Can the good people of DFI help me test this theory?
Supporting and opposing views welcome.
Theory: Purchase of foreign equipment or munitions are not being allowed to go ahead unless there is a domestic alternative in the same category, since 2015.
There maybe a few exceptions like chinook, but it’s not a rule.
Our defence procurement decisions are too complex to be bound by a theory. There is dangerous combinations of domestic capacity Vs foreign interests. Developing products Vs mature off the shelf solutions. Private Vs PSU qualifications . Operational necessity Vs strategic independence. Two front war Vs cold start type punishment to Pakistan.
So many more conflicts are inbuilt. But overall intent of this govt is to chose indigenous over foreign that is visible from new service chiefs and their more supportive statements for indigenous equipment which is a stark difference from past.
Also the domestic capabilities have grown multifold over previous decade ( including in private sector ) and with new generation of confidant young Indians in charge is shifted the balance. Examples are how DRDO was adamant on mpatgm and how hal brought up htt40 despite all opposition. Similarly LCA has spanned LCA mk1a/ mwf amca and now tedbf/ orca.
We are pretty sure of what we want now that's why we walked out of pakfa we are confident we can do better ! This increasing confidence is reflecting itself at policy level to some extent . Previous govt wouldn't have courage to walk out of something as hyped and important as fgfa. This one did.
It seems we are finally breaking the chains of colonial mentality and inferiority complex at all levels including institutional and policy level.
That's my two cents. I went off topic probably but couldn't resist .