- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Messages
- 27,609
- Likes
- 190,936
Nothing surprising, a Kafir is bound to be intelligent enough not to believe in the fantasies of the green comic book.
Nothing surprising, a Kafir is bound to be intelligent enough not to believe in the fantasies of the green comic book.
Low IQ Mushi fan porky maggot thinks that they have dollars lying around, which will be used to repay loan once dollar gets devalued. Porkies forget that their low value textile export is already open for grab and export will get tougher with stronger PKR.
Indoneshia biwi is smart know paki inbred is pakka bahanchod
The country which came into existence on the name of religion is fast achieving what it deserved. When the pot of their sin will become full, it will be worth seeing. People will kill on other to eat. Pakistan is on its way to achieve it.
Wild wild west
It's not 7.1% but 8.8%
It is true.Source ?
Census, 2011. There are, of course, more recent surveys based on NFHS etc that claim an even bigger fall in M TFR but since I am generally skeptical over NFHS; I will not be going into the details. In fact, at this rate, Ms are projected to plateau at ~16-17% of the population in a few decades and if the claims made by the past 2 NFHS surveys are accurate even that might be an overestimation.Source on Muslim TFR falling faster than Hindus ?
Can you write about it now? Its an interesting read nglIt is true.
@FalconSlayers
Census, 2011. There are, of course, more recent surveys based on NFHS etc that claim an even bigger fall in M TFR but since I am generally skeptical over NFHS; I will not be going into the details. In fact, at this rate, Ms are projected to plateau at ~16-17% of the population in a few decades and if the claims made by the past 2 NFHS surveys are accurate even that might be an overestimation.
The upcoming census will make things clearer.
Can you write about it now? Its an interesting read ngl
Earlier estimates (based on old data) projected M population at 18% for 2050 - which, given the sharper than expected fall in their TFR, is unlikely to hold.When the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government’s health ministry released the findings of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 5) this month, it raised several eyebrows. The data showed that the Muslim fertility rate has registered the sharpest decline over the past 20 years as compared to that of other religious groups, including Hindus.
The fertility rate among Muslims has dropped to 2.3 in 2019-20 from a high of 4.4 in 1992-93. Fertility rate is the average number of children born to a woman in her lifetime.
Don't think so - given their bottom-up approaches, govt conducted surveys are generally 'fair'.Is projecting a low Indian Muslim TFR a conspiracy?
Low TFR = less population in percentage = Minority status forever.
Is projecting a low Indian Muslim TFR a conspiracy?But since I am generally skeptical over NFHS.
In fact, at this rate, Ms are projected to plateau at ~16-17% of the population in a few decades and if the claims made by the past 2 NFHS surveys are accurate even that might be an overestimation.
The upcoming census will make things clearer.
Source ?
Are you saying that the census of Paxtan conducted in Paxtan where 3/4th of the population in both wings were muslims & from where Hindus & Sikhs in one wing & Hindus & Buddhists / Animists in another wing fled & came to India yet killed more Muslims in those lands . Does this even make sense ?
Total BS, it was Jinnah who called for Direct Action day.
Why not? Don't forget major population centres of modern day pakistan were Hindu/Sikh dominant before partition. Even if sindh was muzzie majority, Karachi was Hindu majority. Most property in Lahore was owned by Sikhs and Hindus.Are you saying that the census of Paxtan conducted in Paxtan where 3/4th of the population in both wings were muslims & from where Hindus & Sikhs in one wing & Hindus & Buddhists / Animists in another wing fled & came to India yet killed more Muslims in those lands . Does this even make sense ?