Angel of War
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Messages
- 2,078
- Likes
- 7,306
such simulations are done in war gamesHow did they simulate a salvo of 6 Brahmos missiles? I can't imagine they actually fired 6 inert missiles at a US carrier group.
such simulations are done in war gamesHow did they simulate a salvo of 6 Brahmos missiles? I can't imagine they actually fired 6 inert missiles at a US carrier group.
Newer variants of the BrahMos like the BrahMos ER can go upto Mach 4.I think the Yakhont/Brahmos family is a great set of missiles.
China's Yakont/Brahmos -- the CX-1 -- was sold to Algeria and possibly Morocco too.
Algeria Acquires Lethal Mach 3 Ship Hunting Missies from China; How the CX-1 Allows Algiers to Close Off the Mediterranean
By far the largest defence spender in Africa, Algeria has been a leading client for Russia and increasingly for Chinese arms in an attempt to modernise its armed forces.militarywatchmagazine.com
View attachment 136578
The CX-1 is 6600lbs and 28 feet long -- about the same size and weight as Yakhont and Brahmos.
But the PLAN uses mainly the YJ-12 which is around 4500lbs and 21 feet long.
Both are up to MACH 4 with latest variants.
The PLAN's Sovremennys are being upgraded to YJ-12 from Sunburn.
CX-1
View attachment 136578
YJ-12
View attachment 136582
Sovremenny of PLA Navy with YJ-12 canisters!
View attachment 136583
https://www.defensenews.com/global/...eal-for-brahmos-supersonic-anti-ship-missile/The BrahMos is guided by an active radar homing system or by satellite, and it has an inertial navigation system for midcourse guidance. The missile’s punch comes in the form of a 200-kilogram (440-pound) warhead.
It is propelled by a solid-fuel first booster stage and a liquid-fuel ramjet second stage, propelling the missile to speeds around Mach 4, or four times the speed of sound.
The export variant has a range of 290 kilometers (180 miles). That range is downrated to comply with international agreements, but would still be sufficient for the Philippines to provide cover for some of its holdings in the disputed South China Sea.
That is better than what they named the JH-7 Flying Leopard: NATO code name is Flounder.I just learned the type 52D destroyer is actually called the Kunming class. Luyang III is just the NATO designation. If NATO is going to use a Chinese word to denote the vessel class why not us China's designation? So strange.
Wonder what the Chinese actually call their various ship classes. Wonder even more why NATO renames them. Kind of like meeting somebody, they say, "Hi my name is Jim." NATO replies, "Hello, I will call you Bert." WTF?
P800 Oniks and Yakhont are the Same Missiles. In the Export Market, the P800 is designated as Yakhont. the Yakhont is limited by international treaties to have a range limit of 300km, but Onyx has no such limits and is probably longer ranged and with a heavier warhead.brahmos derives its base design from P800 but its capabilities , maneuverability and ECCM capabilities are more advanced than p800
NATO reporting names are actually code names for military equipment from countries like Russia, China, and historically, the Eastern Bloc. NATO does give some really good names for Weopons like :That is better than what they named the JH-7 Flying Leopard: NATO code name is Flounder.
View attachment 137300
bruh i never said that P800 and yakhont are differentP800 Oniks and Yakhont are the Same Missiles. In the Export Market, the P800 is designated as Yakhont. the Yakhont is limited by international treaties to have a range limit of 300km, but Onyx has no such limits and is probably longer ranged and with a heavier warhead.
Really? Sorry I thought you said that P800 and Yakhont are Different.bruh i never said that P800 and yakhont are different
Leopards don't fly last I checked. So how is that any better? May as well use flounder. Just be happy they didn't reuse the name for the Mig-15.That is better than what they named the JH-7 Flying Leopard: NATO code name is Flounder.
