The basis of this thing is wrong Kashmir is in our side what they have is, shia gilgit which is now filled with Pakistani sunnis... And west to Kashmir, Jammu is what they call Azad kashmir.. which is way more radicalised I have seen some generals saying Azad K. Is way more radical than gilgit.
They keep on deep throating their inbred ork awaam in the name of plebiscite:
1. The whole UN paperwork was non binding.
2. Even if it was ever implemented pakistan has to remove all its army and Indian Army to go in to all the areas.
3. After 1971 war Shimla Agreement which was signed by porkstan, it was agreed and signed that the issue is bilateral in nature so burying non binding UN paperwork.
4. Indian hindus were ethnically genocide by kashrmi mullas with terrorists from pakistan fully sponsored by paki army.
5. On the paki side these fckers gave away lands to china from their occupied area.
6. Gilgit baltistan has been ran over by porki invreds, from army to politicians creating houses thr to normi paki green fungus
7. So called Azad Kashmir is a low Jammu pahari area again most ppl are panjabi speaking with some paharis.
8. India has legal agreement signed by Dogra king for full control of erstwhile region. Traitor Nehru should have never gone to UN, Indian Army would have taken over the region with in few weeks.