Yes in the future .. right now in trials .Does India already have wheeled self-propelled howitzers, or does it have a possibility of doing so in the future?
Yes in the future .. right now in trials .Does India already have wheeled self-propelled howitzers, or does it have a possibility of doing so in the future?
Hope its not having half a meter loading tray jotting out at back.
Can't help.Hope its not having half a meter loading tray jotting out at back.
I prefer the term: KHICHDI navy.Frankenstein Navy
Mix-fried rice Navy, even more nutritious.I prefer the term: KHICHDI navy.
Khichdi be nutritious after all
its fine to have that tray while deployment. But during Mobility it should have collapsible/foldable mechanism.Can't help.
Its designed to hold Zone 7 charges. The length of BMCS in that case would be 1 metre.
Not practical and really not of so much importance anyway.its fine to have that tray while deployment. But during Mobility it should have collapsible/foldable mechanism.
ahh I see we are talking across each other. I am talking about ATAGS + Modified Tatra platform based MGS system. My mistake I quoted wrong post. I wanted to quote this postNot practical and really not of so much importance anyway.
View attachment 231555
This is how they are going to tow it, so the breech loader bridge is anyway not going to matter in transportation.
Ok.ahh I see we are talking across each other. I am talking about ATAGS + Modified Tatra platform based MGS system. My mistake I quoted wrong post. I wanted to quote this post
View attachment 231557
right but bottom one is think Dhanush based not ATAGS so cant compare. And in MGS case some with Clever Engineering the tray can be folded down. IIRC some French or Israeli one MG have similar feature.Ok.
But in this case too, I believe this
View attachment 231560
is much cleaner and ergonomic then this
View attachment 231561
Yes, it can be done. But from developer point of view, you would not want to. It would create one additional point of failure. This bridge is generally seen in howitzers with self loading capability.right but bottom one is think Dhanush based not ATAGS so cant compare. And in MGS case some with Clever Engineering the tray can be folded down. IIRC some French or Israeli one MG have similar feature.
Yes. Level of automation in MGS has been kept upto the level of Bofors and ATAGS which is good from user point of view.@Chinmoy In Archer Housing is just not cover for semi manual but its completely automated Loading(Both Shell and Charge) , disposal of spent charge. Loading etc. They can all be done from within Driver Box. I am trying to get length of MGS system but in MGS - in addition to overhang of the Layering Station (which both Ceasar and MGS have as an Overhang - a design necessity for making ease of operation), MGS has rammer Tray overhang. The ceaser doesnt have the same - It albiet has different loading mechanism. MGS one is very inspired from existing Bofors Loading Mechanism.
View attachment 231577
On the move its the Big Spade of the Caesar jotting out(which being sturdy part of artillery, should be ok jutting out), not the rammin tray.While on move, as you could see from the pic I posted, these are kept in a horizontal position just like MGS.
EMM, actually both are two different system. The previous one you showed was a 8x8 based system as opposed of this 6x6.On the move its the Big Spade of the Caesar jotting out(which being sturdy part of artillery, should be ok jutting out), not the rammin tray.
View attachment 231592