- Joined
- Aug 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,419
- Likes
- 2,819
.... Actually its not so confusing if you start reading between lines and try to summarize up the whole idea behind XR-SAM. It has been envisioned after repeated successful trial of AAD. It is a derivative of AAD. So currently AAD does have a range of 120 km, so doubling up the range is the idea behind XR-SAM. So we could assume that it would be on par with S-300.
S-400 main features are not range and KP only.
XR-SAM will not be so mobile and stealthy and will not have an equal network centric capabilities ever...
Отправлено с моего XT1080 через Tapatalk
I am a fanboy when it comes to indigenous defence products so I'll keep my fingers crossed for an XR-SAM that is in the S-400 class. Maybe it'll be as @IndianHawk said in #714 , we'll slowly evolve XR-SAM to greater ranges and maybe it will evolve into a system comparable to S-500 in the future. Optimism is all I have.Once India 's inducts S-400 and S-500 the whole Pakistani airforce will be paralyzed within
250-500 km of their airspace.
About the network-centricity though, I think IACCS is already online no? And its going to recieve a boost once GSAT-7A is launched sometime next year. All IACCS nodes are expected to be in place by 2020. And there were plans to move to completely dynamic targeting by 2025. So why would XR-SAM not have netowork capabilities equal to S-400?