Ninda karo toh mazaak udate hain, na karo toh kadi ninda karte hain.
Indian Army loves Counter terrorism.. Low risk way to get a high from some action in your own territory, where you dominate every aspect from manpower, firepower to surveillance.. Who doesnt love cheap thrills
Frankly I haven't followed the issue in any great detail except to read multiple reports about it then & a year or two after the incident . It's 4.5 yrs now & there's no point trying to get into it since in the absence of any direct evidence , it's one man's word vs the other other man's word & consequently one man's belief vs the other man's belief.Sorry to bring up an old topic. I came across an article by the "The Drive" where there was a refutation given by the Authors on India's claim of shooting down an F-16. The article's Authors are Joseph Trevithick And Tyler Rogoway. In the article, they make a mention about the radar images which the Indian Airforce had released to validate the F-16 kill.
So they said this.
"Without having more data and context, we have no way of knowing conclusively that the contact disappeared and never reappeared or that it was an F-16, to begin with. Electronic warfare and the limitations of the airborne early warning and control system could have been factors, as well. The mountainous terrain and other ground clutter may have masked the Viper's radar signatures temporarily and the fighter could have dropped into the "doppler notch" of the airborne radar system."
View attachment 222665
So what do fellow members have to say about this "Doppler notching" drama? A lot of Pakistanis, and even westerners are using this to counter the radar images which were made public by the Indian Airforce.
That day, on 27th February 2019 when Swift Retard happened, we had several eyes in the skies. For e.g the Su-30MKI with its Bars PESA radar, the PHALCON AWACS. I think the PHALCON AWACS's radar is AESA.
A member here @cyclops said that Modern AESA radars are immune to Doppler notching. @mist_consecutive said the same and added that AESA radars and the PESA radar of Su-30 MKI is immune to Doppler notching. Further clarification would be appreciated.
@RoaringTigerHiddenDragon @Azaad and everyone else.
No more FShola controversy please..Sorry to bring up an old topic. I came across an article by the "The Drive" where there was a refutation given by the Authors on India's claim of shooting down an F-16. The article's Authors are Joseph Trevithick And Tyler Rogoway. In the article, they make a mention about the radar images which the Indian Airforce had released to validate the F-16 kill.
So they said this.
"Without having more data and context, we have no way of knowing conclusively that the contact disappeared and never reappeared or that it was an F-16, to begin with. Electronic warfare and the limitations of the airborne early warning and control system could have been factors, as well. The mountainous terrain and other ground clutter may have masked the Viper's radar signatures temporarily and the fighter could have dropped into the "doppler notch" of the airborne radar system."
View attachment 222665
So what do fellow members have to say about this "Doppler notching" drama? A lot of Pakistanis, and even westerners are using this to counter the radar images which were made public by the Indian Airforce.
That day, on 27th February 2019 when Swift Retard happened, we had several eyes in the skies. For e.g the Su-30MKI with its Bars PESA radar, the PHALCON AWACS. I think the PHALCON AWACS's radar is AESA.
A member here @cyclops said that Modern AESA radars are immune to Doppler notching. @mist_consecutive said the same and added that AESA radars and the PESA radar of Su-30 MKI is immune to Doppler notching. Further clarification would be appreciated.
@RoaringTigerHiddenDragon @Azaad and everyone else.
These potshots are legit.
You would know...
No Paki citizens read terrorists waging war against India on Indian soil have been killed in various Kashmir encounters.
After you.
Your jerk off fantasies are of no interest to me.
Most already know me, they should pay attention to the TRF terrorist media cell guy who spends his time masquerading as someone else.
sure.TRF media guy hard at work.....
Like I give a flying f what a terrorist supporter thinks....
I can do this all the time..
You are not going to be much use to anyone if you can't do your work of promoting the TRF. Your problem was that you thought if you were sneaky, nobody would notice your TRF media promotion work. Fat chance of that now. You can expect to be called out almost every time going forward. I have nothing to lose, your pathetic attempts at abusing are laughable. I simply don't care for your opinion on my person. I'm going to disrupt your work every chance I get.
1. Abhinandan was debriefed after his return,awarded for downing a 4tg gen JetSorry to bring up an old topic. I came across an article by the "The Drive" where there was a refutation given by the Authors on India's claim of shooting down an F-16. The article's Authors are Joseph Trevithick And Tyler Rogoway. In the article, they make a mention about the radar images which the Indian Airforce had released to validate the F-16 kill.
So they said this.
"Without having more data and context, we have no way of knowing conclusively that the contact disappeared and never reappeared or that it was an F-16, to begin with. Electronic warfare and the limitations of the airborne early warning and control system could have been factors, as well. The mountainous terrain and other ground clutter may have masked the Viper's radar signatures temporarily and the fighter could have dropped into the "doppler notch" of the airborne radar system."
View attachment 222665
So what do fellow members have to say about this "Doppler notching" drama? A lot of Pakistanis, and even westerners are using this to counter the radar images which were made public by the Indian Airforce.
That day, on 27th February 2019 when Swift Retard happened, we had several eyes in the skies. For e.g the Su-30MKI with its Bars PESA radar, the PHALCON AWACS. I think the PHALCON AWACS's radar is AESA.
A member here @cyclops said that Modern AESA radars are immune to Doppler notching. @mist_consecutive said the same and added that AESA radars and the PESA radar of Su-30 MKI is immune to Doppler notching. Further clarification would be appreciated.
@RoaringTigerHiddenDragon @Azaad and everyone else.
