IAF MiG-21 shoots down Pakistani F-16

Status
Not open for further replies.

mayfair

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,110
So gradually Napaki lies are unravelling just like their self-professed echh&dee and the mythical martial lineage.

However, I am not expecting an official confirmation and acknowledgement of this from any Shitistani or Western source.

Too much at stake.
 

Kra

New Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
210
Likes
380
How chutiya is that abingdonboy?
IAF is at 370 knot? Means at 650 km/hr....so that means Sukhoi was flying slower than a commercial jet(800km/hr)?.....pakis and thheir Lahori logic....years of inbreeding
But that is indicated air speed? Isn't that different? I am not knowledgeable enough about these things to know actual figures and convert them.
 

abingdonboy

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
8,084
Likes
33,803
Country flag
But that is indicated air speed? Isn't that different? I am not knowledgeable enough about these things to know actual figures and convert them.
IAS is IAS, it’s what a planes fly by (TAS is computed by modern airliner flight computers and displayed separately but you can still compare IAS of a jet and airliner)
 

mayfair

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,110
The lies unravelling slowly.

A chronology of Baki lies

1. First two planes shot down, 3 pilots in custody, 2 of them in hospital. No F-16s.

2. Second, two planes shot down, 3 pilots in custody, one died, one Israeli. F-16s were used.

3. Then two jets shot down, one pilot in custody, second plane fell in Indian territory. Israeli pilot forgotten, so was the doosra banda.

4. No Indian missiles were fired.

5. Indians fired missiles and missed.

6. Roll of honour, only one pilot who downed Abhinandan was given the sitwara-e-whatever.

7. As an afterthought, add another sitara-e-whatever to the pilot who supposedly shot down Su-30.

8. The jet changed from F-16B (2 seater) to F-16A (single seater)

9. Dimmy let sit slip that Balakot was big.

10. Dimmy lets it slip that PAF shot down an plane (Oxford graduate cannot even get the grammar right), that is, the second shootdown claims were bogus.

Conclusion- Dimmy's a RAA agint.
 
Last edited:

Neptune

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,188
Likes
6,171
Country flag
The lies unravelling slowly.

A chronology of Baki lies

1. First two planes shot down, 3 pilots in custody, 2 of them in hospital. No F-16s.

2. Second, two planes shot down, 3 pilots in custody, one died, one Israeli. F-16s were used.

3. Then two jets shot down, one pilot in custody, second plane fell in Indian territory. Israeli pilot forgotten, so was the doosra banda.

4. No Indian missiles were fired.

5. Indians fired missiles and missed.

6. Roll of honour, only one pilot who downed Abhinandan was given the sitwara-e-whatever.

7. As an afterthought, add another sitara-e-whatever to the pilot who supposedly shot down Su-30.

8. The jet changed from F-16B (2 seater) to F-16A (single seater)

9. Dimmy let sit slip that Balakot was big.

10. Dimmy lets it slip that PAF shot down an plane (Oxford graduate cannot even get the grammar right), that is, the second shootdown claims were bogus.

Conclusion- Dimmy's a RAA agint.


The Pakistani military and the people who truly believed their claims suffer from severe autism. You can guarantee that if the US bombed Pakistan into the Stone Age, the Pakistani military would claim they shot down 10 F-22s, no make that 30. Then they would claim they shot down a few B-2 bombers and a squadron of F-35s, and maybe a few Israelis aircraft as well since it’s standard procedure to make that claim going back to the Israeli Arab wars.
Pakistan can not verify most its kills because they are liars, going back to their supposed downing of Israeli aircraft in the Arab Israel conflict to their fairy tales about some random pilot shooting down 5 Indian aircraft in a few seconds.

As much boasting as Pakistanis do they sure can’t ever bring hard proof such as HUD footage which is ironic since they go to extreme measures to convince the world of these shoot downs. such as awarding fake medals, fake kills, holding ceremonies, doing photo shoots of the supposed ‘hero’s’, holding press conferences, creating plaques, patches and teaching/indoctrinating Pakistans includes their pilots about fictional events that literally never took place but of course ask for HUD footage or wreckage, crash location, etc and they have less then nothing.


The brain dead Pakistanis on PDF such as Windjammer and The Eagle make embarrassing claims such as some mysterious SU-30 pilots died in a car crash and that there is SU-30 wreckage that fell in Pakistan...they just can’t show it. Of course.


To some things up no Pakistani can provide the following or give any explanation of the following.


