First, where have I mentioned about 100's of bombers attacking us simultaneously. I have only said if one squadron of enemy planes attack. A squadron in IAF practice means maximum of 18 to 20 aircraft. First clear your mind.
Did you answer my question - if our airspace is going to be violated by a technologically superior enemy using 5th and 6th generation planes which cannot be countered by our air defence network, should we just bend over and surrender.
Russian military have one proverb regarding effectiveness of Air Defence System," Its like female's pubic hair, it cover the P##sy, but can't protect it."
Thats why USSR discarded Nuclear tipped SAM in favour of capable interceptors.
Even when you don't have 5th or 6th generation fighter, still you can counter it with tactics, Electronic Warfare & precise intelligence. Even poor Serbia shown it.
Its not movie that squadron of fighter bombers come & paralyse the country.
Even in Desert Storm it took thousands of sortie per day against Iraq.
Still they were fearful of their obsolete Scuds Missiles.
Can't India Simply bomb the shit out of that country with Cruise & Ballistic Missiles ?
Why are you against India fielding nuclear capable Sam's?.
Most Stealth bombers have standoff weapons, how would you guide such SAM's against stealth planes who also may carry Anti Radiation Missiles as well.
Do you know a 0.2 kt nuclear blast would have a direct blast effect on only a few hundred meters
What would be radiation effect for densely populated country like in India in short & long term?
We would not be detonating on land but several thousand feet in the air.
All Nuclear bombs denonate up in Air to make maximum damage.
Our national airspace extends a bit beyond our land borders. So the nuclear blast could well be over the sea.
Enemy would not submit their attack plan to us & not fight according to our convinience.
Even talk of India possessing such a capability will make an potential adversary think 10 times before contemplating bombing in India using manned planes.
And 12000 km ICBM & 2500 - 3000 Km Cruise Missile, Hypersonic missile, SSBN armed with SLBM even with conventional warhead would not
The militaries of the world still have thousands of manned aircraft.
So Does India
Whose side are you on, man.
When there is talk of India building ICBM's we hear voices in the country saying it is unnecessary. Why this attempt to derail our strategic choices.
I am the most vocal supporter of ICBM, long rage cruise missile, SSN & SSBN & large defence order but our force only order piecemeal size order.
Even if we make ICBM then what. They would order may be 10 to 12 piece
As I mentioned earlier this option will be exercised only in extraordinary circumstances.
Simply repeating
'Good luck in nuking your own country
Good luck in nuking your own country'
does not make you any smarter.
Enough of Dhoti shivering
Why not simply take offensive stance, induct advance Radar, EW suites & Solution & capable interceptor in large nos.
Here IAF happily flying MIG 21 instead of LCA & you are dreaming of Nuclear SAM
Fu@kers shooting their own Helicopter despite IFF, crashing any plane in the inventory like piece of cake & you expecting to these incompetents to handle N-SAMS
www.indiatoday.in