View attachment 137300
A complete list of destroyers in PLAN (as of 25 Feb 2022)A list of all destroyers in PLAN (as of 26 April 2021)
Total: 58
Commissioned destroyers: 39
Commissioning rate: 67.2%
1.DDG 113 Qingdao Type 052 (in service)
2.DDG 112 Harbin Type 052 (in service)
3.DDG 136 Hangzhou 956E (in service)
4.DDG 137 Fuzhou 956E (in service)
5.DDG 138 Taizhou 956EM (in service)
6.DDG 139 Ningbo 956EM (in service)
7.DDG 167 Shenzhen Type 051B (in service)
8.DDG 168 Guangzhou Type 052B (in service)
9.DDG 169 Wuhan Type 052B (in service)
10.DDG 115 Shenyang Type 051C (in service)
11.DDG 116 Shijiazhuang Type 051C (in service)
12.DDG 170 Lanzhou Type 052C (in service)
13.DDG 171 Haikou Type 052C (in service)
14.DDG 150 Changchun Type 052C (in service)
15.DDG 151 Zhengzhou Type 052C (in service)
16.DDG 152 Jinan Type 052C (in service)
17.DDG 153 Xi'an Type 052C (in service)
18.DDG 172 Kunming Type 052D (in service)
19.DDG 173 Changsha Type 052D (in service)
20.DDG 174 Hefei Type 052D (in service)
21.DDG 175 Yinchuan Type 052D (in service)
22.DDG 117 Xining Type 052D (in service)
23.DDG 154 Xiamen Type 052D (in service)
24.DDG 118 Urumqi Type 052D (in service)
25.DDG 119 Guiyang Type 052D (in service)
26.DDG 155 Nanjing Type 052D (in service)
27.DDG 131 Taiyuan Type 052D (in service)
28.DDG 161 Huhot Type 052D (in service)
29.DDG 120 Chengdu Type 052D (in service)
30.DDG 121 Qiqihar Type 052D (in service)
31.DDG 156 Zibo Type 052D (in service)
32.DDG 122 Tangshan Type 052D (in service)
33.DDG 132 Suzhou Type 052D (in service)
34.DDG 123 Huainan Type 052D (in service)
35.DDG 162 Nanning Type 052D (in service)
36.DDG 124 Kaifeng Type 052D (in service)
37.DDG 133 Baotou Type 052D (sea trial)
38.DDG 163 Jiaozuo Type 052D (sea trial)
39.DDG 164 Guilin Type 052D (sea trial)
40.DDG 134 Shaoxing Type 052D (sea trial)
41.DDG 165 Zhanjiang Type 052D (sea trial)
42.DDG 157 Zhuhai Type 052D (fitting out)
43.DDG 101 Nanchang Type 055 (in service)
44.DDG 102 Lhasa Type 055 (in service)
45.DDG 105 Dalian Type 055 (in service)
46.DDG 106 Yan'an Type 055 (sea trial)
47.DDG 103 Anshan Type 055 (sea trial)
48.DDG 104 Wuxi Type 055 (sea trial)
49.DDG 107 Zunyi Type 055 (fitting out)
50.DDG 108 ? Type 055 (fitting out)
51.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
52.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
53.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
54.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
55.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
56.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
57.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
58.DDG ? ? Type 055 (planned)
These older ships including the Russian Sovremennys were or are being refitted with new systems such as VLS!A complete list of destroyers in PLAN (as of 25 Feb 2022)
Total: 68
Commissioned destroyers: 44
Commissioning rate: 64.7%
3.DDG 136 Hangzhou 956E (in service)
4.DDG 137 Fuzhou 956E (in service)
5.DDG 138 Taizhou 956EM (in service)
6.DDG 139 Ningbo 956EM (in service)
7.DDG 167 Shenzhen Type 051B (in service)
8.DDG 168 Guangzhou Type 052B (in service)
9.DDG 169 Wuhan Type 052B (in service)
10.DDG 115 Shenyang Type 051C (in service)
11.DDG 116 Shijiazhuang Type 051C (in service)
how many destroyers and frigates are you guys building !Ignore the Type 055 in front. Up to six destroyers (055 or 052DL) are being assembled in the giant drydock to its left!
View attachment 155431
‘Third rate Chinese Navy destroyers hastily built on copied and reverse engineered technology are no match to Indian ships. Numbers do not matter only quality matters.how many destroyers and frigates are you guys building !
nope , don't give false statements sir. Please do some technical research before making such comments .‘Third rate Chinese Navy destroyers hastily built on copied and reverse engineered technology are no match to Indian ships. Numbers do not matter only quality matters.
It's not very good to underestimate Chinese Destroyers like that, the best Destroyer class present in Chinese inventory is the Type 55 class. The best and most advanced Destroyer class in India is the Visakhapatnam class.‘Third rate Chinese Navy destroyers hastily built on copied and reverse engineered technology are no match to Indian ships. Numbers do not matter only quality matters.
The way they are building and along with that they are refitted older destroyers with new advanced weapons and sensors is completely mind-bogglingnope , don't give false statements sir. Please do some technical research before making such comments .
Yep , you're right there . Type 055 outclasses anything we have . Our DDGs have 48 cell VLS . A single type 055 has 128 Cell VLSIt's not very good to underestimate Chinese Destroyers like that, the best Destroyer class present in Chinese inventory is the Type 55 class
The best and most advanced Destroyer class in India is the Visakhapatnam class.
Type 55 has a Displacement of 12-13,000 tonnes (full load). On the other hand our Visakhapatnam class has a Displacement of 7,400 t (7,300 long tons; 8,200 short tons). Also the Type-55 has superior armament to the Visakhapatnam class.
And please remember these words : "quantity has its own quality". It's a fact that Chinese Destroyers are way Superior to our Destroyers.