1. Why has Pakistan not provided radar data?

2. Why has Pakistan not provided HUD footage?

3. Why has Pakistan not provided satellite images of the wreckage?

4. Why has no third party seen or provided satellite imagery of the SU-30 crash site?

5. Why is there no radio intercepts?

6. Why is there no video footage or pictures of the SU-30 going down?

7. Why is there no video footage or pictures of the aircraft debris?

8. Why is there no video footage or pictures of pilots descending?

9 Why is there no video footage or pictures of SU-30 pilots on the ground, dead or alive?

10. Why is there no video footage or pictures of pilots being transported to a hospital?

11. Why is there no video footage or photos of the explosion after the SU-30 crashed? The fireball from the SU-30 would probably reach 300-400 feet, yet no one witnessed anything?


But hey Bagdad Bob said Pakistan shot down a few Indian aircraft. Retarded Pakistan pilots are on social media jumping around like unprofessional retards and doing propaganda photo shoots with fake kill patch so it must be true :pound:
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,378
The Pakistani military and the people who truly believed their claims suffer from severe autism. You can guarantee that if the US bombed Pakistan into the Stone Age, the Pakistani military would claim they shot down 10 F-22s, no make that 30. Then they would claim they shot down a few B-2 bombers and a squadron of F-35s, and maybe a few Israelis aircraft as well since it’s standard procedure to make that claim going back to the Israeli Arab wars.
Pakistan can not verify most its kills because they are liars, going back to their supposed downing of Israeli aircraft in the Arab Israel conflict to their fairy tales about some random pilot shooting down 5 Indian aircraft in a few seconds.

As much boasting as Pakistanis do they sure can’t ever bring hard proof such as HUD footage which is ironic since they go to extreme measures to convince the world of these shoot downs. such as awarding fake medals, fake kills, holding ceremonies, doing photo shoots of the supposed ‘hero’s’, holding press conferences, creating plaques, patches and teaching/indoctrinating Pakistans includes their pilots about fictional events that literally never took place but of course ask for HUD footage or wreckage, crash location, etc and they have less then nothing.


The brain dead Pakistanis on PDF such as Windjammer and The Eagle make embarrassing claims such as some mysterious SU-30 pilots died in a car crash and that there is SU-30 wreckage that fell in Pakistan...they just can’t show it. Of course.


To some things up no Pakistani can provide the following or give any explanation of the following.


1. Why has Pakistan not provided radar data?

2. Why has Pakistan not provided HUD footage?

3. Why has Pakistan not provided satellite images of the wreckage?

4. Why has no third party seen or provided satellite imagery of the SU-30 crash site?

5. Why is there no radio intercepts?

6. Why is there no video footage or pictures of the SU-30 going down?

7. Why is there no video footage or pictures of the aircraft debris?

8. Why is there no video footage or pictures of pilots descending?

9 Why is there no video footage or pictures of SU-30 pilots on the ground, dead or alive?

10. Why is there no video footage or pictures of pilots being transported to a hospital?

11. Why is there no video footage or photos of the explosion after the SU-30 crashed? The fireball from the SU-30 would probably reach 300-400 feet, yet no one witnessed anything?


But hey Bagdad Bob said Pakistan shot down a few Indian aircraft. Retarded Pakistan pilots are on social media jumping around like unprofessional retards and doing propaganda photo shoots with fake kill patch so it must be true :pound:
They have twitter and that is enough.
 

mayfair

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,110
This is no longer about Su-30, even Napakis don't believe that crap anymore.

They are all about making sure that no details of F-16 shoot down become public ever. Su-30 shoot down claims are just an attempt to do a equal-equal plus one- "Look we shot down one plane of yours that is confirmed. We claim that we have shot down another, you claim that you shot down one of ours. There's no "proof" of either (OSINT, radar imagery and other analyses by Indian experts notwithstanding), so are claims are equal-equal only"

They wish to bracket their false claim with our true claim to diminish the credibility of IAF and GoI.

The first and second set of lies have unravelled, the final pack of lies will unravel soon enough.
 

Absolut_Vodka

Quarantined Abdul
Banned
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
1,413
Likes
7,073
Country flag


Was going through the article again and another circumstantial but physical evidence that Mig21 indeed fired missile.

Geolocations of video observers already established in the article. So Paki should fire missiles only eastwards towards loc but a missile streak is showing northwards. Why would a missile be fired northwards by Paki, parallel to loc?

Abhinandan was running back towards India when AMRAAM hit him from behind and he fell close to LoC. And even if F-16 fired missile northwards towards Abhi, why its contrails extend beyond crash site?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top