Only against ground based radars.
This is the best i could come up with with my shitty drawing skill but if you could show some angles that suggest huge radar returns please do and do keep in mind modern fighters calculate the position of canards such that they send the least return in the specific case.
Let me explain in layman language- Spectra is like a smoke grenade. Now, imagine you are walking in a flat desert and suddenly you spot an area of 50sqm covered in think smoke. You will immediately realise that there is someone there. Although you won't be able to pinpoint the location of the person who measures only 0.3sqm in area, you will know that there is a person within that 50sqm.
Moreover usage of canards can be restricted to maneuvering rest during most of its fight part it could stay aligned with body
Mh60R is suitable for amphibious attacks which is what US navy intends. But India needs helicopters for ASW & patrolling of pirates and boats. Indian navy is not capable of amphibious landing or fighting. USA navy has many aircraft carriers and its naval fighter jets number 600 which is as much as the IAF fighter jets! Without such carriers and naval fighter jets, the amphibious attack doctrine won't work.
This is called privatisation. India is developing private industry by giving TOT from DRDO. ADE has developed the technology and only wants the private company to design it and then manufacture/assemble it with DRDO's help
Imaging using helicopters to fight against Pakistani coastal defence! That will be suicide. Amphibious warfare requires one to have huge aircraft carrier groups and carrier based fighter jets to first clear the way. It is not feasible for India at all even if India buys hundreds of Mh60 helos.
They will roll out the RFI when inflation would've raised the cost of the press to $ 500M.
You telling me how to be an Indian you Chinese simp??
then don’t use the analogy of using light rays. Use something else. The canards will prevent your planes from ever being stealthy no matter what because it cannot prevent the radar rays from being reflected back towards the receiver.
IAF and USAF disagree with you. They have spotted them using MKI radars and AWACs from hundreds of miles away.
I’m typing on a iPhone right now. So can’t really draw. It doesn’t matter what angle is optimum because the problem is that the canards are movable objects. In order to maintain flight stability and stealthy it has to be locked in one position. That’s great and fine if the plane is only moving in a straight line. But planes don’t. They have to move around and maneuver. The minute they do that the stealth is compromised because they have to move the canards in order to turn and maneuver and that optimum angle goes away. They will light up on the radar screen in seconds.
Comon mateYou telling me how to be an Indian you Chinese simp??
At least I’m not the one who keeps liking and simping Chinese post after Chinese post. Living in India does not necessarily make you a true Indian Mr Sherlock Holmes.
LOL
Your post makes me laugh.Comon mate
Hypocrisy has a limit
Sitting in America and simping for a party makes u Indian
Is that what u think?
Bared from language culture tradition and then simping for a party doesn't make u Indian
Better have a introspection before questioning other's nationality
I responded bcoz u started it
Now this convo may derail the thread
Nor I am interested to drag it further to other thread
Keep it up. I suppose we all need our village clown to keep us amused.It's called coping.
Even NATO F35 fly with Luneberg lense.
They were on record saying that they spotted them without the use of Luneberg lenses.
Source.
One with pseudo superiority complex and no technical reasoning won't understand mate
