- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,416
- Likes
- 56,946
I think India has substantial consumption in nuclear energy. It will have even more when it starts to operate 10-15 nuclear submarines as planned.India has nuclear stockpile. India simply does not talk but about it. India produces 2000kg of plutonium every day from its phwr reactors from indigenous uranium. That is about 500 bombs every year. India has enough plutonium to make large number of bombs by now.
Between every war and peacetime, there is a period of great tensions. ICBM will have to be tested when tensions to this degree are there.Who decides need? You do? Any weapon is not needed when there is no war. But when there is war, every weapon will be needed. Obviously, ICBM is unnecessary when there is no war. But we make it to be used when war happens. So, what is your logic in saying there is no need to test? We will need every weapon possible and we must get it. Period.
If you notice, you will see that I was replying to that retard who thinks giving code names of London & Washington to small islands and bombing them brings any kind of glory to India.
Any attack by West on China or vice versa is a suicide attack. Collective west however instead of US alone may win by a considerable margin but they won't be able to sustain their dominance as leading powers thereafter.How is that? Are you saying if west does suicide attack, China will be ruined? That is true. But then the west will be completely destroyed.
Once again, that idiot claimed that west is scared of China because of ICBM. Fact is China has much more than ICBM. ICBM is just a part of this.
Just testing an ICBM won't land India into league of PRC. A lot lot of aspects and contexts are needed to lead the world.