rockdog
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 4,078
- Likes
- 2,945
Guess who made this kind of diagram?
Guess who made this kind of diagram?
To be fair what comac does so does Embraer, most subsystems are foreign, but C919 is already in big disadvantage to A-220, and A-321XLR in terms of ticket price
The C919 is a massive failure for Comac China and the program has only continued due to the necessity of public image. The original design goals were not met.To be fair what comac does so does Embraer, most subsystems are foreign, but C919 is already in big disadvantage to A-220, and A-321XLR in terms of ticket price
I think XLR is not in the market yet. But 321Neo vs C919 for Shanghai to Chengdu, the pricing are the same, there is some extra $20 discount for 919, so the actual price is lower than 321neo.To be fair what comac does so does Embraer, most subsystems are foreign, but C919 is already in big disadvantage to A-220, and A-321XLR in terms of ticket price
I think XLR is not in the market yet. But 321Neo vs C919 for Shanghai to Chengdu, the pricing are the same, there is some extra $20 discount for 919, so the actual price is lower than 321neo.
View attachment 208342
and they shared some subsystems, like they used the same seats from a Chinese vendor.
View attachment 208343
Range | 7400 km |
Mmo | M0.82 |
Why do you Indians make these things up? China has always said they are using foreign subsystems like every other airliner in the world:
Merely pointing out that the Chinese airliner has a plethora of foreign owned sub systems just as Chinese members across forums & years have been pointing out the Tejas had plenty of foreign sub systems in it too , the most vital difference being China's in a state of cold war with all those nations supplying such sub systems whereas India isn't.Why do you Indians make these things up? China has always said they are using foreign subsystems like every other airliner in the world:
View attachment 208378
And they've highly publicized the CJ1000A engine that they are working on as an alternative to the LEAP C so replacing some of the foreigns is very well understood.
Also, the foreign components on the C919 are very well known to the Chinese public because the AirBus assembly line in Tianjin is very well known!
So Chinese people understand how airliners are built far more than people who never built an airliner and, to be frank, sound very jealous
View attachment 208379
Ur logic is funny, you raised the topic about price, i show you who had lower price. Then you said low price means discount and loss money.The A321neo is the longest-fuselage member of Airbus’ best-selling, single-aisle A320 Family, comfortably seating 180 to 220 passengers in a typical two-class interior layout, and as many as 244 in a higher-density arrangement.
Range 7400 km Mmo M0.82
A321neo
The A321 is the longest-fuselage member of Airbus’ best-selling, single-aisle A320 Family, comfortably seating 170 to 200 passengers in a typical two-class interior layout, and as many as 220 in a higher-density arrangement.aircraft.airbus.com
The neo is cheaper has longer range and more passengers, At this moment not Embraer or Boeing can compete with Airbus much less comac and the discount you mention is losing money
You know very well, his main point was that China is "hiding" the foreign components to its people. That sounds like so much sour grapes to us ChineseMerely pointing out that the Chinese airliner has a plethora of foreign owned sub systems just as Chinese members across forums & years have been pointing out the Tejas had plenty of foreign sub systems in it too , the most vital difference being China's in a state of cold war with all those nations supplying such sub systems whereas India isn't.
While China's achievement in this field is commendable the true test lies in China indigenizing those sub systems at the earliest. Which means the more such aircrafts China turns out with such sub systems the more it digs a hole for itself. You don't want to get into the kind of situation Russia's in now , do you ?
Highly publicized - yes , yet how many articles in Mandarin have gotten into granular details of it's sub systems & components ? The devil lies in the details . CCP is busy spreading the propoganda that this is a totally indigenous effort . It's called being economical with the truth.You know very well, his main point was that China is "hiding" the foreign components to its people. That sounds like so much sour grapes to us Chinese
The whole CJ1000/2000/500 programs are highly publicized to the Chinese people and are pursued because of the very vulnerability you talked about.
This is also the reason why China helped to create massive eco-systems for Airbus and Safran (do you know that Chinese components are made at Safran factories in China and shipped to Europe to assembled the Leap-C and then re-shipped back to China and installed on the C919 in Shanghai?)
China did the same for Apple and Tesla. Ripping out that supply chain is not easy nor losing that capacity in China -- Tianjin will have two assembly lines just like France
Which is why we want the Chinese to build as many of the C 919 & ARJ-21 as they can using western sub systems. You can add thousands of kms of MAGLEV / Hyperloop to it too. If only to prove to all those nations that not only can China develop & build all these but they can scale it up tremendously.The jealous people would turn even greener with envy when the CJ1000A comes online with CJ2000 for the C929 coming soon after that
View attachment 208380
People of a country who never built an airliner, who never dared to attempt it in a project, should really think before saying anything about the C919 to a country and people who is already mass producing the ARJ-21 and who have engine programs in place. It sounds like so much sour grapes
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...fly-the-world-riding-on-1-3-billion-subsidiesUr logic is funny, you raised the topic about price, i show you who had lower price. Then you said low price means discount and loss money.
If you already had conclusion, why u came to thread?
Again, you Indians are making things up.Highly publicized - yes , yet how many articles in Mandarin have gotten into granular details of it's sub systems & components ? The devil lies in the details . CCP is busy spreading the propoganda that this is a totally indigenous effort . It's called being economical with the truth.
Those Airbus lines in Tianjin are assembly lines with certain offsets to comply with CCP requirements . Pls don't delude yourself into thinking these Chinese supply chains don't have redundancy.
Nobody is "jealous" of your Stolen technology.So Chinese people understand how airliners are built far more than people who never built an airliner and who, to be frank, sound very jealous of Chinese people and the C919
It is pretty obvious that you people are very jealousNobody is jealous of your Stolen technology.
Chinese are stealing aviation tech from United States for the past 2 decades.
After stealing trade secrets from US and Europe, Chinese tagged them as indigenous tech.
View attachment 208388
Again, you Indians are making things up.
China has always let its people know that C919 has foreign subsystems like every other airliner in the world and that for China is a vulnerability!
One picture is worth a thousand words and for Chinese this is one of the most famous and most cited aviation photos ever:
View attachment 208384
Why? Because the Chinese people know:
1) the Y-20 is a massive aircraft, largest military transport still being built anywhere; we know you cannot just buy them off market; that is why China has this project,
2) this particular Y-20 is a flying testbed; there are very, very few in the world and is critical to developing new engines; this is why China built this plane and building more,
3) it is testing a domestic turbofan for the C919 called the CJ1000A; the most critical foreign component to an airliner and the most vulnerable to embargo; that is why China needs this engine program along other classes of engines.
This vulnerability is a constant drumbeat in China. Everyone know that they are vulnerable and that they need a "all of society" approach to solving them.
So it is very stupid for people to say that China "hides" the foreign components, the CPC explicitly advertize those vulnerabilities to push the entire Chinese society into building domestic solutions.
I think people who do not have a large plane program, do not have a flying testbed and are waiting for some foreign company to just give them an engine have no idea how Chinese people know and are working to solve foreign dependencies
Remember that Thomas Jefferson quotation & the lengthy explanation I had to provide you .It is pretty obvious that you people are very jealous
If it is just stolen technology then why all the foreign firms willing to work with COMAC on the C919?
Sure. Post tweets from Twitter an SM banned in China. How many Chinese actually do have access to VPN & thus Twitter ?Well known and well understood by Chinese but not by people jealous of the C919
View attachment 208391