India Strikes Against Pakistani Terrorism 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

IndiaRising

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
2,788
Likes
9,592
Country flag
The main thread connecting every single event following Feb 14 has been Modi's re-election, a textbook brinkmanship. Pakistan did Pulwama to weaken Modi's electoral prospects. India apparently de-escalated from its Feb 28 position because it got assurances from the US, UK, and France that they'd do something different this time in getting JeM on the UNSC-1267 list. Those three countries probably gambled at the time that if they just focused on delivering on their "sweetener" (return of PoW), domestic pressure on Modi and Modi's own political will, would buckle under the weight of elections by the time the 1267 amendment came up for vote at the UNSC mid-March.

Now we are back to February 28, and the pressure is back on Modi to make sure he delivers on an electoral promise to get JeM to book. Getting JeM on to UNSC-1267 would have gone a long way, as it would have been a huge diplomatic victory, and he would have virtually closed the case on Pulwama to focus on the elections. He will now either have to escalate and push South Asia to the 99th percentile of Nuclear War and drag world powers back to the table, or suffer a catastrophic foreign policy failure by not delivering on his "decisive battle against terror" promise, which will come with electoral costs. Pulwama itself may have been avenged by the Balakot strikes, but Pakis entering our airspace in broad daylight despite Su-30MKI CAPs, and dropping bombs with the intent to harm Indian military installations, remains an unanswered provocation that was an escalation.
Banning huawei or significantly raising import duties on chinese products is need of the hour too
 

aarav

जय परशुराम‍।
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
1,408
Likes
5,399
Country flag
This whole exercise was necessary to show our citizens as well as western countries that china backs terrorists ,now it is time raise emotions against china as well ,what we need is a citizens to boycott china
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
7,420
Likes
12,945
Country flag
So China fucked INDIA just 60 minutes before....
No ... china is trying to save its a$$ in Pakistan. Every one knows that JeM is a like branch of Pakistan Army. For west and democratic countries Pakistan army is the official entity for Arabs and Islamic countries pakistani army and terror groups are shown as mujahideen army.

It is clear that the world is agreeing on India’s concerns and terror issues. India has the option to strike terror and I am sure GoI has good plan and initiatives in this regard.
 
Last edited:

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
Does this action makes CPEC assets legit targets ?
__________________________________________
 

Kazah

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
929
Likes
3,495

how is this diplomatic win when only one country supported them?

It seems more like a lollipop for pakistani awam after a silence on balakot strikes . Nice balancing act but it will backfire.
 

neel9821

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
224
Likes
913
Country flag
The main thread connecting every single event following Feb 14 has been Modi's re-election, a textbook brinkmanship. Pakistan did Pulwama to weaken Modi's electoral prospects. India apparently de-escalated from its Feb 28 position because it got assurances from the US, UK, and France that they'd do something different this time in getting JeM on the UNSC-1267 list. Those three countries probably gambled at the time that if they just focused on delivering on their "sweetener" (return of PoW), domestic pressure on Modi and Modi's own political will, would buckle under the weight of elections by the time the 1267 amendment came up for vote at the UNSC mid-March.

Now we are back to February 28, and the pressure is back on Modi to make sure he delivers on an electoral promise to get JeM to book. Getting JeM on to UNSC-1267 would have gone a long way, as it would have been a huge diplomatic victory, and he would have virtually closed the case on Pulwama to focus on the elections a hero. He will now either have to escalate and push South Asia to the 99th percentile of nuclear war and drag world powers back to the table, or suffer a catastrophic foreign policy failure by not delivering on his "decisive battle against terror" promise, which will come with electoral costs. Pulwama itself may have been avenged by the Balakot strikes, but Pakis entering our airspace in broad daylight despite Su-30MKI CAPs, and dropping bombs with the intent to harm Indian military installations, remains an unanswered provocation that was an escalation.
Very well articulated!

I think the country shouldn’t wait for next attack to punish Pakis. We need to be more proactive and keep bombing the terror factories based on intel inputs. We need to take this fight to their home and make them pay dearly
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
I think we have caught shark by baiting shrimp. China's hyphenation with Pakistan is now complete.

US has already called China one of the worst human right abuser
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/soc...lls-china-one-worst-regimes-human-rights-2018

.....

Something big is being cooked.
_____________________________________________________
The easiest way we can prove to the world that we're not pawns in their proxy-war is by taking unilateral action against Pakistan. Fast, hard, and lasting. Dial hostilities back to Feb 27-levels.
 

Enquirer

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,567
Likes
9,357
Does this action makes CPEC assets legit targets ?
__________________________________________
Not yet!
First India should target the numerous jihadi facilities......forcing Pakis to target Indian military installation (as there are no terrorist camps in India)....then India targets Paki military..............Pakis will then target Indian infrastruture........then India could go after Paki infrastructure including CPEC!!!!
 

Jaymax61

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2019
Messages
584
Likes
2,207
Not yet!
First India should target the numerous jihadi facilities......forcing Pakis to target Indian military installation (as there are no terrorist camps in India)....then India targets Paki military..............Pakis will then target Indian infrastruture........then India could go after Paki infrastructure including CPEC!!!!
India will NEVER touch CPEC locations. Its a needless and reckless step that gives China a legitimate reason to step in. Then we have a two front conflict we are not ready for. We have Pakistan by the balls. Why draw in the Chinks and divert our attention.

Smash Pakistan, push back the LoC and bring CPEC roads in striking range. Ignite Balochistan and step up Chabahar port to dilute the impact of Gwadar. China will be forced to play nice. Sometimes the threat of a strike is more valuable than an actual strike
 

SanjeevM

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
1,631
Likes
4,503
Country flag

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk
Point 4 is good one. It's an open threat that we will continue to pursue all available avenues to ensure the terrorist leaders who are involved in heinous crimes against our citizens are brought to justice.

We will continue with the surgical strikes. Ghar mei ghus ke marenge.

Pakistan should be scared now, very scared.

Time has again come to call for a boycott of Chinese goods.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,868
Country flag
When did India purchase S300?

post the link here.
Not all purchases are publicised. None knew that we had Mig-25s till its retirement. It is unlikely that India did not have S-300 given that its primary AD system were based on Russian SAMs before Baraks and Akash came into being. S-300 was the best system in their time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top