IndianHawk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,674
Pretty soon there will be no Pakistan "state" and US knows this. :biggrin2:
Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings
- Thread starter A.V.
- Start date
sorcerer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,919
- Likes
- 98,471
US wont dip the hand in Balochistan obviously for many reasons which are very apparent vis a vis china.
US will use the AXIS to pivot some devious designs into Balochistan.
poor paki sods... they take almost everything for granted.
sorcerer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,919
- Likes
- 98,471
US wont dip the hand in Balochistan obviously for many reasons which are very apparent vis a vis china.
US will use the AXIS to pivot some devious designs into Balochistan.
poor paki sods... they take almost everything for granted.
IndianHawk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,674
One thing about US is clear that it's shit scared of paki nukes gone missing .
Obvious solution would be to support stability in Pakistan . Now any rational person knows that Pakistan and stability are mutually opposite terms.
It's anybody's guess what US game plan is in the long run. Meanwhile if India is going to destabilize Pakistan there is nothing much US can do about it:biggrin2:
Obvious solution would be to support stability in Pakistan . Now any rational person knows that Pakistan and stability are mutually opposite terms.
It's anybody's guess what US game plan is in the long run. Meanwhile if India is going to destabilize Pakistan there is nothing much US can do about it:biggrin2:
sorcerer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,919
- Likes
- 98,471
Why India Should Watch Pakistan Stumble Along The Road To Perdition
If India fights a war with Pak it risks a stalling of its economy (although war is good biz for many), and undermining its cachet as a peaceable country.
The World Bank/IMF estimates the size of the Indian economy in 2016 at $2.28 trillion, making it the world’s 7th largest. At $270 billion in 2015, Pakistan is the world’s 38th largest. India’s export of merchandise has powered past $300 billion and is closing on $500 billion if you count services, despite a slowdown in 2016. Pakistan’s exports are straining to get past $30 billion. India’s foreign exchange reserves stand at $367 billion; Pakistan’s is at $20 billion (which is less than the net-worth of the third richest man in India).
On almost every economic measure – industrial output, power generation capacity, foreign direct investment, etc – India has expanded its advantage to a factor of 10x or more vis-à-vis a country that is one-fourth its size, has a sixth of its population, and poses as an equal. Yet, India cannot rid itself of Pakistani pestilence in the form of episodic terrorism.
If it fights a war with Pakistan it risks a stalling of its economy (although war is good business for many), and undermining its cachet as a peaceable country. But if it doesn’t fight one to disabuse Pakistan of its belief that it can inflict a thousand cuts of terrorism under a nuclear shield, then it invites escalated provocation. It will confirm the dubious Pakistani notion of parity on the basis of a single metric: nuclear weapons, of which both countries have about equal numbers.
What then should India do?
For starters, New Delhi has signaled it is calling Pakistan’s nuclear bluff with a public announcement of a “surgical strike” across the LoC following the attack on the Indian brigade headquarters in Uri. Whether the strike actually took place, how deep and decisive it was, whether it involved crossing the LoC (all of which Pakistan has denied) are less consequential than the expression of intent, not just to Pakistan, but to the world community: India will not be deterred by Pakistani nuclear cover.
Pakistan may already be testing India’s updated doctrine with a follow-up attack in Baramulla. Doubtless more pinpricks will follow directly or through Jihadi proxies on either side of the LoC in Kashmir if India does not respond. India should, while avoiding the provocation to rush headlong into conflict before it has deployed its many leverages. Pakistan has nothing to lose in the event of a full-scale war; India has plenty to lose.
Before she went in for the war to liberate Bangladesh, then PM Indira Gandhi invested considerable time, effort and resources in preparing the ground for it, travelling the world and showing the kind of forbearance that won over hardened critics, many of them blind in the pre-internet era to Pakistani genocide. “When Hitler was on the rampage, why didn’t you say let’s keep quiet, and let’s have peace, and let Belgium die and let France die,” she asked one interviewer who preached peace talks with Yahya Khan, her eyes flashing angrily. He shriveled up.
