- Joined
- Aug 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Likes
- 497
heheheHow does a 1kt missile carry a 35kt warhead?
you dnt know or deliberately doing so?
heheheHow does a 1kt missile carry a 35kt warhead?
How does missile carry 30 time heavier warhead?? I really don't know?hehehe
you dnt know or deliberately doing so?
Equilent of TNT in kt.How does missile carry 30 time heavier warhead?? I really don't know?
Does Pakistan have anything more that 15kt ??
Can you give a link Pakistan having more than 15kt warhead?Equilent of TNT in kt.
standard all around the world
Can you give a link Pakistan having more than 15kt warhead?
Chinese CHIC designs are not more than 15kt.classified.
same question can be asked by me from about your MFN.
lol.Chinese CHIC designs are not more than 15kt.
Abdul Qadeer Khan also alleged that "KRL has built a centrifuge facility for China in Hanzhong province".[10]
BS Pakistan has no more tha a 10kt capability. Pakistan does notlol.
we established such facility even for china
as told you before we are now onto megatons warhead.
Instead of arguing with this dickhead, you would do better to simply ban him.BS Pakistan has no more tha a 10kt capability.
proof?BS Pakistan has no more tha a 10kt capability. Pakistan does not
have the platform or nuclear material for Megaton weapons. Pakistan
tech is very low yield.
But they are considered inferior.Can you give a link? Nuclear reactor created was monitored by IAEA andproof?
we manufactured first nuclear reactor 40 years before.when indians didnt knew that what nuclear reactor is.
you dnt knw our obssession with nuclear weapons
But they are considered inferior.Can you give a link? Nuclear reactor created was monitored by IAEA and
it was not 40 years ago or made for weapons. According to USA it takes Pakistan 5 years to have enough
nuclear material for a 10kt weapon.
Pakistan Atomic Research Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe PARR-II Reactor is an indigenously designed and constructed reactor owned by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission. The PARR-II Reactor's design is similar to Miniature neutron source reactor (MNSR) and SLOWPOKE reactor. The reactor was indigenously designed by the PAEC as the Atomic Energy Agency's chairman Mr. Munir Ahmad Khan and his team of engineers and scientists also led the construction of the reactor. The PARR-II Reactor had gone critical and began operating on January 21, 1974.[6] The PARR-II Reactor is a type-in-pool reactor with a rated power of 27-30 Kw. Same as the first reactor, the reactor is design to utilize the High Enrich Uranium (HEU) fuel. The HEU fuel utilize the ~90% 235U at a power level of 30 kW.[7] The demineralized light water is used as a coolant moderator and the reactor core is reflected by metallic Be4.
The two currently operating reactors have capacities variously reported at between 40 MWt to 50 MWt, and as high as 70 MWt. They are conservatively estimated to be capable of producing 22 kg of weapons grade plutonium annually.[1]
Just show me one link where Pakistan can make more than a 10kiloton weapon and I will not askPakistan Atomic Research Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
5 years for 10kt?why are you in joking mood today sir?
Pakistan's Nukes - Al-Qaeda's Next Strategic Surprise? - Defense Update News AnalysisPakistan performed its first nuclear tests in May 1998, testing a total of six nuclear warheads. Pakistan tested different types of warheads. Three were 30 – 35 kiloton (kT) yield (an effect equivalent of 30,000 -35,000 tons of standard TNT explosives); two of the warheads delivered a 12 kt yield and four was a low-yield (less than 1 kT) warhead. Analysts assume Pakistan could have developed operational 'tactical' warheads of 20 to 25 kt and 150 kilotons as well as heavy warheads with a yield of 300–500 kt. The low-yield weapons are probably designed to be carried by fighter bombers, such as Pakistan's F-16 Fighting Falcon or French Mirage 5 aircraft. Furthermore, these warheads are presumably fitted to Pakistan's short-range ballistic missiles. The higher-yield warheads are probably fitted to the Shaheen and Ghauri ballistic missiles.
i am very happy that such people also exist in our neighbour hoodI am surprised people are still arguing with this idiot. Pakistani technology is simply green paint over NoKo , chinese maal. Engineering and tech standards are a joke and the so called father of paki stolen nuke bomb thinks that water kit is a real break through...
Everyone knows pakistan has little to know technical capability, everything is borrowed from china.
No assumptions by analysts a 10 kiloton tested weapon is what i am looking for
...Pakistan performed its first nuclear tests in May 1998, testing a total of six nuclear warheads. Pakistan tested different types of warheads. Three were 30 – 35 kiloton (kT) yield (an effect equivalent of 30,000 -35,000 tons of standard TNT explosives); two of the warheads delivered a 12 kt yield and four was a low-yield (less than 1 kT) warhead. Analysts assume Pakistan could have developed operational 'tactical' warheads of 20 to 25 kt and 150 kilotons as well as heavy warheads with a yield of 300–500 kt. The low-yield weapons are probably designed to be carried by fighter bombers, such as Pakistan's F-16 Fighting Falcon or French Mirage 5 aircraft. Furthermore, these warheads are presumably fitted to Pakistan's short-range ballistic missiles. The higher-yield warheads are probably fitted to the Shaheen and Ghauri ballistic missiles.
Pakistan is not in a position to test such huge yield warheadsNo assumptions by analysts a 10 kiloton tested weapon is what i am looking for
a simple request for a nuclear power like Pakistan?
You are contradicting yourselfPakistan is not in a position to test such huge yield warheads