well seeing as how SOCOM has gone back to the DI guns and ditched the hk416, i think i would believe them rather than some random marine.
ak test
Ar15 test.
as you will see the ar is much more reliable in mud and sand, due to its closed system.
the US military isnt stupid to continue to rely on the ar15 for this long. A recent survey on the US army concluded more than 90% of the soldiers were satisfied with their weapon.
The only thing good about the ak is it runs without any maintenance.
SOCOM uses a lot of weapons including HK 416 variants.
The JSOC elements also use HK 416.
AR DI platforms are improving and so are piston operated systems<getting lighter and less recoil> but there is a need for more reliable gas piston variants in diff situations.
This guy doing a test isn't with a Russian AK <best in market>, the Ak may have malfunctioned because of barrel, poor maintenance or even been tweaked to fail.There are hundreds of videos where AR DI rifles have stoppages for N number of reasons and an AK shoots straight.
AR has closed system and the tolerances are the reason why it has stoppages compared to loose AK system.More space for the action to happen in AK. If the dust cover is open and dirt gets in it will eventually mess up the system and cause a stoppage. Caracal 816 is AR gas piston for sand and dust of Arab lands to be more reliable.
US ARMY believes in:
Tradition>What they have in inventory>Price >Operator needs .......
in that order.
They have way too many ARs to abandon going for a complete change except in small units of Tier 1 operators or USMC. Plus DI AR have served them well and are lighter.But the future is piston driven ARs and as soon as they see a rifle being equally lighter and accurate and ofcourse cheaper, they would change to more reliable gas piston ARs.
All tier 1 groups in Europe are beginning to field piston ARs because they understand the correct order.
Reliability,Durability,Accurate,Affordable.
Guess what the smart thing was done by the Poles who had 5.56 AK, the Archer, after the integration with NATO.Something that shoots accurate like AR and brings the reliability of AK platforms.
DI ARs aren't bad, just that in a SHTF situation that random marine wouldn't trust it.The USMC and the French Army, Norwegian SF etc are adopting piston ARs.
DI's work fine but pistons are way more reliable anyday.
And don't believe those surveys they do of satisfaction with M4 carbines...It would be like doing a satisfaction survey with INSAS among Indian soldiers if done without bias by the decision makers.