New Delhi has much to do by way of diplomatic and public outreach to sensitize the world to Pakistani depredations not only against India, but also in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and indeed across the world, including in the West as demonstrated most recently by the pressure cooker bomb in Manhattan. Its brazen hosting of the world’s top terrorists and its nourishing of ecosystems that has exported countless jihadist overseas has already made Pakistanis the Great Unwanted across the globe.
Pakistan’s own Ministry for Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resources told the country’s legislature this week that Saudi Arabia and UAE together hosted nearly 90% of the total Pakistani workforce of 9,48,000 sent overseas last year. Jobs provided to Pakistan by some other countries: Germany 44, Turkey 57, Singapore 68, Japan 84, UK 261 and USA 350. If those numbers look suspiciously low, square it with the 2016 visa restriction index by Henley & Partners that shows Pakistan passport placed at 103 of 104 countries surveyed, in the company of Somalia and Syria.
Pakistan’s dismal global reputation was best captured in a recent internet meme that pointed out India is known for producing CEOs of Google, Microsoft, Pepsico, Mastercard, Deutsche Bank, etc. And Pakistan? For hosting heads of al-Qaida, Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Muhammed, Haqqani Group, etc. Both countries export IT services, goes another gag – Information Technology from India, and International Terrorism from Pakistan.
Islamabad has only itself to blame for its downward spiral. Cleaved from the same geographic entity, India and Pakistan took different roads to nationhood, one going uphill through the tough path of democracy and empowerment and the other on downhill ride on freebies and rental money through security pacts, mainly with the US.
The difference in the outcome is best illustrated by the effect of the US presidential elections on the two. For India, it makes no fundamental difference whether it is Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton who wins; it will thrive in either event, its strength and character recognized by bipartisan support. For Pakistan too, it does not make a difference – it will be in the pits in both scenarios. Hillary has spoken about Pakistan’s poisonous fostering of terrorism and Trump’s poll pledges could see Pakistan punished in ways unimaginable, with the US off bounds for its population.
It is a consequence of the choices Pakistan has made for itself with its embrace of toxic Islamist extremism. So India should prepare for war by all means, but without firing a shot in anger, it can watch Pakistan stumble along the road to perdition.
Source>>
If India fights a war with Pak it risks a stalling of its economy (although war is good biz for many), and undermining its cachet as a peaceable country.
The World Bank/IMF estimates the size of the Indian economy in 2016 at $2.28 trillion, making it the world’s 7th largest. At $270 billion in 2015, Pakistan is the world’s 38th largest. India’s export of merchandise has powered past $300 billion and is closing on $500 billion if you count services, despite a slowdown in 2016. Pakistan’s exports are straining to get past $30 billion. India’s foreign exchange reserves stand at $367 billion; Pakistan’s is at $20 billion (which is less than the net-worth of the third richest man in India).
On almost every economic measure – industrial output, power generation capacity, foreign direct investment, etc – India has expanded its advantage to a factor of 10x or more vis-à-vis a country that is one-fourth its size, has a sixth of its population, and poses as an equal. Yet, India cannot rid itself of Pakistani pestilence in the form of episodic terrorism.
If it fights a war with Pakistan it risks a stalling of its economy (although war is good business for many), and undermining its cachet as a peaceable country. But if it doesn’t fight one to disabuse Pakistan of its belief that it can inflict a thousand cuts of terrorism under a nuclear shield, then it invites escalated provocation. It will confirm the dubious Pakistani notion of parity on the basis of a single metric: nuclear weapons, of which both countries have about equal numbers.
What then should India do?
For starters, New Delhi has signaled it is calling Pakistan’s nuclear bluff with a public announcement of a “surgical strike” across the LoC following the attack on the Indian brigade headquarters in Uri. Whether the strike actually took place, how deep and decisive it was, whether it involved crossing the LoC (all of which Pakistan has denied) are less consequential than the expression of intent, not just to Pakistan, but to the world community: India will not be deterred by Pakistani nuclear cover.
