Army is more interested in a man portable atgm.....that may be the sole reason....
The seeker issue of nag atgm rectified
Spike atgm was unable to recognise it's target in hot desert condition,which nag easily hits...
I have come across some reason s given by friends in sm and here too..... trying to refute their claims
1.some says that nag is over weight
My point is nag is not a mpatgm,it has its own carrier namica.
2.some says namica is tin can,can't move
When nag and namica developed ,only bmp2 was available,and only bmp2 is the only amphibious platform available with army
If bmp2 is a tin can they why army recently ordered more bmp2s
3.Nag has problem with seeker
Spike was unable to recognise target s,in hot desert condition,but nag atgm achieved bulls eye,in previous test mpatgm variant of nag also struck it's target in desert.Then it has problem,how nag cleared trials
4.Nag has production issue
How many nags ordered,
Helina
1.Helina is not good as helifire
Ok helina is not good as helifire,is not helina cheaper than helifire
Then I too believe some improvement s should be done.
1.The namica carrier should have latest bmp2 update s
2.whap with nag atgm should be developed
Again ia didn't have a similar platform ,so nag should be inducted
I have seen people crying here tejas doesn't have this....that....
Now Tejas ioc is flying with bvrs.....
So without armed forces support.... Atmanirbhar bharat will not............ possible
What happened to that? Did it not go through? https://m.economictimes.com/news/de...h-over-rs-3600-crore/articleshow/63942467.cms
