Pretty strong words you are using and you are certainly being judgmental and on a high horse. How is it that I am being childish and incompetent when you got plenty of examples of capturing Pakistan raiders and letting them go and seeing them back in action again. This is what happened to the other guy.
This argument neither suffices nor is relevant to the rant you made in response to my post where it was about financial situation of an individual.
How did the peace process begin? With acts of mercy.
No, it doesn't. Just as armed forces saving his life won't make them pro Pakistan, taking pity on a poor individual won't make me a terrorist sympathiser. It's basic reasoning and reason why at first place I called you incompetent.
You are still violating debate pyramid and just strawman arguments far away from relevance.
Who said about mass killing of anyone? All I said was the minute they turn to perpetuating acts of terrorism is the minute we need to stop feeling sorry for them.
Even poor and hungry, they still retain the capacity for exercising rational thought and action and based on that, they shouldn't go on paths of violence. Once they do that, they have lost their capacity for rational thought and have become rabid.
Picking every individual with same measure of terroristic perception kills innocents along.
Just be a bit empathic, think if you are born in a theocratic hellhole, your family is either starving or has been abducted, an individual man who is already traumatized won't be able think for right or wrong in that way. He would have lost everything and his family would be everything he has and he will do anything for them.
Whether that captured person is saying is true or false about his financial situation is debatable. But if you don't feel sorry for any such person, there is something seriously wrong with your mind.
That is your personal opinion. There are others who have praised KPS Gill and said that he prevented another Kashmir in Punjab.
Even right wing nationalist circles of Punjab hate him to the core.
Punjab had quite much of a nationalist majority over khalitani factions.
It's Gill's catch and encounter on doubt policy which took away lives of many innocents turned a chunk of families against Indian state.
If you have ever lived in Punjab or northern areas of Haryana where Punjabis are majority, you would hear stories from your parents and grandparents about that era. It's Congress' stupid policy and police brutality which brought khalistan to mainstream from a faction.
They remained lenient on Islamic terrorism in Kashmir but went full hard on people with random picking in a Sikh-Hindu majority state.
Her actions were a course requirement of forces which brought her to power than her leniency.
It indeed helps to go hard, but not retard what she and her successors went. Many of her unilateral and "strong" decisions are still being payed by the nation. Guess even Nehru didn't screw India's future, she did.
Really?? have you not been paying attention to the ongoing killings and atrocities going on in Pakistan? Every day we get reports of Hindus getting killed, raped, mutilated, etc. whatever evil action these Pakistanis have heaped upon them. That disprove your assertion right there.
Which way lol? Talk in data? There are 200 million Muslims in Pakistan and Hindus are largely concentrated in Sindh. They have hire occurrence of violence because of violent nature of Deobandi Islam.
Still it doesn't cover 100% of their population which is more interested in getting their bread and butter than killing their neighbors. Even in radical to more radical societies, only obsessed assholes take such actions.
Every rational person wants to accumulate wealth whether it be material or spiritual but that doesn't mean all of them wont put their nation first.
Human history tells us: no, they won't put their nation first. They at best can go with signaling with donating some money. Only hundred in one will have guts to sacrifice his life and even he will expect to have well being of his family taken care off.
If you actually believe what you just wrote, you just proved my point about naivety. Because if it wasn't the case, Chinese people wouldn't be screaming about Taiwan or Pakistani people still protesting about Kashmir all the bloody time even when their economy is tanking.
If you believe that putting nation first =
random protests, diplomatic statements, social media noises & event organisation
and not a full and effective give up and boycott of foreign goods, advantages, assistance and relations,
you are too confused and childish to be helped with. Even a 10 years old can express signals and do protests, it doesn't add any value to issue. Same as social media buzz. Noise with zero value in real world.
