Idiotic Musings From Firangistan

[fooLIam]

Those N's in the back lmao

Bollywood’s and khan trio were normalising the “ladkiya chedna”(stalking and harassing girls) in the name of romance along with chapri culture etc.

 

[Azaad]

 

[Azaad]

For those who don't know Tom Wolfe -

Tom Wolfe - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Azaad]

 

[Azaad]

This is what the Persians have always thought about the Indians ( Paxtan + Kangladesh & rest of the Indian sub continent included. )

 

[Azaad]

 

[vin bharat mahan]

lol..these gora jokers. adopting someones some life style doesnt mean, they distroyed their civilization. u can say ancent civilization is upgrading or absorbing these western ideology/lifestyle. just like western people adopting many life style from indian hindu civilization (yoga, believing in karma nd rebirth, hindu festivals (holi etc) nd also many other civilization. nd its due to easier mediums (like internet etc) to communicate with each others.

 

[Butter Chicken]

 

[vin bharat mahan]

inse jyada effective to humare "halwai" police wale hote hai.

 

[prasadr14]

inse jyada effective to humare "halwai" police wale hote hai.

View attachment 230000

There are numerous professions that are NOT meant for women.
Some women do shine in them but they are exceptions.

Being in police or infantry should only be based on merit and nothing else, irrespective of gender.
Those 4 women cops clearly did not get the job on merit.

For all those women who say 'who need men', if men stopped for a week, these same women would be covered in shit and begging someone to do something.

men do the toughest and dirtiest jobs that basically runs the world.
In some of the professions, women participation is near zero.

equality is a joke, on women.

 

[Blademaster]

There are numerous professions that are NOT meant for women.
Some women do shine in them but they are exceptions.

Being in police or infantry should only be based on merit and nothing else, irrespective of gender.
Those 4 women cops clearly did not get the job on merit.

For all those women who say 'who need men', if men stopped for a week, these same women would be covered in shit and begging someone to do something.

men do the toughest and dirtiest jobs that basically runs the world.
In some of the professions, women participation is near zero.

equality is a joke, on women.

They been watching too much Hollywood movies where they show females kicking the shit out of men even though the men are bigger faster and stronger than women.

 

[vin bharat mahan]

There are numerous professions that are NOT meant for women.
Some women do shine in them but they are exceptions.

Being in police or infantry should only be based on merit and nothing else, irrespective of gender.
Those 4 women cops clearly did not get the job on merit.

For all those women who say 'who need men', if men stopped for a week, these same women would be covered in shit and begging someone to do something.

men do the toughest and dirtiest jobs that basically runs the world.
In some of the professions, women participation is near zero.

equality is a joke, on women.

i think equality in men is also a joke... different person hv different capabilities. every person hv different merit. equality is joke in reality, but philosophy (like in our sanatan dharma) of "treating everyone equal" is good for society development. then u didnt create inferiority nd superiority in a society. which become/developed a undevided society.

 

[Indrajit]

They been watching too much Hollywood movies where they show females kicking the shit out of men even though the men are bigger faster and stronger than women.

Generalisations are pointless. Clearly a well trained woman can hold her own or beat the average or maybe less than average man. The problem is that the top 10% of women may do that with a large percentage of men but have no chance against the top 25% or so of the men, maybe more. You are right when you are speaking of averages but that's not how the real world pans out. A well trained and physically strong woman is not going to beaten by all men.

The problem is that the military is an tough place and women should be able to hold their own on the same standards applicable to men. Diluting standards doesn't help any force nor does it get the women any respect. Very few women, if any can do that.

 

[Blademaster]

Generalisations are pointless. Clearly a well trained woman can hold her own or beat the average or maybe less than average man. The problem is that the top 10% of women may do that with a large percentage of men but have no chance against the top 25% or so of the men, maybe more. You are right when you are speaking of averages but that's not how the real world pans out. A well trained and physically strong woman is not going to beaten by all men.

The problem is that the military is an tough place and women should be able to hold their own on the same standards applicable to men. Diluting standards doesn't help any force nor does it get the women any respect. Very few women, if any can do that.

The top 10% of women will not beat the average man but below the average man about the bottom 25% of men only because those men are out of shape to do anything. But once they get into shape, that number drops to like 5%.

The top 10% of women can only beat the bottom 5% of men if all men were in shape. However I still stand by my original point that if society has found a way to equalize the footing of women against men in military settings by coming up with technological & biological improvements, that society has a huge advantage over other societies because it means that that society can unlock the other half of the population and get more prospects, a bigger field of candidates that its military can choose from.

 

[prasadr14]

Generalisations are pointless. Clearly a well trained woman can hold her own or beat the average or maybe less than average man. The problem is that the top 10% of women may do that with a large percentage of men but have no chance against the top 25% or so of the men, maybe more. You are right when you are speaking of averages but that's not how the real world pans out. A well trained and physically strong woman is not going to beaten by all men.

The problem is that the military is an tough place and women should be able to hold their own on the same standards applicable to men. Diluting standards doesn't help any force nor does it get the women any respect. Very few women, if any can do that.

Unless that woman is professional or has over whelming weight advantage, a well trained woman should never ever engage a physical fight with even an average man.

Even a professional fighter usually gets taken down by an average man.
men have unfair advantage of millions of years of evolution in this.
An average man who wants to harm can be very dangerous, especially to women.

Even in that video, that man was not trying to hurt to those police women.
He just wanted to escape, that's why it took that long.
If that man wanted to harm and escape, it would have ended in 30 seconds.

 

[Azaad]

 

[Blademaster]

And this is headed up by an Indian. Go figure. She is probably one of the useless doctors who earned a MD without actually learning anything. A libtard in the making.

 

[Longewala]

Generalisations are pointless. Clearly a well trained woman can hold her own or beat the average or maybe less than average man. The problem is that the top 10% of women may do that with a large percentage of men but have no chance against the top 25% or so of the men, maybe more. You are right when you are speaking of averages but that's not how the real world pans out. A well trained and physically strong woman is not going to beaten by all men.

The problem is that the military is an tough place and women should be able to hold their own on the same standards applicable to men. Diluting standards doesn't help any force nor does it get the women any respect. Very few women, if any can do that.

Can a man who ranks in the bottom 10% of all men, in terms of fitness, muscle strength and bone density, beat some average or even somewhat below average man, just with training?

Because that's the scale of difference, except for rare freaks almost every woman ranks well, well below 90% or more men in terms of physical strength.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Generalisations are pointless. Clearly a well trained woman can hold her own or beat the average or maybe less than average man. The problem is that the top 10% of women may do that with a large percentage of men but have no chance against the top 25% or so of the men, maybe more. You are right when you are speaking of averages but that's not how the real world pans out. A well trained and physically strong woman is not going to beaten by all men.

The problem is that the military is an tough place and women should be able to hold their own on the same standards applicable to men. Diluting standards doesn't help any force nor does it get the women any respect. Very few women, if any can do that.

To be more precise, the top 1% of women athletes have no chance vs the top 33% of the athletes. Serena williams at her peak would get her ass kicked by anyone in the top 200, so would Steffi Graf.

in athletics, forget olympian to even national champs, olympian medalist women can barely hold their own vs boys high school national champs.

 

[Blademaster]