NoobWannaLearn
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2022
- Messages
- 8,978
- Likes
- 29,244
Reforms in the DRDO or any other organisation like HAL etc with the objective of improvement in its working efficiency are certainly welcome.I agree with your sentiment, but we need to be rational about it. DRDO needs reform. This new narrative that reforming DRDO means an end to indigenous products. I don't buy it. There are genuine inefficiencies in that organisation. Also, it seems to me that they need to use the DCPP model a lot more frequently.
Moreover, License production with 100% tech transfer can be good too, after all, Hermes gives you another manufacturer of drones. Manufacturing and Design both are important. China didn't just make what we call "IDDM" most of the time. Sometimes they just buy the design off the shelf (Lavi -> J10) or purchase IPR for certain components, they do license production and then reverse-engineering, etc. They did all this to build up the manufacturing capacity of their companies. Indian PSU also become capable of manufacturing weapons by license production.
What??Most likely ijt
Ijt will be part of suryakiranWhat??
Kia ho Raha he bhai thakk Gaya hu me to salute to all of you who are here for years.
Yea navy seems interested in operating them from A&N Islands another Navy WDRDO to continue with Tapas drone project, to expand its capabilities to operate above 30,000 ft
Read more At:
Seems a small no of tapas gonna inducted , most probably by navy