Super falcon
Regular Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 870
- Likes
- 806
I bet you F 18 will win the contract and it is better than rafales in naval warfare big mistake if Rafales selected
US will not give out any aircraft carrier. IN wants the UK version of it but with the EM catapult.Indian navy won't settle for less than 3 aircraft carriers but third one will come beyond 2030 but they want F 18 so they get use to it
USA will give a retired one to counter china uk version is very expensive to maintainUS will not give out any aircraft carrier. IN wants the UK version of it but with the EM catapult.
US will not give an aircraft carrier to us and neither do we want to purchase/acquire any sort of Aircraft Carrier from US, we can design, develop and construct our own Aircraft Carriers.USA will give a retired one to counter china uk version is very expensive to maintain
No US super carrier for India or any other.USA will give a retired one to counter china uk version is very expensive to maintain
US consider selling their lpd or lhd[if IN pays well] but no super carrier for any other country including uk.US will not give an aircraft carrier to us and neither do we want to purchase/acquire any sort of Aircraft Carrier from US, we can design, develop and construct our own Aircraft Carriers.
If in the near future we want to build our own Nuclear Powered Aircraft carrier with EMALS than we will at the most ask for some consultation in the design. Our Shipyards are more than capable to build Carriers with displacement of 70,000 tons (i.e Cochin Shipyard).
[For more information refer to GOOGLE]
USA will give a retired one to counter china uk version is very expensive to maintain
Three significant advantages of F-18E/F block III
1. GaN based AN/APG-79 radar with unmatched performance. (More peak power, more TRM, newer generation than RBE-AA)
2. Twin seater deck capacity: allows seamless F-18 training from AC and not some land based facility. Rafale-M is single seat only and its twin seater version will only be based on shore.
3. High level data exchange/ integration with P-8I/MH-60/ Sea Guardian drones. That's because they all are US made and currently used by USN in that configuration.
Additionally, lower price, folding wings, NATO weapons compatibility, dedicated EW (Growler) option, anti-radiation missiles - do not exist on Rafale.
Bro your navy with hornets want to go against china not Pakistan yes these jets will some how over power both china and pakistanThe Hornets then better not come with a bullshit "please don't use against pakis" clause.
Yes but third AC for IN should be caterpault launch is a requirement by IN I thought since IN happy with us weapons more likely us AC might be the contenderUS consider selling their lpd or lhd[if IN pays well] but no super carrier for any other country including uk.
I don't consider the Pakistan Navy a major threat. Nevertheless I want our forces to be able to use all of their assets as they see fit. Do we really need Hornets against Pakistan ? No. Do we want the option of using them against Pakistan if the need arises ? Definitely yes.Bro your navy with hornets want to go against china not Pakistan yes these jets will some how over power both china and pakistan
And why US will grant us that (condition-free)?If India is going to select FA-18 SH over Rafale-M than we need to ensure that uncle Sam does not impose any such conditions, we should be able to use these jets however we like and against who ever we want to use.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Does the Indian Navy need fewer capital warships and more corvettes? | Indian Navy | 21 | ||
Indian Navy eyes expansion with three more Russian-made Krivak IV frigates | Indian Navy | 7 | ||
More Israeli UAV for Indian navy | Indian Navy | 4 | ||
Y | More Talwar Class for Indian Navy | Indian Navy | 288 |