ashdoc
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 2,980
- Likes
- 3,682
Yeah the news ought to be false .Don’t trouble NDTV on rational scientific questions, their boss Prannoy Roy just said centrifugal force attracts votes to the centre..
Yeah the news ought to be false .Don’t trouble NDTV on rational scientific questions, their boss Prannoy Roy just said centrifugal force attracts votes to the centre..
Upgrading for better range BVR so we have the complete overwhelming advantage against the enemy and not just advantage by a small margin or balanced. In case of this encounter if Sukhois had a longer range BVR then they could have stayed outside the max range of the enemy BVR and engaged if required by not being engaged themselves.Then why is the r77 missile being replaced by Israeli missiles ? The only way you could be correct is the news of replacement being false .
This will convince me only if news of entire 272 sukhois r 77 missiles being replaced by Israeli missiles is false . Because replacing missiles of 272 sukhois is a mammoth task .How many time it has to be told that ingressing party is always at the advantage than the one that intercepts.
Also, they have a numerical advantage. They fire first. Soon they fired first we became the victims; defenders. This is a typical air war lexicon.
Porkis ran away before available Air to Air missiles could lock on.
It was Abinandhan with his supersonic Mig-21 who responded and engaged first, out chased them and locked on WVR missile and killed F-16.
The situational awareness about the ground attack would have been not that clear, except BVRs homing at us.
The kind of package CAP carries is another detail that must be considered also the peacetime rules of engagement were abided by therefore they were not chased.
Remember the strikes before that in Balakot were declared pre-emptive non-military strikes.
India procures weapons in millions every year. The weapon package of long-range BVR's that comes with Rafale would have been already operational but we all know NDTV's political masters delayed it.exactly after the Pulwama aftermath ? No , something is not right .
R77 is old missile now with range 80+km . Pak has amraam d version with range 100km. Which are much recent in development.This will convince me only if news of entire 272 sukhois r 77 missiles being replaced by Israeli missiles is false . Because replacing missiles of 272 sukhois is a mammoth task .
Replacement of missiles of 272 sukhois is too big . Bigger than procuring missiles for 36 Rafales .India procures weapons in millions every year. The weapon package of long-range BVR's that comes with Rafale would have been already operational but we all know NDTV's political masters delayed it.
This particular procurement could well be a gap filler before Rafale is inducted and all its envelops are opened, which will take a quite long time.
Yes, this is another reason to reject what NDTV is implying and trying to connect it with air skirmish with Pakistan.This will convince me only if news of entire 272 sukhois r 77 missiles being replaced by Israeli missiles is false . Because replacing missiles of 272 sukhois is a mammoth task .
So the congressi folks did nothing for defence while pakis got latest AMRAAMs .R77 is old missile now with range 80+km . Pak has amraam d version with range 100km. Which are much recent in development.
So in a limited battle where iaf has to face these 17 block 52 iaf is at range disadvantages.
In a wider battle Pakistan can't put up with numbers and looses advantage of few fighter with better missiles.
Even Russia has later versions of r77 than IAF.
So missile upgrade for su30 is long due .
Sent from my C103 using Tapatalk
SU30MKI did not fire their BVRAAMs not because of lack of range but because they did not want to switch on the radar channels associated with guiding the BVRAAMs ( untill onboard seeker goes active in LOAL mode and LOBL mode was out of question ) as the SU30MKIs were not in a position to get a actionable firing solution in the first place throughout the combat due to restrictive RoE and the need to dodge the AMRAAMs in the first place.How many time it has to be told that ingressing party is always at the advantage than the one that intercepts.
Also, they have a numerical advantage. They fire first. Soon they fired first we became the victims; defenders. This is a typical air war lexicon.
Porkis ran away before available Air to Air missiles could lock on.
It was Abinandhan with his supersonic Mig-21 who responded and engaged first, out chased them and locked on WVR missile and killed F-16.
