DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Optimus

New Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2022
Messages
740
Likes
2,089
Country flag
If people are thinking this is enough of trials for Nag or Helina then you are wrong again by miles.

In next 6 months, we will again witness Final user trials and ready for Induction news.

Forces keep taking trials until there is some issue occurs (Even minor ) so they can declare trials as a failure and send missile back to drowing board for years.

Unfortunately, Nag/HeliNa is not failing Hence Endless trials are needed. Even if succeeded then UN armed forces will order around 200-300 missiles only. They will make sure all money, affords, and time should be wasted.
But didn’t this happened ? Curios 🤔
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
I didn’t even knew about these things i considered armed forces saints as my uncle was a very honest officer fck them
40-60% of the price we pay for any household consumer product we buy, is earmarked for sales and marketing budget. for a half a trillion $ annual global market even in peace times, you do the calculation on monies available for distribution even at lower end of the range.
 

Rassil Krishnan

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
2,112
Likes
9,256
Country flag
Anyone who has worked in forces or the procurement team of the Armed Forces could enlighten us about the testing protocol? Is it like developed along with PSQRs/GSQR? Or developed separately? Or evolves with time as the product has come? Like in this case, if "high altitude" trials were to be done, why not to have it done in parallel on a separate Rudra stationed in Leg/Ladakh? Or was it not planned initially and the idea of testing it in Ladakh developed during the course of testing in Rajasthan? Trial and Testing is one serious blackbox area. Testing protocol should be ideally finalised against the SQRs(functional requirement) and general requirements (Build quality parameters, maintainability parameters etc). It's not as if Ladakh has come into India's possession in 2021 and we decided to test our weapons for its suitability in a new terrain altogether
isnt psqr/gsqr system over from now onwards,so cant they skip it for the ongoing trials as well.and also isnt there a provision now that armed forces must order within 3-6 months of trial completion.
 

Rassil Krishnan

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
2,112
Likes
9,256
Country flag
Honestly the reason could be literally anything.For starters this is probably our first homegrown heli launched atgm right?Then both drdo and the armed forces have to adapt with it both as the developer and the feedback customer. For people saying,army is sabotaging. I partially agree,but if they were to sabotage wouldn't it make more sense to integrate foreign atgms here?

Maybe I have way too much copium left compared to the other users here,but thankfully all the tests that are suddenly being brought up are also being cleared properly.
i think they are not ordering because army is in a bind now,because they have got a perfect set of circumstances where they are not allowed to import and many homemade solutions are maturing and also their method of testing and ordering has also been meddled into.

i think they would have gone through their usual games but got blindsided by external and internal changes and factors and will be forced to induct,they are on their last legs i think.
 

Chinmoy

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag
Credible logic.
Be cautious and only buy what is effective. However, if we go by the Army's process of acquiring weapons, they float out tender, then bids are submitted, then testing, then L1 bidder, then order. The whole process takes something like 5-6 years. Then the time to deliver the order is extra 3-5 years depending on the equipment.

By the time it actually is in hands of the army, it is long outdated by current standards.

Either trust your own trials or take some risk. Every armed force in the world orders equipment in numbers before using them for 10 years.
If you go by DAP 2020 chapter 2, if the production agency is involved in developmental trails, then there would be single user trial for the system.

Reason why DRDO started floating out tenders for developmental and production partner in recent projects.
 

Arpuster

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Messages
160
Likes
373
Country flag
Nasm mr will be subsonic a supersonic missile will be much more costly and unnecessary since we already have brahmos....we currently need subsonic, cheap missiles that can be build and fired in large numbers
I agree with your opinion bt still i feel CATS hunter can do the job of subsonic missile since it will have stealth & loitering capabilities without which subsonic missiles are vulnerable. On the other hand STAR based NASM-MR will be much cheaper than brahmos NG and will be a natural progression from exocet transonic missile.
 

flanker99

New Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
2,499
Likes
14,165
Country flag
I agree with your opinion bt still i feel CATS hunter can do the job of subsonic missile since it will have stealth & loitering capabilities without which subsonic missiles are vulnerable. On the other hand STAR based NASM-MR will be much cheaper than brahmos NG and will be a natural progression from exocet transonic missile.
Not always needed and some of these capabilities will increase cost of the missile we need a sub 300km subsonic missile thats as cheap as possible,has to be reliable and accurate which is exactly what nasm mr will be.
Due to complexities involved a star based CM will definitely be pricier than a subsonic CM but i suspect the technology will find itself on some missile sooner or later
 

Articles

Top