With more and more ships and more and more missiles, nobody would want to fight China
They haven't for the past 40 years.
What exactly made chinese fanboys overestimate P270 ?
This is what everyone understands until and unless that person doesn't fight wars are not based on who is biggerWith more and more ships and more and more missiles, nobody would want to fight China
Again, if Brahmos is based on Yakhont, it is nothing special to Chinese designers of AA systems.
brahmos derives its base design from P800 but its capabilities , maneuverability and ECCM capabilities are more advanced than p800With more and more ships and more and more missiles, nobody would want to fight China
Again, if Brahmos is based on Yakhont, it is nothing special to Chinese designers of AA systems.
During 1996, there was Taiwan Strait crisis. Two USAN CBGs came to Taiwan strat, almost disable all the PLAAF's costal anti warship and airpower capabilities.
[
Aren't they building all of this to make a war ' more likely' when seen in the context of Taiwan , SCS and senkaku dispute .The idea is to create such an overwhelming force that no one wants to fight China
Again, China hasn't fought a war in 40 years and likes to make money not war. This new navy China is building is just part of a defense expenditure that is only 1.5% of national GDP.
Many more Type 055s, Type 052DLs, Type 075s, Type 095s, etc. are coming. They will make war very unlikely.
That's your thinking but warfare has many options not necessarily for element to contributeThe idea is to create such an overwhelming force that no one wants to fight China
Again, China hasn't fought a war in 40 years and likes to make money not war. This new navy China is building is just part of a defense expenditure that is only 1.5% of national GDP.
Many more Type 055s, Type 052DLs, Type 075s, Type 095s, etc. are coming. They will make war very unlikely.
CX-1 was the same story with Chinese input instead of Indian on a Russian base. I understand, you are confident that the Indian input on Yakhont would somehow be better than the Chinese input.
PH seems to disagree
Last point is just awesome plan had other missiles so didn't equip its best missile cx-1CX-1 was the same story with Chinese input instead of Indian on a Russian base. I understand, you are confident that the Indian input on Yakhont would somehow be better than the Chinese input.
But China has a much longer record on missiles and a much bigger electronics industry.
If you look at space launches (basically missiles!), China had 53 successes (3 failures) in 2021 to India's 1 success (and 1 failure.)
Anyone betting would put money on China's input on the Yakhont over India's to be perfectly honest. But China didn't put the Yakhont or CX-1 as its main frontline weapon unlike India because there were better missiles
To be frank, most Chinese fan don't have interest on how killing Brahmos it is. I bought my first military magzine on 1991, when the gulf war began. It said LCA and Arjun were most advanced weapon from developing nations and will enter the service soon, the specifcaitons from them were surprised, and during that time China had nothing to compare.
It is making war less likely with Chinese ships and aircraft making Chinese patrols common place and routine because now one wants to stop them and risk war.
Let's face it, both China and India had bought many of the same hardware from Russia. Some have direct equivalents in both India and China. The J-16 is a frontline SU-30 derivative just like the SU-30 MKI.
How did they simulate a salvo of 6 Brahmos missiles? I can't imagine they actually fired 6 inert missiles at a US carrier group.
It's a simulation sirji , I have also heard that a kilo class submarine sank a us navy ship too
After losing 39 soldiers PLA soldiers in Galwan Valley ..Poor CCP has to introduce Qi Fabao ( who was brutally kicked by Indian army) as torch bearer...the whole world knows how Indian army kicked the PLA in galwan....Now show some strength tell us the truth about the no of dead PLA soldiers were 39 or 69 !!!!
That I can understand. If a submarine surfaces or actively starts pinging its sonar well within torpedo or anti-ship missile range of its target, it has proven it can evade the anti-sub warfare efforts of its adversary in an exercise.
