SilentKiller
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 799
- Likes
- 377
Sir, that's why i suggested that we can start replacing all T-72 tanks with MBT arjun tanks, say 100-200 each year.You need to take in to consideration economics and logistics.
IMHO I would leave all current designs, be it T-72, T-90 and Arjun as their are and abandone their further evolution.
Instead there is a nececity for radical rethinking the vehicle design, and there are several questions to answer.
Do you need a dedicated base platform? No, it is better to design an unified platform (you can design several such platforms in different weight classed, be it wheeled or tracked).
Such solution is logical, unified platform means you do not waste huge pile of money and time as well as other resources on different dedicated platforms but a platforms with unified components like suspension, engine, transmission, electronics etc.
You can have both an Main Battle Tank and Heavy Infantry Fighting Vehicle for army heavy brigades, well armored, unified, which reduce production costs, logistic problems (they can for example use exactly the same engine, transmission and suspension, as well as wheeld and tracks), and also training, remember that you train not only crews but also maintnance personell.
On such platforms you can place also special variants, like Armored Revocery Vehicles, Command Vehicles, SPAAG's, SPGH's, MEDEVAC's etc.
With such concept in mind, it is foolishness to waste all avaiable resources on existing vehicle designs.
then we can convert these T-72 in light 105 mm tanks, heavy IFV's etc.
Israel also do same with its old tanks.
we are familiar with T-72 tanks so this should be not an issue.