the Indian Ocean, but maintain a steady presence in the region, both to signal its resolve to stay engaged and to avoid the difficulties of reentering a region, Cheng wrote.

He said for the foreseeable future, Chinese strategic planners will need to pay increasing attention to China's Indian Ocean flank.

In the short term, Beijing is concerned about its growing dependence on the sea lanes of communications for sustaining China's economic growth.

In 2010, for the first time, China imported more than 50 per cent of its oil consumption. Chinese President Hu Jintao has already raised the issue of the Malacca Strait.

"There is little question that it is a key choke-point on China's oil supply routes. Part of China's interest in developing alternative ports and pipelines, such as in Pakistan and Burma, would seem to be motivated by a desire to reduce the criticality of the Malacca Strait," he said.

"Even if China's oil lifeline did not have to transit the Strait of Malacca, it would nonetheless traverse significant portions of the Indian Ocean. The growth of the Indian navy means that Chinese economic development is potentially at the mercy of India, as well as the United States. The forging of Indian security links with Japan and the United States is therefore a source of concern," he noted.

Read more: 'India, US need to partner to balance China in Indian Ocean' - India - The Times of India 'India, US need to partner to balance China in Indian Ocean' - India - The Times of India
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,838
Given the ethos of the governments of India, partner India will never be, even with the pro US PM.

At best, it will be some vague stuff like 'strategic partner' whatever that means.

To be partners, there has to be a common strategic perspective and service facilities opened to each other!

There is no doubt that some serious thinking is done and India strengthened to undertake its rightful role in the IOR.
 

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,303
Likes
38,717
Country flag
If US navy increase its presence in a show of strength, in the South China sea and in the Pacific close to Taiwan Korea Vietnam and Japan ,just to show the Chinese Navy that " Look We are a bigger power" , then I believe the Chinese Navy will simply loose interest in the Indian Ocean and China will look to secure its own backyard first
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Partner with India to stop what? We certainly don't want the Chinese to stop their anti-piracy patrols. It is the first constructive thing they have ever done. US has enough bases to do what they need to do. As a member of NATO, French bases are open to their ships and we have them all over the IOR. Not to mention Australia, Singapore, UK territories and all the bases in the Persian Gulf.
 

neo29

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
1,284
Likes
30
We need to invite an ally who is already in competition with China. US is the perfect candidate.

We also must build better relations with Vietnam especially in military co-operation who has issues with China in South China sea.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
India can't rely on teaming up with anyone. It needs to do exactly what it is doing. Placing MKI in the areas where China MIGHT try to militarise a base. If China is dumb enough to place military personnel so far away from their borders, they will not able to protect it from IAF strikes. The billions they invested in ports can be destroyed in 24 hours.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
What can India offer to US as a 'partner'? Give a few naval bases to the US? or place big orders for defence?

If India really has a mind big enough as a 'great power', India shouldn't have made her neighbors prone to be part of that fictioned 'string of pearls' for China. India clearly has never been self reflecting on why all neighbors (probably except Bhutan) feel shadowed by India although India claims to be richest democracy in SA. Look at China, we're investing and aiding SA counties and reaping benefits from mutual development.

And China is diversifying energy sourcing from Russia (via pipelines under construction) and even VEnezuela and Brazil through $$ loans during crisis. And now projects in Baltisan/Gilgit PAK... Sooner or later that Malacca chokepoint will be a bygone for China's resources lifeline.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
some great hot stuff on this thread !

referring to a bit from everyoone - yes a vague term like strategic partnet - well it's a start and better than nothing - and after all any project needs to start somewhere - secondly we need to enlist the participation of all neighbours whatever their relationship with prc may be - it needs to start somewhere and the bottom and "nebulous" is a great place to start.

you see ALL prc's neighbours have territorial issues with china , even countries like malaysia or indonesia which have placating policies currently with prc do have naval territorial issues eg natunas islands parsleys spratleys etc marine gas fiels etc are all issues - so ther is place for india to get involved and - so INR should consider and initiate something , anything - just make a start and the next stop will show up
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top