The situational awareness about the ground attack would have been not that clear, except BVRs homing at us.
The kind of package CAP carries is another detail that must be considered also the peacetime rules of engagement were abided by therefore they were not chased.
Remember the strikes before that in Balakot were declared pre-emptive non-military strikes.
Exactly. Probably this is why Modi immediately ordered 36 flyaway rafale to negate paki advantage.So the congressi folks did nothing for defence while pakis got latest AMRAAMs .
Seriously ?R77 is old missile now with range 80+km . Pak has amraam d version with range 100km. Which are much recent in development.
So in a limited battle where iaf has to face these 17 block 52 iaf is at range disadvantages.
In a wider battle Pakistan can't put up with numbers and looses advantage of few fighter with better missiles.
Even Russia has later versions of r77 than IAF.
So missile upgrade for su30 is long due .
Sent from my C103 using Tapatalk
SU30MKI did not fire their BVRAAMs not because of lack of range but because they did not want to switch on the radar channels associated with guiding the BVRAAMs ( untill onboard seeker goes active in LOAL mode and LOBL mode was out of question ) as the SU30MKIs were not in a position to get a actionable firing solution in the first place throughout the combat due to restrictive RoE and the need to dodge the AMRAAMs in the first place.
Porkies had their Erieye AEW in the background waiting to sniff out the active guidence frequency channels of bars radar. While the F16 baited the SU30s by firing AMRAAMs in the " mad dog " mode ie firing in general direction without any target lock .
People who understand EW will appreciate the patience of IAF , incase anybody still has doubts then feel free to google " how threat library for EW are generated " .
IAF SU30MKI may have lost in terms of useless propaganda, but the pilots managed to keep their cool to keep the porkies away from getting the frequencies and make sure next time they meet surprise will still be on our
It was Obama who gave 500 AMRAAMs to Pakistan. The same forked tongue Obama Indian librandus like KC Singh and Pagalika adore.So the congressi folks did nothing for defence while pakis got latest AMRAAMs .
Yea they useless at max range that is why su30 jammed them down. That doesn't negate the fact that r77 is 90s era missile while Pak has 2010s version of amraam.Seriously ?
BVRAAMs are near useless at their maximum ranges.
What matters is not range but the optimal firing solution which will get the hostile aircraft within the NEZ ( no escape zone ) of the BVRAAM where even kinematic maneuvering by the hostile will not be sufficient enough to escape the merge.
Aircrafts are shot down by missiles when they lose the kinematic endgame via a vis the missiles. Inshort inability to outrun or outmaneuver the missile.
Ever wondered why WVRAAM missiles are better at kills than BVRAAM missiles. Because of this very reason. Shorter time to target , higher maneuverability , tighter NEZ , greater ability to sustain energy bleed etc
Well no point banging ones head I guess. Good night
The panic is pointless. Su30 has been constantly upgraded . We are adding Astra to it already . We added jammer pods previously which worked like charm and rendered paki missile useless. Adding new munition is regular program.I see a lot of panicked people here due to the NDTV article when there is no cause for worry. Let me explain:
IAF is now looking to have AAMs in three categories:
1. WVRAAM: IR guided missiles for short range engagements. ASRAAM has been selected as the standard missile for this category across fleet.
2. BVRAAM: RF guided missiles for BVR engagements. Current inventory consists of Derby, R77 and MICA. In future, Astra will replace all Derby and R77s, while MICA will continue with French aircraft
3. Long range AAM: small number of very long range missiles for 27th feb type BVR vollies and to take out high value targets such as AWACS. India will be getting METEOR missile in this category for Rafale. However for other aircraft, we will have to develop the indigenous SFDR. Since an SFDR based AAM is still a decade away, India is looking at I-Derby to be the stopgap.
This is all there is to the news. It is a welcome news since India has been hunting for such missiles for about two decades now. ( Remember the k172s novator?). NDTV is simply dishonestly linking this procurement to 27th feb events for sensationality.