- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
you think one can mount 1mt pure warhead on a missile?
Lol
this is just considered as a equilent of tnt
any member around who can calculate how much size warhead can yield UPTO 1megaton
Hypersonic Missiles
- Thread starter LETHALFORCE
- Start date
Lol
this is just considered as a equilent of tnt
any member around who can calculate how much size warhead can yield UPTO 1megaton
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
are you really that weak to understand the difference between the actuall warhead size and the yield
lol i Am from medical field though i do know this Atleast
i suspect that @yousuf know about this
lol i Am from medical field though i do know this Atleast
i suspect that @yousuf know about this
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
The link you gave for Khusub said Pakistan has the capacity to make 3 -5 kiloton YIELDING weapons annually.
The Khushab plutonium production reactor could produce 10-15 kg of plutonium annually, or enough material for 2 to 3 bombs.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
in kg not kt
check again
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
Fat Man - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
yield just 21 kt.and you know the destruction it made.we tested upto 40kt in 1998
imagine our capabilities now
yield just 21 kt.and you know the destruction it made.we tested upto 40kt in 1998
imagine our capabilities now
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
Link please Just provide a link for 10 kiloton yield from a neutral source I guarantee
you will not find anything.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
I know this is all I want is a link that Pakistan has successfully tested a 10 kiloton yield weapon from
a neutral source. No BS about mining or empty reactors Just a simple link Pakistan has a 10 kiloton yielding
nuke from a western source.
a neutral source. No BS about mining or empty reactors Just a simple link Pakistan has a 10 kiloton yielding
nuke from a western source.
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
From an unverified Wiki link you gave 5 bombs tested 40 kiloton yield total -that's 8 kiolton each. But even
this is not verified.
Number of tests 5
Test type Underground tests
Device type Fission/Fusion
Max. yield Total yield ~40 kilotons of TNT (170 TJ)
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,614
- Likes
- 6,793
Depends on isotope
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
Non wiki source. Chagai were reported as duds
Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program - 1998: The Year of Testing
US Geological Survey (USGS) defined regions that did not contain terrain of the high relief shown by Pakistan Television coverage of the shot. News coverage initially placed the location in the Chagai Hills area, some 40 km from the general area indicated by the seismic data and also lacking high relief terrain.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
Don't get your panties wet 5 tests yielding 35 kilotons (7 kilotons each)reported by Pakistan was never
confirmed US geological data.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
Read again.the First one alone had a 35kt yield.much more than the one destroyed the whole hiroshima
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
NUCLEAR ANXIETY - THE SCIENTISTS - Experts Say Pakistan Test Was Either Small or a Failure - NYTimes.com
THE SCIENTISTS; Experts Say Pakistan Test Was Either Small or a Failure
The global network that tracks earthquakes and underground atomic blasts found only a faint echo from the nuclear test that Pakistan said it conducted yesterday, American experts said.
That could mean the test was successful but small, or that the test was a failure and produced relatively few shock waves. ''It's a small event,'' said Terry C. Wallace, a seismologist at the University of Arizona who works with the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, a scientific group in Washington.
Dr. Wallace said the blast had a preliminary magnitude of 4.3, equal to about 1,000 tons of high explosive. By contrast, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had an explosive force of 15,000 tons.
The main Pakistani blast Thursday was monitored as having a magnitude of 4.8, equal to between 8,000 to 15,000 tons of high explosive. Such bombs are considered relatively small by the standards of world arsenals, where the explosive power of warheads can exceed millions of tons of high explosive.
Yesterday's test was too small to show up on the Government's main network for monitoring earthquakes around the world. ''We've searched everything we have and we don't see anything,'' said Waverly Person, a spokesman at the National Earthquake Informational Center, in Golden, Colo. ''We didn't record anything at all.''
Both groups of scientists said they would continue to examine new data as it came in, and held out the possibility that more faint signals from the Pakistani test site might be uncovered.
American experts said a statement attributed to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the architect of Pakistan's nuclear program, suggested that he might be exaggerating the country's atomic prowess. The Associated Press reported that The News, an English-language newspaper in Islamabad, quoted Dr. Qadeer Khan as saying that Pakistan's bomb program was more advanced than India's because it used uranium rather than plutonium. ''They have used the old technology of plutonium from spent fuel, whereas we have used enriched uranium, which is much more sophisticated and a safer process,'' Dr. Qadeer Khan was quoted as saying.
