India Strikes Against Pakistani Terrorism 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

vampyrbladez

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,283
Likes
26,674
Country flag
The LEMOA agreement that we have signed is as good as giving them All bases
In India , as and when they need

We have also started using US bases in East Asia and Oman

They dont need a permanent base in Andaman
Bullshit. It's a quid pro quo. We access their bases for replenishment and maintenance and they ours. We hold 100% control on our ports as they do on theirs.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
US gave pakis AIM-120C5 to target Indian jets only. Thats what pakis did. How it will violate Terms of sale?
India didn't do a mil. Conflict .
Indias action was against non mil asset inside pak.

Pakistan used the missile to provoke war not in the act of defence against india .
Well...could be that line that violated the terms
 

Shiv sagar

New Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
235
Likes
1,052
Country flag
They are trying to sell upgraded version of F-16 to India. Also, they already know pakistan violated terms of contract when we presented evidence of AIM-120 C missile.
Well with that AIM-120C, down went any hopes of LM to sell their f21 to Us. We are happy to have more French toast rather than burgers.
 

Kazah

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
929
Likes
3,495
Hearing a spectacular rumor that the US is going to publicly confirm F-16 downing and its own remote-sensing observations on Balakot in retaliation to UNSC drama.
Some reports saying that haider shahbaz ali is also in US, that means no confirmation is coming about this pilot from paki side ........
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
Some reports saying that haider shahbaz ali is also in US, that means no confirmation is coming about this pilot from paki side ........
Does that mean we caught the paki pilot ..
 

captscooby81

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Messages
7,371
Likes
27,668
Country flag
There is no such terms which bound the pakis not to use their F-16A/B against India . Not sure where did this come from. May be there was clause for the F-16C/D which were sold after 2008 for War on terror assistance which might be having some clause on usage .Still why will American supply AIM-120 to Pakis when taliban don't even own DJI type drones in 2010 to fight war on terror ...
 

Defenceanalyst91

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2018
Messages
821
Likes
887
India didn't do a mil. Conflict .
Indias action was against non mil asset inside pak.

Pakistan used the missile to provoke war not in the act of defence against india .
Well...could be that line that violated the terms
This is our version. Pskis wil simply say they used this against Indian aggression.

Another thing is, we dont know the terms of contract. We also buy lot of weapons from US. I don't thing we will buy US weapons if it cant used for offensive operations. Same is for Pakis.
 

Defenceanalyst91

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2018
Messages
821
Likes
887
There is no such terms which bound the pakis not to use their F-16A/B against India . Not sure where did this come from. May be there was clause for the F-16C/D which were sold after 2008 for War on terror assistance which might be having some clause on usage .Still why will American supply AIM-120 to Pakis when taliban don't even own DJI type drones in 2010 to fight war on terror ...
They bought F16-C/D using their own money. Entire F16 fleet of PAF were bought by pakis using their own money.
So this violation of terms of contract notion is farce
 

patriots

Defense lover
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
5,706
Likes
21,816
Country flag
The problm with india....is......
We are unable to get armaments.... Jets ...helicopters....due to political situation......but Pakistan is getting full and low cost support from china....
They are getting fighters...drone s air defense systems........missile s.......
......everything..............
Though I believe in quality......
But quantity is a threat too
 

AmoghaVarsha

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
1,375
Likes
2,094
Country flag
because india is not pakistan

we dont want to be a vassal state to bigger nations for security (like pakistan does like a prostitute-first USA then China) but we want to be super power one day in the future...
Iran leased the Chabahar port to India. They are not our vassal.

We lease island to US near straits if Malacca we will play US againist China. That will free us to do our own stuff.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
Iran leased the Chabahar port to India. They are not our vassal.

We lease island to US near straits if Malacca we will play US againist China. That will free us to do our own stuff.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It's USA... A nation almost similar to China when it comes to the trust part.
 

AmoghaVarsha

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
1,375
Likes
2,094
Country flag
Recently we have had 3 Clear Successes
Against China ,in International matters
1 Maldives
2 Sri Lanka airport
3 Cam Rahn Bay Base in Vietnam

So by vetoeing this , is China not showing
Its insecurity
In Maldives people were fed up plus US warned of sanctions.

In SL, China has successfully blocked our trincomalee project that PM Wickramasinghe was pushing. Infact they turned a previous Indian ally into a chinese onr.

Vietnamese dont like china


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top