Pakistan may already be testing India’s updated doctrine with a follow-up attack in Baramulla. Doubtless more pinpricks will follow directly or through Jihadi proxies on either side of the LoC in Kashmir if India does not respond. India should, while avoiding the provocation to rush headlong into conflict before it has deployed its many leverages. Pakistan has nothing to lose in the event of a full-scale war; India has plenty to lose.
Before she went in for the war to liberate Bangladesh, then PM Indira Gandhi invested considerable time, effort and resources in preparing the ground for it, travelling the world and showing the kind of forbearance that won over hardened critics, many of them blind in the pre-internet era to Pakistani genocide. “When Hitler was on the rampage, why didn’t you say let’s keep quiet, and let’s have peace, and let Belgium die and let France die,” she asked one interviewer who preached peace talks with Yahya Khan, her eyes flashing angrily. He shriveled up.
New Delhi has much to do by way of diplomatic and public outreach to sensitize the world to Pakistani depredations not only against India, but also in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and indeed across the world, including in the West as demonstrated most recently by the pressure cooker bomb in Manhattan. Its brazen hosting of the world’s top terrorists and its nourishing of ecosystems that has exported countless jihadist overseas has already made Pakistanis the Great Unwanted across the globe.
Pakistan’s own Ministry for Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resources told the country’s legislature this week that Saudi Arabia and UAE together hosted nearly 90% of the total Pakistani workforce of 9,48,000 sent overseas last year. Jobs provided to Pakistan by some other countries: Germany 44, Turkey 57, Singapore 68, Japan 84, UK 261 and USA 350. If those numbers look suspiciously low, square it with the 2016 visa restriction index by Henley & Partners that shows Pakistan passport placed at 103 of 104 countries surveyed, in the company of Somalia and Syria.
Pakistan’s dismal global reputation was best captured in a recent internet meme that pointed out India is known for producing CEOs of Google, Microsoft, Pepsico, Mastercard, Deutsche Bank, etc. And Pakistan? For hosting heads of al-Qaida, Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Muhammed, Haqqani Group, etc. Both countries export IT services, goes another gag – Information Technology from India, and International Terrorism from Pakistan.
Islamabad has only itself to blame for its downward spiral. Cleaved from the same geographic entity, India and Pakistan took different roads to nationhood, one going uphill through the tough path of democracy and empowerment and the other on downhill ride on freebies and rental money through security pacts, mainly with the US.
The difference in the outcome is best illustrated by the effect of the US presidential elections on the two. For India, it makes no fundamental difference whether it is Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton who wins; it will thrive in either event, its strength and character recognized by bipartisan support. For Pakistan too, it does not make a difference – it will be in the pits in both scenarios. Hillary has spoken about Pakistan’s poisonous fostering of terrorism and Trump’s poll pledges could see Pakistan punished in ways unimaginable, with the US off bounds for its population.
It is a consequence of the choices Pakistan has made for itself with its embrace of toxic Islamist extremism. So India should prepare for war by all means, but without firing a shot in anger, it can watch Pakistan stumble along the road to perdition.
Source>>
"Pakistani hackers hack Indian GPS servers, take extremely confidential information from Indian govt?
In PDF they have a thread open like that
And the things they write inside make my head hurt sometimes
1. Radio systems provide GPS location info( there might be different system or co-pilot assigned to it but it has to go through a radio system).
2. Different city has different Radio system, I mean completely different system they can't communicate between each other. There is way but I am not going to go into technical issues right now.
3. Radio systems are isolated from internet(so that no nut job can do anything on it).
4.GPS server right now is only used from time sync not for location services.
5.Mumbai polices uses EDACS system, they don't have location services available on them and point 4.
6.As far as I know almost all radio system is analogue in India and none of them has gps services for location purposes.
In PDF they have a thread open like that
And the things they write inside make my head hurt sometimes
1. Radio systems provide GPS location info( there might be different system or co-pilot assigned to it but it has to go through a radio system).
2. Different city has different Radio system, I mean completely different system they can't communicate between each other. There is way but I am not going to go into technical issues right now.