But experts say just the opposite is true if the aim is to put the nuclear weapon atop a missile.
THE SCIENTISTS; Experts Say Pakistan Test Was Either Small or a Failure
The global network that tracks earthquakes and underground atomic blasts found only a faint echo from the nuclear test that Pakistan said it conducted yesterday, American experts said.
That could mean the test was successful but small, or that the test was a failure and produced relatively few shock waves. ''It's a small event,'' said Terry C. Wallace, a seismologist at the University of Arizona who works with the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, a scientific group in Washington.
Dr. Wallace said the blast had a preliminary magnitude of 4.3, equal to about 1,000 tons of high explosive. By contrast, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had an explosive force of 15,000 tons.
The main Pakistani blast Thursday was monitored as having a magnitude of 4.8, equal to between 8,000 to 15,000 tons of high explosive. Such bombs are considered relatively small by the standards of world arsenals, where the explosive power of warheads can exceed millions of tons of high explosive.
Yesterday's test was too small to show up on the Government's main network for monitoring earthquakes around the world. ''We've searched everything we have and we don't see anything,'' said Waverly Person, a spokesman at the National Earthquake Informational Center, in Golden, Colo. ''We didn't record anything at all.''
Both groups of scientists said they would continue to examine new data as it came in, and held out the possibility that more faint signals from the Pakistani test site might be uncovered.
American experts said a statement attributed to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the architect of Pakistan's nuclear program, suggested that he might be exaggerating the country's atomic prowess. The Associated Press reported that The News, an English-language newspaper in Islamabad, quoted Dr. Qadeer Khan as saying that Pakistan's bomb program was more advanced than India's because it used uranium rather than plutonium. ''They have used the old technology of plutonium from spent fuel, whereas we have used enriched uranium, which is much more sophisticated and a safer process,'' Dr. Qadeer Khan was quoted as saying.
But experts say just the opposite is true if the aim is to put the nuclear weapon atop a missile.
Last edited:
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
Google translated
ÐÐ°Ñ†Ð¸Ð¾Ð½Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾Ð½Ð° / Оборонно-промышленный ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð»ÐµÐºÑ / ПÑÑ‚ÑŒ поколений ГСРПКРКонцерна �Гранит-Ðлектрон�
Five generations of the GOS PKR Concern "Granit-Electron"
Concern "Granit-Electron" started to create radar homing (GOS) in the late 50's of the last century. The first experience was gained in the development of homing missiles to P-6, designed for firing from submarines (submarine).
Shipboard equipment management system the P-6 was based on the type of remote control and solve the problem of flight control several missiles in a volley, and guidance for the purposes of RCC with radar viewfinder. Continuous operation of the radar sighting device and use it in a simple pulse sounding signal leads to some unmasking homing missiles and the vulnerability to the effects of jamming. But at the same time in that GOS was first solved the problem of combining a sector review of space radar sight with subsequent transition to maintenance mode targets for homing missiles. To do this, the GOS has been implemented the principle of monopulse tracking of targets, based on the amplitude and phase measurement of the angular deviation of each of the reflected pulse from the direction to reflective object.
In developing the GOS in the Group created a dynamic test facility (DIC), which ensured the loop simulation of the GOS and check monopulse method of target tracking in natural conditions was carried out on the aircraft-laboratory (SL). In the final stage mining GOS it entered standby mode, including automatic search, acquisition and tracking targets without operator assistance. Standby mode was less likely to combat missions, but allows the submarine after a rocket launch and enable GOS avoid possible detection by the enemy.
In parallel with working GOS ASM P-6 was carried out concern the creation of the GOS for the complex "Amethyst" - the first missile system with underwater launch cruise missile. In the CDP was implemented autonomous control system.
Under these conditions, an entirely new task was to select targets and the choice of the main objectives in the organized interference. Was found original and effective technical solution. The principle of selection is called "rope polygon": the group was selected after a review of the purposes of equidistance and most powerful purpose. This makes it very likely to choose the order in the large ships. In monopulse seeker applied the principle of target tracking. To improve noise immunity as a working was adopted more than a short-wave station centimeter than the GOS control P-6.
In the mid 60's of the last century in the Group started to develop second-generation seeker missile system P-500. This GOS developed further the principles of the GOS to PKR
P-6. In the GOS was significantly increased detection range, which allowed the prior capture and clarify the relative coordinates, to bring the CD independently, by dead reckoning coordinates in secret mode (off radiation). As a result, the CD could decline by a low altitude outside of the affected area and the ship's anti-aircraft secretly at high speed close to the attacked target. On final re-enabled radar sight and carried recapture the transition to auto tracking. This allowed the rocket, after overcoming its zone of fire enemy opposition, successfully implement self-direction up to hit.
