There is already couple of mig 21 sqd in Kashmir may be that's why. Also Mig 21 is a message to Porks that we took your F-16 down with this...
i think uttam is better
mark20x.blogspot.com
Yoi think uttam is better
read this
Thoughts About the New Uttam AESA RADAR- MK1A (and some other stuff)
Uttam AESA radar upgraded 992 TRM modules, range, RCS, Mk1A
in this blog there is photo of uttam keeping lock on tejas at a dist of 140 km and rcs of uttam is 0.5-1 m2 (imo) and peak power is 3.6 as compared to 4 of this chene radar. in this brochure it is vaugly written range of radar 170km for fighter size so we can consider (1.5-2.5 m2) rcs.
if we go by this analysis then uttam is better.
What wholesome sirji , in the first pic its a mig 21 mongol not even a bison but mig 21 mongol .
Don't go by the looks. Nobody knows the original specs of these two radars, except for their users. So don't take those detection numbers seriously. What important here is that the bandwidth of that chinese radar. It's 3 ghz, so it's in the same class of ultra wideband radar as RBE2, An/apg 79. Whereas our Uttam's bandwidth isn't even 3 ghz and as per the article bars is the worse as it's still in mhz level. I don't know if you'll like it or not even an ultra wideband equipped jf17 would slaughter our bars equipped MKIs mile away. If anyone here is a radar expert could you please explain it with more detailsi think uttam is better
read this
Thoughts About the New Uttam AESA RADAR- MK1A (and some other stuff)
Uttam AESA radar upgraded 992 TRM modules, range, RCS, Mk1A
in this blog there is photo of uttam keeping lock on tejas at a dist of 140 km and rcs of uttam is 0.5-1 m2 (imo) and peak power is 3.6 as compared to 4 of this chene radar. in this brochure it is vaugly written range of radar 170km for fighter size so we can consider (1.5-2.5 m2) rcs.
if we go by this analysis then uttam is better.
that's uttam mk1 trms in 2-3 yrs new trms will come and this issue will be resolved. And about this jf17 tayyara idont know much abt electronic warfare.
This is the input power consumption of the radar, not the peak power,i think uttam is better
read this
Thoughts About the New Uttam AESA RADAR- MK1A (and some other stuff)
Uttam AESA radar upgraded 992 TRM modules, range, RCS, Mk1A
in this blog there is photo of uttam keeping lock on tejas at a dist of 140 km and rcs of uttam is 0.5-1 m2 (imo) and peak power is 3.6 as compared to 4 of this chene radar. in this brochure it is vaugly written range of radar 170km for fighter size so we can consider (1.5-2.5 m2) rcs.
if we go by this analysis then uttam is better.
भाई कुछ ज्यादा नहीं हो गया ?
Read tenders , I think we may find something there
see the date in bottom right corner 8-dec-2017 many thing might have improved till now
Nope rwr Ng has come , now that will be integrated on rest
tell us something if you have found there
Bilkul nahi. PESA radars are obsolete infront of an ultra wideband. MKI's huge RCS + LPI, Jamming and Anti jamming capability of an ultra wideband radar is literally a nail in the coffin for a fighter like MKI unless we upgrade MKI with better radar and EW systems
I will start doing it after 3 October , but till now I have seen lot of tsa , Vivaldi etc , our seeker tsa is quite good too .
TSA i don't know but Vivaldi, yes there are vivaldi antennas for missile seeker by a private company. I don't think Vivaldi always mean TSA as RBE2 and KFX's radar also uses Vivaldi antennas as well as F22's radar and i'm pretty sure those two radar isn't anywhere near F22's an/apg 77. I've heard both F22 and F35's radar has bandwidth of 5+ ghz making it one of the most powerful radar in this freaking world