3. Radio systems are isolated from internet(so that no nut job can do anything on it).
4.GPS server right now is only used from time sync not for location services.
5.Mumbai polices uses EDACS system, they don't have location services available on them and point 4.
6.As far as I know almost all radio system is analogue in India and none of them has gps services for location purposes.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2016
- Messages
- 486
- Likes
- 2,114
Foreign Office without an email id
in Editor Choice 2015-07-24 22:50:33
Foreign office without an email address
Jalil Afridi
Washington, D.C: The Ministry of Foreign Office of the government of Pakistan has no official email id through which it can be contacted.
The website of the foreign office www.mofa.gov.pk is amongst the few foreign office website of any country which does not have an official email id through which it be contacted.
All over the world most of the countries foreign office can be contacted through their websites which indicates the email address of the different departments with in the ministry and many other departments can also be contacted through their email addresses.
Unfortunately Pakistan's foreign office website is not only poor displayed but it is also managed in a very unprofessional manner. No office of the foreign ministry of Pakistan can be contacted through an email id whereas only handouts of the advisors of the foreign office such as Sartaj Aziz and Syed Fatimi are displayed on regular basis.
Here
Lol. Mofa - mothafackers
in Editor Choice 2015-07-24 22:50:33
Foreign office without an email address
Jalil Afridi
Washington, D.C: The Ministry of Foreign Office of the government of Pakistan has no official email id through which it can be contacted.
The website of the foreign office www.mofa.gov.pk is amongst the few foreign office website of any country which does not have an official email id through which it be contacted.
All over the world most of the countries foreign office can be contacted through their websites which indicates the email address of the different departments with in the ministry and many other departments can also be contacted through their email addresses.
Unfortunately Pakistan's foreign office website is not only poor displayed but it is also managed in a very unprofessional manner. No office of the foreign ministry of Pakistan can be contacted through an email id whereas only handouts of the advisors of the foreign office such as Sartaj Aziz and Syed Fatimi are displayed on regular basis.
Here
Lol. Mofa - mothafackers
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 731
- Likes
- 1,688
What about qandeel baloch and the numerous honour killings happened in your pakiland. How can you make a crime committed by an individual a collective of a whole nation. Desperation too has a limit. Or else go to a psychiatrist
Sent from my Redmi 3S using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,419
- Likes
- 2,819
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,720
- Likes
- 11,632
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,720
- Likes
- 11,632
looks like he is going to blow himself somewhere
Abhinav Dharma
Regular Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2016
- Messages
- 174
- Likes
- 78
ISI running sex racket to trap PORNISTANI politicians
THEY MAY USE THIs AGinst Our sexually hungry indian men too
PORNISTANI spy agency, Inter Service Intelligence [ISI] is running sex racket, which comprises lollywood stars, models, college and university students which is regularly used in trapping politicians, members of the civil society as well as journalists.
ISI traps female and male politicians, who get engaged into illicit romantic or extra-marital relations and regularly bug their telephone calls as well as secretly follow their movements within and outside the country.
The sex racket traps of ISI, which is codenamed 'Dilruba' gets funding from illegal drug trafficking as well as dealing in counterfeit Indian currencies, which are regular source of hidden earning of the Pakistani espionage agency. According to information, each year ISI protected drug paddler traffic 50-55 tons of narcotics from the Pakistani frontier and Afghanistan to various nations .
It is also learnt from a number of sources that ISI are occasionally using their diplomatic pouches in trafficking narcotics and drugs mostly to European destinations.
SOURCE - ISI running sex racket to trap politicians :: Weekly Blitz
Last edited:
mayfair
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 6,032
- Likes
- 13,109
Sounds like..
"Will you frandship me...."
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2016
- Messages
- 486
- Likes
- 2,114
RR can do the honors
............
guys come on this is something personal, hope you remove it.
Brood Father
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2015
- Messages
- 3,676
- Likes
- 15,059
BKL ....less than 1/6 attire dikha ke bolta hai kee look at my dress .
Dense choo%$$&