To combat aircraft carrier compounds in the 70s of the last century was created missile "Granite". To increase its effectiveness in the onboard automatic control system (BASS) was implemented GOS third generation. GSN possible to carry out target distribution and tselenaznachenie in a volley of missiles without operator. This function is associated with a complex logic selection of targets for background noise, and with the assessment that the objectives given attributes, was implemented in the onboard digital computer (onboard computer), made for the first time on integrated circuits. Realized it algorithms based on game theory. Strategy of the organization and activities of fire burst of enemy anti-missile seen as a game of two partners. To address calculated so-called "pay-off function" selected conditions in which damage to the enemy will be maximized and their own losses ("payments") - minimal.
GOS ASM "Granite" after starting their own searches, selection and choice of object hit, and parameter estimation purposes with subsequent capture and homing to the selected target. In the electronic part of the GOS established multi-channel (active-passive) radar sighting, who works in passive mode (radio silence), provides search and discovery orders, increasing the secrecy of the GOS and the RCC in general midcourse flight. GOS ASM "Granite" has allowed to solve the problem of application of the enemy aircraft carrier connection maximum damage when its use of means of active jamming.
GSN KR "Yakhont" and GSN fifth generation with removable antenna device.
In the 80's of last century, concern began to create GOS fourth generation, to be used in a universal missile system "Onyx", having surface and submarine launched and implemented the principle of "shot - I forget." In this GSN number of new technical solutions. Use as a probe signal pulse phase-shift keyed to the restructuring of the carrier frequency of the sensing probe to a wide frequency range, the most effective in terms of anti-jamming, organically combined with the rest of the digital control system. This can significantly increase the detection range with designated antenna device dimensions and the same average power of the radiation and the simple pulse signals in the prior art. Detection range of class "cruiser" is not less than 50-70 km at extremely harsh weather conditions.
Board computer enables the processing of signals from the GOS, GOS mode control, the task of target selection in the concept, borrowed from the set of GSN "Granite", based on game theory, and issue commands to the missile control signals from the GOS with the level of enemy opposition. Regime introduced programmable height homing in the terminal phase of flight.
The export version of the GOS used in cruise missile "Yakhont" in Russian-Indian missile BRAHMOS, taken into service Indian Navy and Army.
Currently, concerns have developed GSN fifth generation, which significantly (several times) is superior in performance GOS fourth generation.
This seeker has two versions antenna device: power-driven and as a phased array (PAR). Comparative characteristics of GOS 5th generation GOS 4th generation:
- Reducing the amount of equipment in 2 times;
- Reduction of energy consumption by 2-3 times;
- Increasing range of the 2-fold;
- Increasing secrecy of 3 times;
- Expansion of the operating frequency range of 4-5;
- Increase the resolution of 8.
In GOS 5th generation sold synthetic aperture antenna selection of all types of active and passive noise, as well as protection of their impact on problem solving.
ÐÐ°Ñ†Ð¸Ð¾Ð½Ð°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾Ð½Ð° / Оборонно-промышленный ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð»ÐµÐºÑ / ПÑÑ‚ÑŒ поколений ГСРПКРКонцерна �Гранит-Ðлектрон�
Five generations of the GOS PKR Concern "Granit-Electron"
Concern "Granit-Electron" started to create radar homing (GOS) in the late 50's of the last century. The first experience was gained in the development of homing missiles to P-6, designed for firing from submarines (submarine).
Shipboard equipment management system the P-6 was based on the type of remote control and solve the problem of flight control several missiles in a volley, and guidance for the purposes of RCC with radar viewfinder. Continuous operation of the radar sighting device and use it in a simple pulse sounding signal leads to some unmasking homing missiles and the vulnerability to the effects of jamming. But at the same time in that GOS was first solved the problem of combining a sector review of space radar sight with subsequent transition to maintenance mode targets for homing missiles. To do this, the GOS has been implemented the principle of monopulse tracking of targets, based on the amplitude and phase measurement of the angular deviation of each of the reflected pulse from the direction to reflective object.
