It meansNot a hitjob ....why im so sure?...simply because mod didnt release any statement
It meansNot a hitjob ....why im so sure?...simply because mod didnt release any statement
Its fail or succeed, how can you say that. In India defence related things are very secret.It means View attachment 191674 this was a failure too.
Weight of 81 mm shell is 4 kg compared to 13 kg of 120 mm. What is the weight penalty in that case? For one 120 mm shell, you could carry three 81 mm shell in simple mathematical term.Vehicle can carry 120mm mortar easily, that's also a thing to take in account. And mounted design also separate recoil from the vehicle so there's that too.
To me more like a doctrinal issue than the weight issue.
I am not saying anything. I am just reiterating what people are saying here. If no official release of HSTDV means a failure, then the last A5 test should also be considered a failure.Its fail or succeed, how can you say that. In India defence related things are very secret.
War thunder strikes again...Chinese APDS is crap
View attachment 191533
What doctrinal issue ? Infantry battalions employ the 120mm mortar in Siachen with no input from any arty formation.. This was around 2016.Vehicle can carry 120mm mortar easily, that's also a thing to take in account. And mounted design also separate recoil from the vehicle so there's that too.
To me more like a doctrinal issue than the weight issue.
Yes sir I have. , And a mounted mortar should hit hard .Mass of a 81mm Mortar with accessories is 45 kg opposed to 248 kg of a 120 mm mortar.
Have you taken this into account?
Yes. But you need a suitable vehicle for a 120 mm mortar. Have a look at a similar system.Yes sir I have. , And a mounted mortar should hit hard .
A 120 mm mortar packs more punch
Infantry can get on with their 81 mm ones and 51 mm ones
But can't a 1 ton vehicle carry a 248 kg motar with ammo ?Yes. But you need a suitable vehicle for a 120 mm mortar. Have a look at a similar system.
Just pay attention on the vehicle they are using. They are not using a 1 tonner LSV for the system. In our case, we are using a 1 tonner.
I am saying it as an hitjob bcoz it's reported by Rajat pandit and I personally think he is very much critical towards drdo and isroI am not saying anything. I am just reiterating what people are saying here. If no official release of HSTDV means a failure, then the last A5 test should also be considered a failure.
People might not be paying attention that GOI has stopped giving updates of each and every tests off late.
Someone once told me, "You can make a system doesn't mean you can sell it".But can't a 1 ton vehicle carry a 248 kg motar with ammo ?
I guess it can't , then why not get a heavier vehicle to mount it ?
A mounted mortar must be a 120 mm one , we have even mounted 81 mm mortars on carrier mortar tracked based on bmp 2 chassy, when a bmp for all purposes can even carry a 160 mm one .
But india is india .
Have you seen the Mahindra alsv mortar carrier, how does recoil factor into that???Weight of 81 mm shell is 4 kg compared to 13 kg of 120 mm. What is the weight penalty in that case? For one 120 mm shell, you could carry three 81 mm shell in simple mathematical term.
The design of the Mortar carrier is to fire it from ground instead of firing it from onboard. It means the hydraulics would have to strengthen keeping in mind the 5 times weight penalty. This in turn would increase the overall weight and signature of the vehicle keeping the mind the magazine it would have to carry.
So there is some valid reason to choose 81 mm over 120 mm.
Instead of talking about mounting a 120 mm on a LMV, ATTM like solution is much better.
View attachment 191679
Well. Hopefully not the ratios and stuff.
It would be fired from ground. So the recoil would be on the mounting arms and vibration would propagate to the chassis through it.Have you seen the Mahindra alsv mortar carrier, how does recoil factor into that???
I believe the designers have kept that in mind and should be quite minimum. If it pass trials, all good.It would be fired from ground. So the recoil would be on the mounting arms and vibration would propagate to the chassis through it.