Future Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV)

plugwater

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
4,154
Likes
1,082
BR, I think only Mahindra, TATA and L&T have been shortlisted for the final FICV evaluation process.
 

bengalraider

DFI Technocrat
New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
3,780
Likes
2,682
Country flag
BR, I think only Mahindra, TATA and L&T have been shortlisted for the final FICV evaluation process.
Things can change pretty rapidly when money starts changing hands this is about 100,000crore never forget that!
There would be no reason of many of these companies to go all out and present their wares at DEFEXPO if something was not already in the works.
 

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
1 Lakh crore and 25000 infantry vehicles ?? Surely is a reporting error, what the hell will we do with 25000 infantry combat vehicles ! And one lakh crore rupees is to big an amount to be spent on something like an infantry fighting vehicle, hell that's almost 70% of the entire defense budget of $30 billion. But the good thing is the involvement of the private sector, that will benefit the end users, the IA, in a big way by bringing in top notch quality hardware to satisfy their needs. Good strategy, I would say.
Ha Ha Ha.... this is Coup mongering and deliberate wrong reporting.

Unless this is combined requirements for India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Vietnam, Thailand, Indinesia, African Countries, Afghanistan, CAS and Russia. Making a fighting vehicles for this market is possible and one must aim at that.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
New Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,775
Tata Motors sets aside land for Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicles (FICV) project

Tata Motors sets aside land for combat vehicles in Karnataka

Mumbai, Aug. 27:

Tata Motors has set aside 16 acres exclusively for its Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicles (FICV) project at Dharwad, Karnataka.

The combat vehicles, leveraged from the strength in design and development of a wide range of commercial vehicles, has enabled the company to cover the entire defence mobility spectrum.

The new unit is to have a capacity of 200 vehicles a year.

The company is to invest around Rs 600 crore for the development of the combat vehicles and to set up the manufacturing plant.

"Though a lot of work has already gone into developmental activities for the FICV at Pune, we are hopeful to commence project development at our Dharwad facility soon.

"We have dedicated funds for the FICV project," said a spokesperson of Tata Motors.

Revenue from the defence business was about Rs 1,000 crore in 2011-12, up 50 per cent over the last year.

Tata Motors is looking at 25-35 per cent growth in the current fiscal.

The knowledge and experience gained through the developmental projects has inspired Tata Motors to become a full-fledged Defence OEM in Land Systems with 'System and System Integration' (SOSI) capability.

"This was one of the reasons for Tata Motors to bid for the FICV project.

"We are one among four companies to have received expression of interest (EOI) to supply around 2,000 units of indigenous infantry combat vehicles," the official added.

With defence requirements on the rise in several States, especially in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, MP and Maharashtra, the need for armoured vehicles by the CRPF and other Central paramilitary forces has also precipitated.

Demand from J&K and North Eastern States has also increased.

Tata Motors is striving to serve the need through the supply of Light Armoured Troop Carriers, Light Bullet Proof Vehicles and Mine Protected Vehicles.

Tata Motors current market share in the wheeled military segment is approximately 40 per cent, and in the internal security is 75 per cent.

"We work very closely with the DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) on the potential needs of the forces," said the spokesperson.

The company is also in the exploratory stage of entering the West Asian market for its defence vehicles.
 

pmaitra

New Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,600
re: Tata Motors sets aside land for Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicles (FICV) project

KamAZ already has a manufacturing unit in Karnataka. Will Tata tie up with them?

Don't forget, Mahindra has already tied up with Ural India for making MPVIs.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
Mahindra is partnering with BAE. TATA with rheinmetall.
 

cobra commando

Tharki regiment
New Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
11,117
Likes
14,550
Country flag
Setback for private defence industry.

Setback for private defence industry. The future of the Future ICV project looks gloomy

MoD might re-tender ambitious Future Infantry Combat Vehicle project, 2 years after calling for and getting bids

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 22nd Oct 12

The private sector's much tom-tommed opening into defence production, via the Future Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV), intended to replace the army's 2,600 BMP-2s at an estimated cost of Rs 50,000 crore, faces an uncertain future. The defence ministry (MoD) is contemplating scrapping the current tender and restarting anew. This comes after sitting for two years on the FICV proposals from three private sector consortia and one public sector entity.

In early 2010, the MoD invited Tata Motors, the Mahindra Group, Larsen & Toubro and the MoD-owned Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) to submit proposals to develop an FICV, a lightly armoured vehicle that carries infantry into battle alongside tank columns. After evaluating the four proposals, the MoD was to short-list two "development partners" who would then compete to develop a prototype each. The better of the two would be selected for the army.

But the MoD's Acquisitions Wing, which must make the short list, now complains that the tender (called an Expression of Interest, or EoI) did not define the criteria by which the winners would be selected. It wants a fresh EoI to be issued, with the criteria specified.

The wing cites the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) of 2008, where Para 22 of the "Make" category, covering the FICV project, says: "The EoI should also lay down the broad parameters of the evaluation process and acceptance criterion for the system under development."