In developing the GOS in the Group created a dynamic test facility (DIC), which ensured the loop simulation of the GOS and check monopulse method of target tracking in natural conditions was carried out on the aircraft-laboratory (SL). In the final stage mining GOS it entered standby mode, including automatic search, acquisition and tracking targets without operator assistance. Standby mode was less likely to combat missions, but allows the submarine after a rocket launch and enable GOS avoid possible detection by the enemy.
In parallel with working GOS ASM P-6 was carried out concern the creation of the GOS for the complex "Amethyst" - the first missile system with underwater launch cruise missile. In the CDP was implemented autonomous control system.
Under these conditions, an entirely new task was to select targets and the choice of the main objectives in the organized interference. Was found original and effective technical solution. The principle of selection is called "rope polygon": the group was selected after a review of the purposes of equidistance and most powerful purpose. This makes it very likely to choose the order in the large ships. In monopulse seeker applied the principle of target tracking. To improve noise immunity as a working was adopted more than a short-wave station centimeter than the GOS control P-6.
In the mid 60's of the last century in the Group started to develop second-generation seeker missile system P-500. This GOS developed further the principles of the GOS to PKR
P-6. In the GOS was significantly increased detection range, which allowed the prior capture and clarify the relative coordinates, to bring the CD independently, by dead reckoning coordinates in secret mode (off radiation). As a result, the CD could decline by a low altitude outside of the affected area and the ship's anti-aircraft secretly at high speed close to the attacked target. On final re-enabled radar sight and carried recapture the transition to auto tracking. This allowed the rocket, after overcoming its zone of fire enemy opposition, successfully implement self-direction up to hit.
To combat aircraft carrier compounds in the 70s of the last century was created missile "Granite". To increase its effectiveness in the onboard automatic control system (BASS) was implemented GOS third generation. GSN possible to carry out target distribution and tselenaznachenie in a volley of missiles without operator. This function is associated with a complex logic selection of targets for background noise, and with the assessment that the objectives given attributes, was implemented in the onboard digital computer (onboard computer), made for the first time on integrated circuits. Realized it algorithms based on game theory. Strategy of the organization and activities of fire burst of enemy anti-missile seen as a game of two partners. To address calculated so-called "pay-off function" selected conditions in which damage to the enemy will be maximized and their own losses ("payments") - minimal.
GOS ASM "Granite" after starting their own searches, selection and choice of object hit, and parameter estimation purposes with subsequent capture and homing to the selected target. In the electronic part of the GOS established multi-channel (active-passive) radar sighting, who works in passive mode (radio silence), provides search and discovery orders, increasing the secrecy of the GOS and the RCC in general midcourse flight. GOS ASM "Granite" has allowed to solve the problem of application of the enemy aircraft carrier connection maximum damage when its use of means of active jamming.
GSN KR "Yakhont" and GSN fifth generation with removable antenna device.
In the 80's of last century, concern began to create GOS fourth generation, to be used in a universal missile system "Onyx", having surface and submarine launched and implemented the principle of "shot - I forget." In this GSN number of new technical solutions. Use as a probe signal pulse phase-shift keyed to the restructuring of the carrier frequency of the sensing probe to a wide frequency range, the most effective in terms of anti-jamming, organically combined with the rest of the digital control system. This can significantly increase the detection range with designated antenna device dimensions and the same average power of the radiation and the simple pulse signals in the prior art. Detection range of class "cruiser" is not less than 50-70 km at extremely harsh weather conditions.
Board computer enables the processing of signals from the GOS, GOS mode control, the task of target selection in the concept, borrowed from the set of GSN "Granite", based on game theory, and issue commands to the missile control signals from the GOS with the level of enemy opposition. Regime introduced programmable height homing in the terminal phase of flight.
The export version of the GOS used in cruise missile "Yakhont" in Russian-Indian missile BRAHMOS, taken into service Indian Navy and Army.
Currently, concerns have developed GSN fifth generation, which significantly (several times) is superior in performance GOS fourth generation.
This seeker has two versions antenna device: power-driven and as a phased array (PAR). Comparative characteristics of GOS 5th generation GOS 4th generation:
- Reducing the amount of equipment in 2 times;
- Reduction of energy consumption by 2-3 times;
- Increasing range of the 2-fold;
- Increasing secrecy of 3 times;
- Expansion of the operating frequency range of 4-5;
- Increase the resolution of 8.
In GOS 5th generation sold synthetic aperture antenna selection of all types of active and passive noise, as well as protection of their impact on problem solving.
