LKF601E is famously claimed to be air-cooled AESA radar... KLJ-7A is said to have the same performance specifications as that one, which are already lower than undertrial Uttam's, inspite of DRDO's typical conservative claims.Klj 7a is liquid cooled radar that will be used in jf 17 then why it is said air cooled.
KLJ-7A is famously claimed to be the world’s first air-cooled AESA radar.
Typo... I edited my reply. Reload the page.View attachment 40795 but it says something else
So jf 17 will use air cooled radar.Typo... I edited my reply. Reload the page.
No, but it will use will be of same performance as air-cooled one which, even by Chinese boastings, is inferior to Uttam's (which will take a few more years to mature. A2G seems to be unsatisfactory compared to A2A mode.)So jf 17 will use air cooled radar.
Buying SATCOM for every squad in the Indian Army must be expensive. The communications engineer must dismount, pull out a huge pack and assemble the antenna assembly, track the satellite location and establish a connection. He can't move while transmitting and then must tear it all down and repack for the next location. To top it off you must have enough bandwith on your telcom satellites to maintain the traffic of the entire Indian Army. I don't think the US even has enough bandwidth to do that.it's inter squad communication networks every small group's like composition of 3 to 10 have this set up where one with stat com act as mother node it will be mesh network in to others thus using Bluetooth as communication protocol its will be suitable for small company size networked soldiers aporch, but other things they showcased pretty much common things the bit vault secure phone also nothing new
Weight of klj 7a is 145kg it is not suitable for light aircraft.No, but it will use will be of same performance as air-cooled one which, even by Chinese boastings, is inferior to Uttam's (which will take a few more years to mature. A2G seems to be unsatisfactory compared to A2A mode.)
If it really detects 5m² RCS at 170, Tejas Mark1 can have date 17 within No Escape Zone of its BVR even before it gets located.
How can you say it is inferior?No, but it will use will be of same performance as air-cooled one which, even by Chinese boastings, is inferior to Uttam's (which will take a few more years to mature. A2G seems to be unsatisfactory compared to A2A mode.)
If it really detects 5m² RCS at 170km, then 0.5m² Tejas Mark1 can have it within its No Escape Zone (NEZ) of its BVR even before it gets located... Tejas will track Jf-17 from atleast 100-120km away.
From whatever is publicly available...How can you say it is inferior?
If it really detects 5m² RCS at 170km, then Tejas Mark1(0.5m²) can have Jf-17 Block3 within both its Astra & Derby BVR's No Escape Zone even before getting located itself... Uttam or ELTA radar in Tejas will be able to track Jf-17(1.5-2m²) from atleast 100-120km away.
not really actually its a just a tranreceiver just like handhelds, there was a prototype I saw in Milan international exhibition in Italy can't recollect its name,the version u said used for mostly Base or camp operation not for mobile operationsBuying SATCOM for every squad in the Indian Army must be expensive. The communications engineer must dismount, pull out a huge pack and assemble the antenna assembly, track the satellite location and establish a connection. He can't move while transmitting and then must tear it all down and repack for the next location. To top it off you must have enough bandwith on your telcom satellites to maintain the traffic of the entire Indian Army. I don't think the US even has enough bandwidth to do that.
It's mesh network based communication system.Class 1 works upto 100mtrs.
With use of repeaters, the distance could be extended further.
Wonder why MOD never consider these potential gem of an idea and equipment.A private company called VNL has developed a Mobile Integrated Network Terminal (MINT), which has been tested at various locations by the army for the last 1.5 years. It is to established broadband connectivity to the soldiers in very remote areas. The smallest versions is a manpack, which can be carried by a soldier on his back,with 4 hours battery life. Connectivity options include SATCOM, microwave and OFC. Supports data speed of upto 100 Mbps. Also can be made to run on solar power.
Those tactical radios you are speaking of don't directly talk to the satellite, they talk to a much bigger Ka SATCOM node mounted on a communications vehicle or base camp station. Their range is only LOS to the node. That is why France is using Aerostat communication nodes to extend the range of that LOS.not really actually its a just a tranreceiver just like handhelds, there was a prototype I saw in Milan international exhibition in Italy can't recollect its name,the version u said used for mostly Base or camp operation not for mobile operations
Don't take what this Russian guy says too seriously. He makes video saying Leclerc is obsolete when he basis it off of 90s configuration disregarding the MLU. He is a total clown.this moron again made one video about arjun seems like he is obsessed with us and taking out his frustration every time he wants.
Problem with us is that we associate each and every product out there with Army, Navy or Airforce and think from that perspective.It doesn't matter what the node is, if the soldier can't go more than 100 meters away from it then he is tethered to it. Does every squad have SATCOM in their unit?