I have some spare time, let's debate, hope you will reply in sense.
Abhramic religions promote hive mentality. The cultural structure of such a society wraps around a central authority or a building, Imams & Mosque for Islam, Padre & Church for Christianism.
Oftentimes in history, it has been demonstrated that the public
does follow a single religious leader. For example, Pope & Church was the supreme authority in Roman times. We see such an example in Islam as well where locals reject laws of the country in favour of "Sharia" zones.
Just to point out, Hinduism, due to its naturally sparse and diverse nature of belief, is not centered around a single authority, or even a deity.
Interesting how you put RSS here, as if RSS went to crusades, forcefully converting minorities using violence and death (which is rather a common phenomenon for abhramic religions, even today).
Savarkar, Yogi Adityanath, few nutjob BJP leaders, and other self-styled gurus, yes we have cases or calls of promoting Hinduism. But notice the word,
calls. Nothing as such has ever been implemented, even gathered any widespread support.
The reason is simple, the mind of Hindu is made to question logic and promote individual freedom, and it abhors force or violence to promote religion.
Here, you may give an example of some "ghar wapsi", but they are exactly that.
Ghar wapsi. Poor people converted under rice or sword, given the choice to return back to their original religion.
Tell me some skeletons of enemies/non-believers in the Hindu religion?
No, Islamic extremists were always active. The last 100 years were just more documented.
Ask my Sikh brothers.
Hilarious claim. Muslims fight among themselves (Shia/Sunni/Ahmedi/Sufi etc.) when they have nothing to fight. Violence is deep-rooted in Islam.
The first response of any Muslim to any slight discomfort is picking up arms.
- You do not agree to my imaginary sky-friend - Beheaded
- Women are roaming without a male partner - Rape them
- You retaliate - They form terror organizations and blow your cities
Where a natural response is just saying "whatever", and moving on, Muslims are picking up swords.
The only tinge of prosperity any Muslim nation has achieved is either giving up religion or following a watered-down version (Russia/Turkey), or by luck (oil money).
It's natural any enemy nation will take advantage of such nutjobs.
To be continued....