But the MoD brass realises that cancelling the EoI (drawn up in the ministry) and going back to 2010 would involve a serious loss of credibility. Besides, the "Make" category itself outlines the acceptance criteria, specifying that, "the contribution of the Indian industry in the critical technology areas should be the key criterion in assessment of various proposals."

The three private sector companies worry that restarting afresh would result in the loss of at least 18 months to two years, as the MoD prepares a new EoI and then goes through a fresh evaluation process. Meanwhile, the project teams the proposed vendors have set up for the project would continue to bleed money.

"We have already spent about Rs 28 crores on the FICV project. Now we will have to evaluate our options to see how this programme is going to roll out. It has already been delayed by two years and we foresee at least another year's delay," says Brigadier (Retired) Khutab Hai, who heads the Mahindra Group's defence business.

The "Make" category of the DPP lays down the procedure for Indian industry to develop "high technology, complex systems", in order to "ensure Indigenous Research, Design, Development and Production of capabilities sought by the Armed Forces."

It also mandates that the MoD will fund 80% of the cost of developing each of the two FICV prototypes, while the short-listed vendors will pay 20% each. While the cost of developing and manufacturing 2600 FICVs can only be roughly estimated, senior executives from two of the competing companies estimate that the bill would add up to about Rs 50,000 crores. This makes it India's biggest-ever indigenous project.

According to the EoI, reviewed by Business Standard, the FICV has been conceived as a multi-role platform that must perform three roles. Firstly, it must be a battle-taxi that provides "mobility in battle for infantry, so that it can keep pace with armour." Secondly, it must "(p)rovide fire-support to the assaulting/dismounted infantry," i.e. spray the enemy with machine gun and cannon fire as the dismounted infantrymen charge at them. Thirdly, and most ambitiously, the FICV should hold its own on the mechanised battlefield, even against much more heavily armed tanks. According to the specifications, the FICV should "destroy enemy tanks, infantry or fortifications in conjunction with armour or independently."

The FICV must also have "adequate amphibious capability for crossing of water obstacles like canals, rivers and stretches of sea"; and be "air portable" (i.e. in a transport aircraft's cargo hold, or slung under a helicopter with chains). Its firepower must include a "fire-and-forget" third generation missile, a cannon and machine guns, which are operated through a "digital fully integrated fire control system with state of the art sensors and all weather surveillance devices."

This would allow the FICV to destroy enemy tanks more than 4 kilometres away, well before the tank can engage the FICV with its main gun. The EoI also demands the capability to destroy "attack helicopters and low flying fixed wing aircraft."

Broadsword: Setback for private defence industry. The future of the Future ICV project looks gloomy
 

agentperry

New Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
3,022
Likes
690
private sector thinks it is very smart and getting a foreign technology partner will make them eligible enough to get the contract then getting money from govt in the name of product developement and all will fetch them good money. in all they will be earning money from govt under development head, sales head and saving in R&D by getting a foreign partner
 

Akim

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
10,353
Likes
8,645
Country flag
In the Russian mass media say that Putin during his visit, offer to refuse to India from the national IFV in exchange for the transfer of technology for the production of BMP-3, although I like the model, which showed Kunal.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,245
Likes
7,531
Country flag
Most ICVs are hopelessly outgunned in an unfortunate standoff with MBTs... Isn't the idea of mounting something like GAU-8 Avenger Anti-Tank Gatling-type cannon (primary armament) on ICVs feasable? As a pseudo Mobile Gun Platform supported by ATGMs?

Sorry, but these crazy ideas keep coming to mind...
 

kshkumsin

New Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
166
Likes
62
Most ICVs are hopelessly outgunned in an unfortunate standoff with MBTs... Isn't the idea of mounting something like GAU-8 Avenger Anti-Tank Gatling-type cannon (primary armament) on ICVs feasable? As a pseudo Mobile Gun Platform supported by ATGMs?

Sorry, but these crazy ideas keep coming to mind...
well MBTs are a hell of a machine.............BUT they can't transport men.the idea behind an ICV is that it transports troops and provide support to them.Well the enormus recoil of gau 8 would topple the icv plus the ammunition is costly.Since ICV needs to only support troops thus it need not be heavily armed and also carries some ATGM for occasional confrontation with tanks.
 

kshkumsin

New Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
166
Likes
62
If INDIA chooses bmp 3 it would be a terrible setback as even russia are planning to replace them:mad:
 

Sam2012

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
743
Likes
205
Russian are pushing India hard to buy BMP-3 which might derail FICV project
 

DivineHeretic

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
1,153
Likes
1,897
Country flag
Does the tender (EOI) specify the modularity of turrets? i.e. Does it require that the turret mounted weapon system be removable and a different system be installed at short notice according to the situations and hostiles expected?
It would allow the IA to be flexible in the deployable of the IFVs and allow them to be deployable in non conventional situations.
 

Articles

Top