bhavesh100
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2009
- Messages
- 279
- Likes
- 352
Thanks. Can it go below 500 meters? Can it be launched from sub?Varuna is Varunastra "heavyweight torpedo" made by DRDO:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varunastra_(torpedo)
Thanks. Can it go below 500 meters? Can it be launched from sub?Varuna is Varunastra "heavyweight torpedo" made by DRDO:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varunastra_(torpedo)
Varunastra is heavyweight torpedo.What is Varuna? others I get it.
No submarines have been tested go beyond 500 meter depth. I don't think torpedoes can go that low. But I am unsure of this.Thanks. Can it go below 500 meters? Can it be launched from sub?
The bigger the hull the harder it is to keep from buckling under the pressure. That is why deep diving rescue subs are as small as they can make them.Few goes below 500 meters. $$$$$$$
The usual. Barack Sam and bramhos antiship most probably. As for numbers it will match what 2000ton frigate carry. Check any 2000ton frigate on wiki and get an idea also postback here.It has been said that the Saryu class can be outfitted as a light frigate in a conflict scenario. Are we talking about outfitting with anti ship missiles and SAMs? How many and which ones?
The whole concept in my eyes is quite daft.It has been said that the Saryu class can be outfitted as a light frigate in a conflict scenario. Are we talking about outfitting with anti ship missiles and SAMs? How many and which ones?
So, according to you conflict happens all of a sudden within a few weeks? It takes months and one can notice the enemy preparing for war. Also, the short limited war is just skirmish. We don't prepare extensively for skirmishes. They are just tactical ploys, not strategic measureThe whole concept in my eyes is quite daft.
On one hand the military say they expect short conflicts. Yet they maintain they can outfit a Patrol ship to Frigate standard when war breaks out.
Its quite likely the war will end before the ship can be converted.
This whole conversion matter is a nice thing to put on paper, but is quite impractical in a conflict scenario.
My 2 cents.
I take your point but I was referring to the time a particular dock will take to finish the conversion.So, according to you conflict happens all of a sudden within a few weeks? It takes months and one can notice the enemy preparing for war. Also, the short limited war is just skirmish. We don't prepare extensively for skirmishes. They are just tactical ploys, not strategic measure
Balakot was a surgical strike, not a war. In this case, we just calculated in current scenario, India has much higher strength than Pakistan and can crush Pakistan, even though some losses were expected. But the objectives were only limited in nature. And it was noted that Pakistan also had limited supplies and equipment to escalate.I take your point but I was referring to the time a particular dock will take to finish the conversion.
And I am not the one promulgating the theory of short sudden wars, the military is.
Just look at Balakot for example. How many of us even thought a week before Pulwama that such a skirmish will happen?
Major war is something like "desert storm" of Iraq. The problem with looking at Balakot at big war is not just limited time but lack of logistics to fight beyond a certain time period. India does not have petroleum to fight wars and will have to use coal liquefaction. So, the first step of fighting any major war will be to start coal liquefaction. Without coal liquefaction, any other aspect like modifying OPV to frigate is useless as none of them will have fuel to run with!This is as close to a conflict we will ever get. Now tell me if we hadn't de-escalated and decided to launch punitive thrusts accross the border would the navy have had time to put the Saryu class in dry-dock?
My take is that the Navy in the face of conflict will most likely see it wiser to deploy the Saryu class on SLoC or deterrent patrols rather than let them languish at a shipyard.
Hence I think the conversion boast is just a paper metric rather than a meaningful strategy.
If India intends to fight a big war or sees someone else preparing logistics for the same, then India will have an option of converting OPV to frigate.The only way I see the conversion to Frigate standard coming to pass - Heavens forbid it happens - is if the Navy takes a beating and combat capable ships are needed pronto.
Wrong here.My argument is not around whether wars will be sudden or have a long buildup. Im saying in either case we will not have the time to convert the Saryu, when their capabilities can be applied elsewhere.
Navy doesn't need to fit patrol ship with missiles for short conflict anyway. It has plenty of firepower to take on anyone foolish enough to challenge it on home turf.The whole concept in my eyes is quite daft.
On one hand the military say they expect short conflicts. Yet they maintain they can outfit a Patrol ship to Frigate standard when war breaks out.
Its quite likely the war will end before the ship can be converted.
This whole conversion matter is a nice thing to put on paper, but is quite impractical in a conflict scenario.
My 2 cents.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian navy railgun development | Indian Navy | 75 | ||
Very concerned with development of Indian navy: Pakistan naval chief | Indian Navy | 10 | ||
W | Adani PLR system deliver 500 Masada made in India pistol to Indian navy | Indian Navy | 0 | |
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 |