Bhai i will gift u single malt.Hearing a spectacular rumor that the US is going to publicly confirm F-16 downing and its own remote-sensing observations on Balakot in retaliation to UNSC drama.
When the name shahzaz ud din s/s air marshal and pics of group captain agha meher floated on social media, pakis debunked it within 24 hrs.Does that mean we caught the paki pilot ..
We need a counterbalance to china. US is the only one.It's USA... A nation almost similar to China when it comes to the trust part.
We bought INS Jalashwa (an Austin-class LPD) with our own money, too. Guess what? It doesn't mean squat!They bought F16-C/D using their own money. Entire F16 fleet of PAF were bought by pakis using their own money.
So this violation of terms of contract notion is farce
Who said it on BRF?............ they are the ones who claimed it was this guy in the first placeWhen the name shahzaz ud din s/s air marshal and pics of group captain agha meher floated on social media, pakis debunked it within 24 hrs.
Now about this new character hyder shahbaz ali, they are yet to prove that he is alive
on twitter one guy stated that he getting training in south korea, now i read on BRF that he is in maxwell air base US.
Don't think the Falcon ever had a chance, they would be allowed to bid but they would have been rejected, the sole US fighters who stand a chance in India are F-18 Block 3 or F-35 if offered.F 16 Blk 70 aka 'F 21' is history now. LOL! Lockheed just got #metoo'ed!
Well best in Asia is a big stretch Japan already takes delivery of the F-35. While Rafale has some nice tricks that other don't have, other like the F-35 have more tricks that Rafale doesn't have.As I’m sure @BON PLAN will tell you, this “5th gen” term is just a marketing term invnted by LM.
The Rafale is utterly unmatched in many of its capabilities and will be THE most capable fighter in Asia for a few decades once it lands in India later this year.
It has tech in it not even the F22 or F35 can claim to have and is decades ahead of the junk the Chinese market as “next generation”
A user named Mort Walker on Mig 21 threadWho said it on BRF?............ they are the ones who claimed it was this guy in the first place
The only "confirmation" is some random Napaki posting on F16.net.Some reports saying that haider shahbaz ali is also in US, that means no confirmation is coming about this pilot from paki side ........
Let’s wait to see what happens. If anybody from 19 sherdil squadron went down, it has to be him. Nobody else fits the scriptA user named Mort Walker on Mig 21 thread
"Some reports indicate Haider Shahbaz Ali is in training at Maxwell AFB, AL in the US."
I have read some serious rubbish posted on these fora, but this ladies and gentlemen, takes the cake.Why cant we lease a island in andaman to USA?
Nothing like that. Pakis r free to use f16s against anyone without hurting US interests .We bought INS Jalashwa (an Austin-class LPD) with our own money, too. Guess what? It doesn't mean squat!
Pakistan requires US Congress approval just to use these planes that they've paid for in full.
When a sentence starts with "Some reports" or "According to sources" . Its best to immediately throw the rest of the sentence in the dustbin.Let’s wait to see what happens. If anybody from 19 sherdil squadron went down, it has to be him. Nobody else fits the script
Please, Rafale won't prevent desperate Pukis from countering an attack or attacking, they would rather get pummeled and raise the white flag in a jiffy than not fight. You should know better by now.curse the idiots in the congress that we don't have rafales right now. pakis wouldn't even dare come 20 km close to LoC if those birds were in service.
India Today, Not going to Link there
Outraged over China blocking for the fourth time a move to designate JeM chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist, the United States has warned that they "may be forced to pursue other actions" at the Security Council if Beijing continued with this policy.
"If China is serious about these goals, it should not protect terrorists from Pakistan or any other country from being held accountable to the Council. If China continues to block this designation, responsible member states may be forced to pursue other actions at the Security Council. It shouldn't have to come to that," a US diplomat said.
The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity to give a sense of the feeling of other members of the Security Council after China blocked the move to designate Azhar a global terrorist. This is the fourth time that China has placed a hold on this listing.
"This is the fourth time that China has placed a hold on this listing. China should not prevent the Committee from doing the job the Security Council has entrusted it to do," another security council diplomat told PTI.
Claiming that China has been inconsistent with combating terror, the US diplomat said, "Pakistan has often depended on China to protect it from the listing of Pakistan-based terrorist groups and individuals in the UN 1267 sanctions committee."
A US diplomat in the United Nations Security Council said, "The case for designating Masood Azhar, the leader of a group the UN already calls an al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist organisation, is undeniable. China should not prevent the committee from doing the job the Security Council has entrusted it to do."
Saying China may face action from UNSC member states, the American diplomat said, "China's move to hold the listing is inconsistent with its own stated goals of combating terrorism and furthering regional stability in South Asia."